Literature DB >> 27457079

[Revision surgery in episcleral glaucoma drainage devices].

A Rosentreter1, T S Dietlein2.   

Abstract

Episcleral glaucoma drainage devices (e.g., Ahmed or Baerveldt drainage device) are often used at a late stage in the care of glaucoma patients. At this stage other surgical techniques, such as trabeculectomy or viscocanaloplasty, have failed. However, the trend towards earlier implant surgery is supported by large randomized trials. Physicians should be aware of typical complications and, if possible, these should already be avoided by careful surgical technique. In this review article, we focus on postoperative hypotension, postoperative pressure increases, implant exposure, and possible corneal decompensation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ahmed drainage device; Baerveldt drainage device; Complications; Hypotension; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27457079     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-016-0334-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  17 in total

1.  A novel use of amniotic membrane in the management of tube exposure following glaucoma tube shunt surgery.

Authors:  G Ainsworth; A Rotchford; H S Dua; A J King
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Biodegradable implant for tissue repair after glaucoma drainage device surgery.

Authors:  André Rosentreter; Andrea M Schild; Sven Dinslage; Thomas S Dietlein
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Failed glaucoma drainage implant: long-term outcomes of a second glaucoma drainage device versus cyclophotocoagulation.

Authors:  Jamie Lea Schaefer; Monica A Levine; Gina Martorana; Helen Koenigsman; M Fran Smith; Mark B Sherwood
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Aqueous shunt exposure: a retrospective review of repair outcome.

Authors:  Stephen M Huddleston; Robert M Feldman; Donald L Budenz; Nicholas P Bell; David A Lee; Alice Z Chuang; Kimberly A Mankiewicz; Michael S Koval; Elizabeth Truong; Alexei Moraczewski
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The Ahmed versus Baerveldt study: three-year treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Panos G Christakis; James C Tsai; Jeffrey W Kalenak; David Zurakowski; Louis B Cantor; Jeffrey A Kammer; Iqbal I K Ahmed
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  A Comparison of Sequential Glaucoma Drainage Device Implantation Versus Cyclophotocoagulation Following Failure of a Primary Drainage Device.

Authors:  Joshua D Levinson; Annette L Giangiacomo; Allen D Beck; Paul B Pruett; Hillary M Superak; Michael J Lynn; Anastasios P Costarides
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Late-onset bacteria endophthalmitis following glaucoma drainage implantation.

Authors:  Brian A Francis; David A DiLoreto; Lawrence P Chong; Narsing Rao
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

8.  Previous cyclodestruction is a risk factor for late-onset hypotony and suprachoroidal haemorrhage after glaucoma drainage device surgery.

Authors:  André Rosentreter; Stergiani Gaki; Alexandra Lappas; Claus Cursiefen; Thomas S Dietlein
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Sequential glaucoma implants in refractory glaucoma.

Authors:  Aashish Anand; Celso Tello; Paul A Sidoti; Robert Ritch; Jeffrey M Liebmann
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma.

Authors:  R S Ayyala; D Zurakowski; J A Smith; R Monshizadeh; P A Netland; D W Richards; W E Layden
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.