BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Autoantibodies to islet antigen-2 (IA-2A) and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) are markers for diagnosis, screening, and measuring outcomes in National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) consortia studies. A harmonization program was established to increase comparability of results within and among these studies. METHODS: Large volumes of six working calibrators were prepared from pooled sera with GADA 4.8-493 World Health Organization (WHO) units/ml and IA-2A 2-235 WHO units/ml. Harmonized assay protocols for IA-2A and GADA using (35)S-methionine-labelled in vitro transcribed and translated antigens were developed based on methods in use in three NIDDK laboratories. Antibody thresholds were defined using sera from patients with recent onset type 1 diabetes and healthy controls. To evaluate the impact of the harmonized assay protocol on concordance of IA-2A and GADA results, two laboratories retested stored TEDDY study sera using the harmonized assays. RESULTS: The harmonized assays gave comparable but not identical results in the three laboratories. For IA-2A, using a common threshold of 5 DK units/ml, 549 of 550 control and patient samples were concordantly scored as positive or negative, specificity was greater than 99% with sensitivity 64% in all laboratories. For GADA, using thresholds equivalent to the 97th percentile of 974 control samples in each laboratory, 1051 (97.9%) of 1074 samples were concordant. On the retested TEDDY samples, discordance decreased from 4 to 1.8% for IA-2A (n = 604 samples; P = 0.02) and from 15.4 to 2.7% for GADA (n = 515 samples; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Harmonization of GADA and IA-2A is feasible using large volume working calibrators and common protocols and is an effective approach to ensure consistency in autoantibody measurements.
BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Autoantibodies to islet antigen-2 (IA-2A) and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) are markers for diagnosis, screening, and measuring outcomes in National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) consortia studies. A harmonization program was established to increase comparability of results within and among these studies. METHODS: Large volumes of six working calibrators were prepared from pooled sera with GADA 4.8-493 World Health Organization (WHO) units/ml and IA-2A 2-235 WHO units/ml. Harmonized assay protocols for IA-2A and GADA using (35)S-methionine-labelled in vitro transcribed and translated antigens were developed based on methods in use in three NIDDK laboratories. Antibody thresholds were defined using sera from patients with recent onset type 1 diabetes and healthy controls. To evaluate the impact of the harmonized assay protocol on concordance of IA-2A and GADA results, two laboratories retested stored TEDDY study sera using the harmonized assays. RESULTS: The harmonized assays gave comparable but not identical results in the three laboratories. For IA-2A, using a common threshold of 5 DK units/ml, 549 of 550 control and patient samples were concordantly scored as positive or negative, specificity was greater than 99% with sensitivity 64% in all laboratories. For GADA, using thresholds equivalent to the 97th percentile of 974 control samples in each laboratory, 1051 (97.9%) of 1074 samples were concordant. On the retested TEDDY samples, discordance decreased from 4 to 1.8% for IA-2A (n = 604 samples; P = 0.02) and from 15.4 to 2.7% for GADA (n = 515 samples; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Harmonization of GADA and IA-2A is feasible using large volume working calibrators and common protocols and is an effective approach to ensure consistency in autoantibody measurements.
Authors: L Yu; M Rewers; R Gianani; E Kawasaki; Y Zhang; C Verge; P Chase; G Klingensmith; H Erlich; J Norris; G S Eisenbarth Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Dana Dabelea; Gregory Kinney; Janet K Snell-Bergeon; John E Hokanson; Robert H Eckel; James Ehrlich; Satish Garg; Richard F Hamman; Marian Rewers Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Janet M Wenzlau; Kirstine Juhl; Liping Yu; Ong Moua; Suparna A Sarkar; Peter Gottlieb; Marian Rewers; George S Eisenbarth; Jan Jensen; Howard W Davidson; John C Hutton Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jay S Skyler; Carla J Greenbaum; John M Lachin; Ellen Leschek; Lisa Rafkin-Mervis; Peter Savage; Lisa Spain Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Laura M Jacobsen; Laura Bocchino; Carmella Evans-Molina; Linda DiMeglio; Robin Goland; Darrell M Wilson; Mark A Atkinson; Tandy Aye; William E Russell; John M Wentworth; David Boulware; Susan Geyer; Jay M Sosenko Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Jean M Lawrence; Dana Dabelea; Jasmin Divers; Scott Isom; Lawrence Dolan; Giuseppina Imperatore; Barbara Linder; Santica Marcovina; David J Pettitt; Catherine Pihoker; Sharon Saydah; Lynne Wagenknecht Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeffrey P Krischer; Kristian F Lynch; Desmond A Schatz; Jorma Ilonen; Åke Lernmark; William A Hagopian; Marian J Rewers; Jin-Xiong She; Olli G Simell; Jorma Toppari; Anette-G Ziegler; Beena Akolkar; Ezio Bonifacio Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: H-S Lee; T Briese; C Winkler; M Rewers; E Bonifacio; H Hyoty; M Pflueger; O Simell; J X She; W Hagopian; Å Lernmark; B Akolkar; J Krischer; A G Ziegler Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Brigitte I Frohnert; Lisa Ide; Fran Dong; Anna E Barón; Andrea K Steck; Jill M Norris; Marian J Rewers Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Andrea K Steck; Fran Dong; Brigitte I Frohnert; Kathleen Waugh; Michelle Hoffman; Jill M Norris; Marian J Rewers Journal: J Autoimmun Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 7.094