Literature DB >> 32052389

Experiences of Health Care Providers Using a Mobile Medical Photography Application.

Kirk D Wyatt1, Brian N Willaert2, Christine M Lohse3, Peter J Pallagi4, James A Yiannias5,6, Thomas R Hellmich7,8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand the ways in which providers use a mobile photography application integrated with the electronic health record (EHR) to facilitate clinical care, and the process outcomes that result from the application's use.
METHODS: An e-mail survey was sent on November 13, 2017, to 1,463 health care providers at Mayo Clinic who had used an internally developed, EHR-integrated medical photography application.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 712 (49%) providers. Providers reported using the application on approximately 1 in 7 days spent in clinical practice. Median provider satisfaction with the use of the application (0-100 scale; higher numbers indicate favorable response) was 94 (interquartile range [IQR]: 74-100). Although the use for store-and-forward telemedicine was reported (22% often or frequently used the application to send photographs to a specialist for advice), the most common use was for clinical documentation (65% often or frequently used the application to supplement text-based notes with photographs, and 71% often or frequently used the application to take photographs for reference by a colleague who may see the patient in the future). Of the health care providers, 36% indicated that the application's use often or frequently expedited treatment. DISCUSSION: Health care providers reported using a mobile point-of-care medical photography application regularly in clinical practice and were generally satisfied with the application.
CONCLUSION: Point-of-care medical photography using a secure mobile, EHR-integrated application has potential to become a new standard of care for clinical documentation and may facilitate continuity across the continuum of care with multiple providers who see a patient. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32052389      PMCID: PMC7015814          DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  33 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

2.  Should 'smart phones' be used for patient photography?

Authors:  Natalie Chan; Jacob Charette; Danielle O Dumestre; Frankie Og Fraulin
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  Smartphones in Dermatology: Acceptance of Smartphone Photography by the Informed Patient.

Authors:  Julia L Accetta; Jason Schoenfeld; Carole Bitar; Andrea Murina
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  Parent Preferences for Methods and Content of Mobile Technology-Based Asthma Medication Adherence Intervention.

Authors:  Annie Lintzenich Andrews; Haley L Nitchie; Jillian B Harvey
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-08

5.  Estimating the association between burnout and electronic health record-related stress among advanced practice registered nurses.

Authors:  Daniel A Harris; Jacqueline Haskell; Emily Cooper; Nancy Crouse; Rebekah Gardner
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 2.257

6.  Digital photography in plastic surgery: the importance of standardization in the era of medicolegal issues.

Authors:  Achille Aveta; Angela Filoni; Paolo Persichetti
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Smartphone Usage Patterns by Canadian Neurosurgery Residents: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Michelle Masayo Kameda-Smith; Christian Iorio-Morin; Alexander Winkler-Schwartz; Uzair S Ahmed; David Bergeron; Mark Bigder; Ayoub Dakson; Cameron A Elliott; Daipayan Guha; Pascal Lavergne; Serge Makarenko; Michael S Taccone; Michael Tso; Bill Wang; David Fortin
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Clinical photography in dermatology: ethical and medico-legal considerations in the age of digital and smartphone technology.

Authors:  Lauren Kunde; Erin McMeniman; Malcolm Parker
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.875

9.  Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys.

Authors:  Ceara Tess Cunningham; Hude Quan; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Tom Noseworthy; Cynthia A Beck; Elijah Dixon; Susan Samuel; William A Ghali; Lindsay L Sykes; Nathalie Jetté
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Understanding the quality, effectiveness and attributes of top-rated smartphone health apps.

Authors:  Hannah Wisniewski; Gang Liu; Philip Henson; Aditya Vaidyam; Narissa Karima Hajratalli; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; John Torous
Journal:  Evid Based Ment Health       Date:  2019-01-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Patient Portal, Patient-Generated Images, and Medical Decision-Making in a Pediatric Ambulatory Setting.

Authors:  Karolin Ginting; Adrienne Stolfi; Jordan Wright; Abiodun Omoloja
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Good Comes From Evil: COVID-19 and the Advent of Telemedicine in Orthopedics.

Authors:  Joseph D Lamplot; Samuel A Taylor
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-02-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.