Literature DB >> 27458307

Phase III Randomized Trial of Ipilimumab Plus Etoposide and Platinum Versus Placebo Plus Etoposide and Platinum in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Martin Reck1, Alexander Luft1, Aleksandra Szczesna1, Libor Havel1, Sang-We Kim1, Wallace Akerley1, Maria Catherine Pietanza1, Yi-Long Wu1, Christoph Zielinski1, Michael Thomas1, Enriqueta Felip1, Kathryn Gold1, Leora Horn1, Joachim Aerts1, Kazuhiko Nakagawa1, Paul Lorigan1, Anne Pieters1, Teresa Kong Sanchez1, Justin Fairchild1, David Spigel1.   

Abstract

Purpose Patients with extensive-stage disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have poor survival outcomes despite first-line chemotherapy with etoposide and platinum. This randomized, double-blind phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab or placebo plus etoposide and platinum in patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage disease SCLC. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned at a ratio of one to one to receive chemotherapy with etoposide and platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) plus ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for a total of four doses each in a phased induction schedule (chemotherapy in cycles one to four; ipilimumab or placebo beginning in cycle three up to cycle six), followed by ipilimumab or placebo maintenance every 12 weeks. Primary end point was overall survival (OS) among patients receiving at least one dose of blinded study therapy. Results Of 1,132 patients randomly assigned, 954 received at least one dose of study therapy (chemotherapy plus ipilimumab, n = 478; chemotherapy plus placebo, n = 476). Median OS was 11.0 months for chemotherapy plus ipilimumab versus 10.9 months for chemotherapy plus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.09; P = .3775). Median progression-free survival was 4.6 months for chemotherapy plus ipilimumab versus 4.4 months for chemotherapy plus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.97). Rates and severity of treatment-related adverse events were similar between arms, except for diarrhea, rash, and colitis, which were more frequent with chemotherapy plus ipilimumab. Rate of treatment-related discontinuation was higher with chemotherapy plus ipilimumab (18% v 2% with chemotherapy plus placebo). Five treatment-related deaths occurred with chemotherapy plus ipilimumab and two with chemotherapy plus placebo. Conclusion Addition of ipilimumab to chemotherapy did not prolong OS versus chemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage disease SCLC. No new or unexpected adverse events were observed with chemotherapy plus ipilimumab. Several ongoing studies are evaluating ipilimumab in combination with programmed death-1 inhibitors in SCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27458307     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.6601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  160 in total

Review 1.  Current Treatments for Surgically Resectable, Limited-Stage, and Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Stinchcombe
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-08-04

Review 2.  A Review of Monoclonal Antibody-Based Treatments in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yunes Panahi; Amir Hossein Mohammadzadeh; Behzad Behnam; Hossein M Orafai; Tannaz Jamialahmadi; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  New advances in immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Haifeng Qin; Fang Wang; Hui Liu; Zhen Zeng; Shasha Wang; Xin Pan; Hongjun Gao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Assessment of neuronal autoantibodies in patients with small cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy with or without ipilimumab.

Authors:  M Hardy-Werbin; O Arpí; A Taus; P Rocha; D Joseph-Pietras; L Nolan; S Danson; R Griffiths; M Lopez-Botet; A Rovira; J Albanell; C H Ottensmeier; E Arriola
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 8.110

5.  Harnessing the potential synergy of combining radiation therapy and immunotherapy for thoracic malignancies.

Authors:  Charles B Simone; Abigail T Berman; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04

Review 6.  Current landscape of immunotherapy in the treatment of solid tumours, with future opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  N A Nixon; N Blais; S Ernst; C Kollmannsberger; G Bebb; M Butler; M Smylie; S Verma
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors and small cell lung cancer: what's new?

Authors:  Sabine Schmid; Martin Früh
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Where are we with treatment options after first line in small cell lung cancer?-report of two opposite cases treated with CAPTEM regimen and possible perspectives.

Authors:  Alessio Cortellini; Antonella Dal Mas; Katia Cannita; Guido Collina; Alessandro Parisi; Francesco Pavese; Giampiero Porzio; Lucilla Verna; Corrado Ficorella
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Lung Cancers: Molecular Characterization, Clonal Heterogeneity and Evolution, and Cancer Stem Cells.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Prolonging Survival: The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Melosky; Parneet K Cheema; Anthony Brade; Deanna McLeod; Geoffrey Liu; Paul Wheatley Price; Kevin Jao; Devin D Schellenberg; Rosalyn Juergens; Natasha Leighl; Quincy Chu
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.