Ruthanne Marcus1, Iuliia Makarenko2, Alyona Mazhnaya2, Alexei Zelenev3, Maxim Polonsky3, Lynn Madden4, Sergii Filippovych2, Sergii Dvoriak5, Sandra A Springer3, Frederick L Altice6. 1. Yale School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: Ruthanne.marcus@yale.edu. 2. ICF Alliance for Public Health, Kyiv, Ukraine. 3. Yale School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, New Haven, CT, USA. 4. APT Foundation, New Haven, CT, USA. 5. Ukrainian Institute on Public Health Policy, Kyiv, Ukraine. 6. Yale School of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, New Haven CT, USA; Centre of Excellence on Research in AIDS (CERiA), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scaling up HIV prevention for people who inject drugs (PWID) using opioid agonist therapies (OAT) in Ukraine has been restricted by individual and structural factors. Extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX), however, provides new opportunities for treating opioid use disorders (OUDs) in this region, where both HIV incidence and mortality continue to increase. METHODS: Survey results from 1613 randomly selected PWID from 5 regions in Ukraine who were currently, previously or never on OAT were analyzed for their preference of pharmacological therapies for treating OUDs. For those preferring XR-NTX, independent correlates of their willingness to initiate XR-NTX were examined. RESULTS: Among the 1613 PWID, 449 (27.8%) were interested in initiating XR-NTX. Independent correlates associated with interest in XR-NTX included: being from Mykolaiv (AOR=3.7, 95% CI=2.3-6.1) or Dnipro (AOR=1.8, 95% CI=1.1-2.9); never having been on OAT (AOR=3.4, 95% CI=2.1-5.4); shorter-term injectors (AOR=0.9, 95% CI 0.9-0.98); and inversely for both positive (AOR=0.8, CI=0.8-0.9), and negative attitudes toward OAT (AOR=1.3, CI=1.2-1.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of Eastern Europe and Central Asia where HIV is concentrated in PWID and where HIV prevention with OAT is under-scaled, new options for treating OUDs are urgently needed. FINDINGS: here suggest that XR-NTX could become an option for addiction treatment and HIV prevention especially for PWID who have shorter duration of injection and who harbor negative attitudes to OAT. Decision aids that inform patient preferences with accurate information about the various treatment options are likely to guide patients toward better, patient-centered treatments and improve treatment entry and retention.
BACKGROUND: Scaling up HIV prevention for people who inject drugs (PWID) using opioid agonist therapies (OAT) in Ukraine has been restricted by individual and structural factors. Extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX), however, provides new opportunities for treating opioid use disorders (OUDs) in this region, where both HIV incidence and mortality continue to increase. METHODS: Survey results from 1613 randomly selected PWID from 5 regions in Ukraine who were currently, previously or never on OAT were analyzed for their preference of pharmacological therapies for treating OUDs. For those preferring XR-NTX, independent correlates of their willingness to initiate XR-NTX were examined. RESULTS: Among the 1613 PWID, 449 (27.8%) were interested in initiating XR-NTX. Independent correlates associated with interest in XR-NTX included: being from Mykolaiv (AOR=3.7, 95% CI=2.3-6.1) or Dnipro (AOR=1.8, 95% CI=1.1-2.9); never having been on OAT (AOR=3.4, 95% CI=2.1-5.4); shorter-term injectors (AOR=0.9, 95% CI 0.9-0.98); and inversely for both positive (AOR=0.8, CI=0.8-0.9), and negative attitudes toward OAT (AOR=1.3, CI=1.2-1.4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of Eastern Europe and Central Asia where HIV is concentrated in PWID and where HIV prevention with OAT is under-scaled, new options for treating OUDs are urgently needed. FINDINGS: here suggest that XR-NTX could become an option for addiction treatment and HIV prevention especially for PWID who have shorter duration of injection and who harbor negative attitudes to OAT. Decision aids that inform patient preferences with accurate information about the various treatment options are likely to guide patients toward better, patient-centered treatments and improve treatment entry and retention.
Authors: Babak Tofighi; Arthur Robin Williams; Chemi Chemi; Selena Suhail-Sindhu; Vicky Dickson; Joshua D Lee Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Evgeny Krupitsky; Elena Blokhina; Edwin Zvartau; Elena Verbitskaya; Dmitri Lioznov; Tatiana Yaroslavtseva; Vladimir Palatkin; Marina Vetrova; Natalia Bushara; Andrei Burakov; Dmitri Masalov; Olga Mamontova; Daniel Langleben; Sabrina Poole; Robert Gross; George Woody Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Matisyahu Shulman; Mei-Chen Hu; Maria A Sullivan; Sarah C Akerman; James Fratantonio; Vincent Barbieri; Edward V Nunes; Adam Bisaga Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 4.492