| Literature DB >> 27457021 |
Pietro Emanuele Napoli1, Matteo Nioi2, Ernesto d'Aloja2, Maurizio Fossarello1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of post-mortem central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by using a real-time, portable optical coherence tomography (OCT) system on an animal model, and to prospectively evaluate the time-course of post-mortem changes in CCT. Forty-six ocular globes of sheep (Ovis aries) were analyzed with a portable spectral-domain OCT device by two operators at different postmortem intervals (PMIs) as follows: immediately (i.e. within 10 minutes), at the 30(th) minute, at the 1(st), 6(th), 12(th), 24(th) and 48(th) hour, and later (up to the 96(th) hour). The coefficient of repeatability ranged from 0.3% to 3.5%, and coefficients of reproducibility ranged from 0.2% to 3.7% in the central region of the cornea. The intraclass correlation coefficients were particularly high at different PMIs, thus confirming good measurement reliability with the portable OCT. The average CCT decreased immediately and then increased thereafter, with two peaks at 6 and 24 hours after death. Our results suggest that portable OCT is a reliable tool for monitoring CCT variations after death and may be useful in characterizing corneas before explantation, detecting quantitative variations during post-mortem corneal degeneration or assessing changes in CCT for forensic implications.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27457021 PMCID: PMC4960653 DOI: 10.1038/srep30428
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1OCT imaging (pachymetry map).
The iVue SD-OCT pachymetric map generated by each scan performed during various post-mortem intervals. Central corneal reflex and alignment beam were coaxial during OCT scanning (at the top of the image). Central pachymetry was obtained in the central region, 0–2 mm in diameter (at the bottom right of the image).
Average Corneal Thickness Measurements.
| PMIs (timepoints) | M1 | M2 | M3 | Δ (M1–M2) | Δ (M1–M3) | Δ (M2–M3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 512.31 ± 16.31 | 512.56 ± 16.68 | 513.50 ± 16.34 | 0.16 ± 9.15 | −0.82 ± 9.77 | −0.98 ± 5.98 | |
| 497.19 ± 12.9 | 419.81 ± 12.5 | 419.75 ± 11.53 | −0.62 ± 1.74 | −0.56 ± 3.48 | −0.06 ± 2.86 | |
| 486.38 ± 18.04 | 486.37 ± 18.6 | 488.25 ± 18.19 | 0.0 ± 6.58 | −1.87 ± 4.96 | −1.87 ± 3.73 | |
| 677.81 ± 50.83 | 675.19 ± 50.38 | 675.25 ± 49.85 | 2.62 ± 3.64 | 2.56 ± 3.79 | −0.06 ± 1.48 | |
| 658.81 ± 42.75 | 659.63 ± 41.19 | 659.19 ± 41.06 | −0.81 ± 3.97 | −0.37 ± 5.89 | 0.43 ± 3.4 | |
| 666.69 ± 40.13 | 664.75 ± 40.24 | 664.69 ± 39.14 | 1.93 ± 3.33 | 2.0 ± 3.82 | 0.06 ± 2.01 | |
| 659.69 ± 40.21 | 658.88 ± 36.73 | 660.75 ± 38.02 | 0.81 ± 6.4 | −1.06 ± 4.4 | −1.87 ± 3.0 | |
| 661.5 ± 29.3 | 663.87 ± 47.09 | 667.56 ± 49.33 | −2.37 ± 23.63 | −6.06 ± 25.13 | −3.68 ± 15.43 |
Data are expressed at the mean ± SD (in micrometers).
M1 represents measurements by observer 1.
M2 represents repeat measurements by observer 1 at the same session (time-point).
M3 represents repeat measurements by observer 2 at the same session (time-point).
Δ represents difference.
PMIs represent postmortem intervals since death.
*Within a range of 48–96 hours.
