| Literature DB >> 26526252 |
Steven L Gortmaker1, Y Claire Wang2, Michael W Long3, Catherine M Giles4, Zachary J Ward5, Jessica L Barrett6, Erica L Kenney7, Kendrin R Sonneville8, Amna Sadaf Afzal9, Stephen C Resch10, Angie L Cradock11.
Abstract
Policy makers seeking to reduce childhood obesity must prioritize investment in treatment and primary prevention. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of seven interventions high on the obesity policy agenda: a sugar-sweetened beverage excise tax; elimination of the tax subsidy for advertising unhealthy food to children; restaurant menu calorie labeling; nutrition standards for school meals; nutrition standards for all other food and beverages sold in schools; improved early care and education; and increased access to adolescent bariatric surgery. We used systematic reviews and a microsimulation model of national implementation of the interventions over the period 2015-25 to estimate their impact on obesity prevalence and their cost-effectiveness for reducing the body mass index of individuals. In our model, three of the seven interventions--excise tax, elimination of the tax deduction, and nutrition standards for food and beverages sold in schools outside of meals--saved more in health care costs than they cost to implement. Each of the three interventions prevented 129,000-576,000 cases of childhood obesity in 2025. Adolescent bariatric surgery had a negligible impact on obesity prevalence. Our results highlight the importance of primary prevention for policy makers aiming to reduce childhood obesity. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.Entities:
Keywords: Children’s Health; Health Promotion/Disease Prevention
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26526252 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) ISSN: 0278-2715 Impact factor: 6.301