Alexandra Fouts1, Laura Pyle2, Liping Yu1, Dongmei Miao1, Aaron Michels1, Jeffrey Krischer3, Jay Sosenko4, Peter Gottlieb1, Andrea K Steck5. 1. Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO. 3. Pediatrics Epidemiology Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL. 4. University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL. 5. Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO andrea.steck@ucdenver.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assays can help improve prediction of time to type 1 diabetes in the TrialNet autoantibody-positive population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: TrialNet subjects who were positive for one or more autoantibodies (microinsulin autoantibody, GAD65 autoantibody [GADA], IA-2A, and ZnT8A) with available ECL-insulin autoantibody (IAA) and ECL-GADA data at their initial visit were analyzed; after a median follow-up of 24 months, 177 of these 1,287 subjects developed diabetes. RESULTS: Univariate analyses showed that autoantibodies by radioimmunoassays (RIAs), ECL-IAA, ECL-GADA, age, sex, number of positive autoantibodies, presence of HLA DR3/4-DQ8 genotype, HbA1c, and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) measurements were all significantly associated with progression to diabetes. Subjects who were ECL positive had a risk of progression to diabetes within 6 years of 58% compared with 5% for the ECL-negative subjects (P < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were compared, with the base model including age, sex, OGTT measurements, and number of positive autoantibodies by RIAs. The model with positivity for ECL-GADA and/or ECL-IAA was the best, and factors that remained significantly associated with time to diabetes were area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide, fasting C-peptide, AUC glucose, number of positive autoantibodies by RIAs, and ECL positivity. Adding ECL to the Diabetes Prevention Trial risk score (DPTRS) improved the receiver operating characteristic curves with AUC of 0.83 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ECL assays improved the ability to predict time to diabetes in these autoantibody-positive relatives at risk for developing diabetes. These findings might be helpful in the design and eligibility criteria for prevention trials in the future.
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assays can help improve prediction of time to type 1 diabetes in the TrialNet autoantibody-positive population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: TrialNet subjects who were positive for one or more autoantibodies (microinsulin autoantibody, GAD65 autoantibody [GADA], IA-2A, and ZnT8A) with available ECL-insulin autoantibody (IAA) and ECL-GADA data at their initial visit were analyzed; after a median follow-up of 24 months, 177 of these 1,287 subjects developed diabetes. RESULTS: Univariate analyses showed that autoantibodies by radioimmunoassays (RIAs), ECL-IAA, ECL-GADA, age, sex, number of positive autoantibodies, presence of HLA DR3/4-DQ8 genotype, HbA1c, and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) measurements were all significantly associated with progression to diabetes. Subjects who were ECL positive had a risk of progression to diabetes within 6 years of 58% compared with 5% for the ECL-negative subjects (P < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were compared, with the base model including age, sex, OGTT measurements, and number of positive autoantibodies by RIAs. The model with positivity for ECL-GADA and/or ECL-IAA was the best, and factors that remained significantly associated with time to diabetes were area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide, fasting C-peptide, AUC glucose, number of positive autoantibodies by RIAs, and ECL positivity. Adding ECL to the Diabetes Prevention Trial risk score (DPTRS) improved the receiver operating characteristic curves with AUC of 0.83 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ECL assays improved the ability to predict time to diabetes in these autoantibody-positive relatives at risk for developing diabetes. These findings might be helpful in the design and eligibility criteria for prevention trials in the future.
Authors: Jeffrey L Mahon; Jay M Sosenko; Lisa Rafkin-Mervis; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf; John M Lachin; Clinton Thompson; Polly J Bingley; Ezio Bonifacio; Jerry P Palmer; George S Eisenbarth; Joseph Wolfsdorf; Jay S Skyler Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: V Parikka; K Näntö-Salonen; M Saarinen; T Simell; J Ilonen; H Hyöty; R Veijola; M Knip; O Simell Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Ezio Bonifacio; Liping Yu; Alastair K Williams; George S Eisenbarth; Polly J Bingley; Santica M Marcovina; Kerstin Adler; Anette G Ziegler; Patricia W Mueller; Desmond A Schatz; Jeffrey P Krischer; Michael W Steffes; Beena Akolkar Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jay S Skyler; Carla J Greenbaum; John M Lachin; Ellen Leschek; Lisa Rafkin-Mervis; Peter Savage; Lisa Spain Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Janet M Wenzlau; Ong Moua; Suparna A Sarkar; Liping Yu; Marian Rewers; George S Eisenbarth; Howard W Davidson; John C Hutton Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Kendra Vehik; Craig A Beam; Jeffrey L Mahon; Desmond A Schatz; Michael J Haller; Jay M Sosenko; Jay S Skyler; Jeffrey P Krischer Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Tihamer Orban; Jay M Sosenko; David Cuthbertson; Jeffrey P Krischer; Jay S Skyler; Richard Jackson; Liping Yu; Jerry P Palmer; Desmond Schatz; George Eisenbarth Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Laura M Jacobsen; Laura Bocchino; Carmella Evans-Molina; Linda DiMeglio; Robin Goland; Darrell M Wilson; Mark A Atkinson; Tandy Aye; William E Russell; John M Wentworth; David Boulware; Susan Geyer; Jay M Sosenko Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Laura M Jacobsen; Brittney N Newby; Daniel J Perry; Amanda L Posgai; Michael J Haller; Todd M Brusko Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Taylor M Triolo; Laura Pyle; Hali Broncucia; Taylor Armstrong; Liping Yu; Peter A Gottlieb; Andrea K Steck Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Kenney Ng; Vibha Anand; Harry Stavropoulos; Riitta Veijola; Jorma Toppari; Marlena Maziarz; Markus Lundgren; Kathy Waugh; Brigitte I Frohnert; Frank Martin; Olivia Lou; William Hagopian; Peter Achenbach Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-10-05 Impact factor: 10.460
Authors: Mustafa Tosur; Susan M Geyer; Henry Rodriguez; Ingrid Libman; David A Baidal; Maria J Redondo Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Maria J Redondo; Jay Sosenko; Ingrid Libman; Jennifer J F McVean; Mustafa Tosur; Mark A Atkinson; Dorothy Becker; Susan Geyer Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Maria J Redondo; Brandon M Nathan; Laura M Jacobsen; Emily Sims; Laura E Bocchino; Alberto Pugliese; Desmond A Schatz; Mark A Atkinson; Jay Skyler; Jerry Palmer; Susan Geyer; Jay M Sosenko Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Ezio Bonifacio; Andreas Weiß; Christiane Winkler; Markus Hippich; Marian J Rewers; Jorma Toppari; Åke Lernmark; Jin-Xiong She; William A Hagopian; Jeffrey P Krischer; Kendra Vehik; Desmond A Schatz; Beena Akolkar; Anette-Gabriele Ziegler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-02-24 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Maria J Redondo; Megan V Warnock; Ingrid M Libman; Laura E Bocchino; David Cuthbertson; Susan Geyer; Alberto Pugliese; Andrea K Steck; Carmella Evans-Molina; Dorothy Becker; Jay M Sosenko; Fida Bacha Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 17.152