Intraclass Correlations and Coefficients of Repeatability and Reproducibility.
| PMIs (time-points) | ICC | ICC | ICC | CoR % (M1–M2) | CVW% | CoR % (M1–M3) | CVW% | CoR % (M2–M3) | CVW% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.991 (0.974–0.997) | 0.991 (0.975–0.997) | 0.997 (0.993–0.999) | 1.1 (0.8–1.3) | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | 1.1 (0.8–1.3) | 0.5 (0.4–0.7) | 0.6 (0.4–0.8) | 0.3 (0.2–0.4) | |
| 0.991 (0.973–0.997) | 0.96 (0.888–0.986) | 0.972 (0.921–0.99) | 0.3 (0.2–0.5) | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | 0.8 (0.6–1.1) | 0.4 (0.3–0.5) | 0.6 (0.3–0.9) | 0.3 (0.2–0.4) | |
| 0.935 (0.826–0.977) | 0.962 (0.896–0.987) | 0.979 (0.942–0.993) | 1.5 (1.0–2.1) | 0.8 (0.5–1.0) | 1.1 (0.6–1.6) | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) | 0.7 (0.2–1.0) | 0.4 (0.1–0.6) | |
| 0.997 (0.993–0.999) | 0.997 (0.992–0.999) | 1.0 (0.999–1.0) | 0.7 (0.4–1) | 0.4 (0.2–0.5) | 0.7 (0.4–1.0) | 0.4 (0.2–0.5) | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | 0.1 (0.0–0.2) | |
| 0.996 (0.987–0.998) | 0.990 (0.972–0.997) | 0.997 (0.99–0.999) | 0.6 (0.3–0.9) | 0.3 (0.1–0.4) | 0.8 (0.3–1.3) | 0.4 (0.1–0.6) | 0.4 (0.1–0.7) | 0.2 (0.1–0.4) | |
| 0.997 (0.99–0.999) | 0.995 (0.987–0.998) | 0.999 (0.996–1.0) | 0.5 (0.2–0.9) | 0.2 (0.1–0.4) | 0.6 (0.2–0.9) | 0.3 (0.1–0.4) | 0.3 (0.1–0.5) | 0.1 (0.1–0.2) | |
| 0.986 (0.961–0.995) | 0.994 (0.982–0.998) | 0.997 (0.991–0.999) | 0.8 (0.3–1.3) | 0.4 (0.1–0.6) | 0.8 (0.5–1.0) | 0.3 (0.2–0.5) | 0.5 (0.2–0.7) | 0.2 (0.1–0.4) | |
| 0.819 (0.556–0.933) | 0.808 (0.534–0.928) | 0.949 (0.860–0.982) | 3.5 (1.7–5.4) | 1.7 (0.8–2.7) | 3.7 (1.6–5.7) | 1.8 (0.8–2.8) | 2.2 (1–3.5) | 1.1 (0.5–1.7) |
aType C intraclass correlation coefficients using a consistency definition: the between- measure variance is excluded from the denominator variance. The estimator is the same, whether the interaction effect is present or not.
*Within a range of 48–96 hours.
Data in parentheses represent 95% CI.
M1 represents measurements by observer 1;
M2 represents repeat measurements by observer 1 at the same session (time-point);
M3 represents repeat measurements by observer 2 at the same session (time-point).
CoR (M1, M2) coefficient of repeatability;
CoR (M1, M3), CoR (M2, M3), coefficients of reproducibility;
CVw, coefficient of variation.
CoR and CVw are expressed as percentages (Coefficients % = Coefficients *100).
Figure 2Bland-Altman plot of repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements.
Mean central corneal thickness (CCT) for paired intraobserver measurements (obtained by operator 1) is plotted against the difference in CCT between the two results. Overall, 95% of the values fell within 2 SDs of the mean.
Figure 3Bland-Altman plot of reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained by observer 1 (first measurement) and observer 2.
Mean central corneal thickness (CCT) for paired interobserver measurements (obtained by operator 1 and operator 2) is plotted against difference in CCT between the two results. Ninety-five percent of the values fell within 2 SDs of the mean.
Figure 4Bland-Altman plot of reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained by observer 1 (second measurement) and observer 2.
Mean central corneal thickness (CCT) for paired interobserver measurements (obtained by operator 1 and operator 2) is plotted against difference in CCT between the two results. Ninety-six percent of the values fell within 2 SDs of the mean.
Figure 5OCT imaging of corneal morphology in later post-mortem intervals.
A horizontal, high-resolution Fourier-domain, cross-sectional OCT scan of the central cornea (2 mm of diameter). Irregular variations in corneal contour due to corneal edema, ocular hypotony or advanced decomposing processes were observed during OCT scans performed after 48 hours from death. These findings probably led to an increase in variability of pachymetric measurements obtained during later post-mortem intervals (within a range of 48–96 hours) compared with earlier results.
Figure 6Central corneal thickness (CCT) determined by optical coherence tomography versus post-mortem intervals.
Corneal thickness decreases immediately after death and increases thereafter, with two different peaks at 6 and 24 hours after death.