Literature DB >> 27457097

Comparing the effects of positive and negative feedback in information-integration category learning.

Michael Freedberg1, Brian Glass2, J Vincent Filoteo3, Eliot Hazeltine4, W Todd Maddox5.   

Abstract

Categorical learning is dependent on feedback. Here, we compare how positive and negative feedback affect information-integration (II) category learning. Ashby and O'Brien (2007) demonstrated that both positive and negative feedback are required to solve II category problems when feedback was not guaranteed on each trial, and reported no differences between positive-only and negative-only feedback in terms of their effectiveness. We followed up on these findings and conducted 3 experiments in which participants completed 2,400 II categorization trials across three days under 1 of 3 conditions: positive feedback only (PFB), negative feedback only (NFB), or both types of feedback (CP; control partial). An adaptive algorithm controlled the amount of feedback given to each group so that feedback was nearly equated. Using different feedback control procedures, Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that participants in the NFB and CP group were able to engage II learning strategies, whereas the PFB group was not. Additionally, the NFB group was able to achieve significantly higher accuracy than the PFB group by Day 3. Experiment 3 revealed that these differences remained even when we equated the information received on feedback trials. Thus, negative feedback appears significantly more effective for learning II category structures. This suggests that the human implicit learning system may be capable of learning in the absence of positive feedback.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Categorization; Implicit learning; Negative feedback; Positive feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27457097      PMCID: PMC5239721          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0638-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  26 in total

1.  The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems.

Authors:  E M Waldron; F G Ashby
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby; Corey J Bohil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Incidental learning of rewarded associations bolsters learning on an associative task.

Authors:  Michael Freedberg; Jonathan Schacherer; Eliot Hazeltine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Reward feedback accelerates motor learning.

Authors:  Ali A Nikooyan; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Losses as modulators of attention: review and analysis of the unique effects of losses over gains.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Guy Hochman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Reward and punishment act as distinct factors in guiding behavior.

Authors:  Jan Kubanek; Lawrence H Snyder; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-03-28

8.  Reward improves long-term retention of a motor memory through induction of offline memory gains.

Authors:  Mitsunari Abe; Heidi Schambra; Eric M Wassermann; Dave Luckenbaugh; Nicolas Schweighofer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Identifying strategy use in category learning tasks: a case for more diagnostic data and models.

Authors:  Chris Donkin; Ben R Newell; Mike Kalish; John C Dunn; Robert M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Elizabeth Mallia; John Rothwell; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  3 in total

1.  Linear separability, irrelevant variability, and categorization difficulty.

Authors:  Luke A Rosedahl; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.140

2.  The impact of reward and punishment on skill learning depends on task demands.

Authors:  Adam Steel; Edward H Silson; Charlotte J Stagg; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Systematic Review of Self-Assessment in Physical Education.

Authors:  Fernando M Otero-Saborido; Victor Torreblanca-Martínez; José Antonio González-Jurado
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.