Literature DB >> 27457112

Hospital delivery volume, severe obstetrical morbidity, and failure to rescue.

Alexander M Friedman1, Cande V Ananth2, Yongmei Huang3, Mary E D'Alton3, Jason D Wright3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the setting of persistently high risk for maternal death and severe obstetric morbidity, little is known about the relationship between hospital delivery volume and maternal outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this analysis were (1) to determine maternal risk for severe morbidity during delivery hospitalizations by hospital delivery volume in the United States and (2) to characterize, by hospital volume, the risk for death in the setting of severe obstetric morbidity, a concept known as failure to rescue. STUDY
DESIGN: This cohort study evaluated 50,433,539 delivery hospitalizations across the United States from 1998-2010. The main outcome measures were (1) severe morbidity that was defined as a composite of any 1 of 15 diagnoses that are representative of acute organ injury and critical illness and (2) failure to rescue that was defined as death in the setting of severe morbidity.
RESULTS: The prevalence of severe morbidity rose from 471.2-751.5 cases per 100,000 deliveries from 1998-2010, which was an increase of 59.5%. Failure to rescue was highest in 1998 (1.5%), decreased to 0.6% in 2007, and rose to 0.9% in 2010. In models that were adjusted for comorbid risk and hospital factors, both low and high annualized delivery volume were associated with increased risk for failure to rescue and severe morbidity. However, the relative importance of hospital volume for both outcomes compared with other factors was relatively small.
CONCLUSION: Although low-and high-delivery volume are associated with increased risk for both failure to rescue and severe maternal morbidity, other factors, in particular characteristics of individual centers, may be more important in the determination of outcomes. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  failure to rescue; hospital delivery volume; severe obstetrical morbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27457112      PMCID: PMC5124527          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  44 in total

1.  Procedure volume as a predictor of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Jing Cao
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Flexible regression models with cubic splines.

Authors:  S Durrleman; R Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit: a 12-year review.

Authors:  Suleiman A Al-Suleiman; Hatem O Qutub; Jessica Rahman; M Sayedur Rahman
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 1998 to 2005.

Authors:  Cynthia J Berg; William M Callaghan; Carla Syverson; Zsakeba Henderson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Hospital procedure volume and teaching status do not influence treatment and outcome measures of rectal cancer surgery in a large general population.

Authors:  M Simunovic; T To; N Baxter; A Balshem; E Ross; Z Cohen; R McLeod; P Engstrom; E Sigurdson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Risk factors for obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit in a tertiary hospital: a case-control study.

Authors:  Daniel O Selo-Ojeme; Monica Omosaiye; Parijat Battacharjee; Rezan A Kadir
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Saving Mothers' Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Roch Cantwell; Thomas Clutton-Brock; Griselda Cooper; Andrew Dawson; James Drife; Debbie Garrod; Ann Harper; Diana Hulbert; Sebastian Lucas; John McClure; Harry Millward-Sadler; James Neilson; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Jane Norman; Colm O'Herlihy; Margaret Oates; Judy Shakespeare; Michael de Swiet; Catherine Williamson; Valerie Beale; Marian Knight; Christopher Lennox; Alison Miller; Dharmishta Parmar; Jane Rogers; Anna Springett
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Validation of an obstetric comorbidity index in an external population.

Authors:  A Metcalfe; L M Lix; J-A Johnson; G Currie; A W Lyon; F Bernier; S C Tough
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Risk factors and newborn outcomes associated with maternal deaths in the UK from 2009 to 2013: a national case-control study.

Authors:  M Nair; M Knight; J J Kurinczuk
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Improving hospital quality to reduce disparities in severe maternal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Howell; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Classification of Medicaid Coverage on Birth Records in Wisconsin, 2011-2012.

Authors:  David C Mallinson; Deborah B Ehrenthal
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  National trends in tranexamic acid use in the peripartum period, 2015-2019.

Authors:  Homa K Ahmadzia; Elaine B Hynds; Richard L Amdur; Alexis C Gimovsky; Andra H James; Naomi L C Luban
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Trends in comorbidity, acuity, and maternal risk associated with preeclampsia across obstetric volume settings.

Authors:  Whitney A Booker; Cande V Ananth; Jason D Wright; Zainab Siddiq; Mary E D'Alton; Kirstin L Cleary; Dena Goffman; Alexander M Friedman
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2018-03-12

5.  Social Determinants of Pregnancy-Related Mortality and Morbidity in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eileen Wang; Kimberly B Glazer; Elizabeth A Howell; Teresa M Janevic
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.623

6.  Severe Maternal Morbidity: A Comparison of Definitions and Data Sources.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Audrey Lyndon; Peiyi Kan; Alison El Ayadi; Elliott Main; Suzan L Carmichael
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.363

7.  Black-White disparities in maternal in-hospital mortality according to teaching and Black-serving hospital status.

Authors:  Heather H Burris; Molly Passarella; Sara C Handley; Sindhu K Srinivas; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 10.693

8.  Effect of China's maternal health policy on improving rural hospital delivery: Evidence from two cross-sectional surveys.

Authors:  Xiaojing Fan; Yongjian Xu; Martyn Stewart; Zhongliang Zhou; Shaonong Dang; Duolao Wang; Jianmin Gao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Perspective On Excellence in Forensic Mental Health Services: What We Can Learn From Oncology and Other Medical Services.

Authors:  Harry G Kennedy; Alexander Simpson; Quazi Haque
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.435

10.  Birth hospital and racial and ethnic differences in severe maternal morbidity in the state of California.

Authors:  Mahasin S Mujahid; Peiyi Kan; Stephanie A Leonard; Elleni M Hailu; Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Barbara Abrams; Elliott Main; Jochen Profit; Suzan L Carmichael
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.