Literature DB >> 27452266

Adding the power of iodinated contrast media to the credibility of mammography in breast cancer diagnosis.

Alexandra Tsigginou1, Christina Gkali2, Athanasios Chalazonitis2, Eleni Feida2, Dimitrios Efthymios Vlachos3, Flora Zagouri4, Ioannis Rellias1, Constantine Dimitrakakis1.   

Abstract

Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) represents a relatively new diagnostic tool adjunct to mammography. The aim of this study was to strengthen the breast imaging-reporting and data system (BIRADS) classification score in order to improve early breast cancer diagnosis. For this reason, we propose a sum score, termed malignancy potential score (MPS), incorporating the standard BIRADS score and our proposed CESM score. From September 2014 to September 2015, 216 females (age range, 26-85 years; mean age 54.6 years) underwent CESM evaluation of mammographic findings that were primarily assessed as BIRADS 2-5. 10 of these patients had bilateral findings; a total of 226 lesions were examined. High-energy image evaluation was based on the intensity of contrast enhancement of the lesion compared with background enhancement, categorized as Type -1, 0, 1 or 2 enhancement. Histopathology reports were compared with imaging assessment. 98 of 226 lesions were malignant and 128 of 226 lesions were benign. The area under the curve was 0.843, 0.888 and 0.917 for mammographic BIRADS score, CESM score and MPS, respectively, with p-value < 0.05. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy rates were 91.83, 80.47 and 85.40%, respectively, when a best MPS cut-off point of 4 was used. The malignancy potential score (MPS) has higher diagnostic performance than digital mammography or CESM alone. MPS empowers the credibility of the digital mammography BIRADS score and our proposed type of enhancement in dual-energy CESM and is a diagnostic tool that increases the accuracy rate in early breast cancer diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27452266      PMCID: PMC5124843          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  14 in total

Review 1.  Variability and errors when applying the BIRADS mammography classification.

Authors:  Bruno Boyer; Sandra Canale; Julia Arfi-Rouche; Quentin Monzani; Wassef Khaled; Corinne Balleyguier
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  BIRADS classification in mammography.

Authors:  Corinne Balleyguier; Salma Ayadi; Kim Van Nguyen; Daniel Vanel; Clarisse Dromain; Robert Sigal
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Lactic acidosis. A presentation of metastatic breast cancer arising in pregnancy.

Authors:  T R Evans; R C Stein; H T Ford; J C Gazet; G V Chamberlain; R C Coombes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.

Authors:  E Tzamicha; E Yakoumakis; I A Tsalafoutas; A Dimitriadis; E Georgiou; V Tsapaki; A Chalazonitis
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Letter: Breast cancer arising in thoracotomy scars.

Authors:  H Freund; S Biran; N Laufer; Z Eyal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-01-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Authors:  M T Mandelson; N Oestreicher; P L Porter; D White; C A Finder; S H Taplin; E White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality.

Authors:  L Tabár; B Vitak; H H Chen; M F Yen; S W Duffy; R A Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Cancer statistics, 2013.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Contrast-enhanced mammography: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Julie Sogani; Victoria L Mango; Delia Keating; Janice S Sung; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 1.605

2.  Giant epidermal inclusion cyst with infection arising within the breast parenchyma: a case report.

Authors:  Yongxia Zhang; Lei Song; Han Zhang; Fengjie Liu; Guo Hao; Jing Liu; Haizhu Xie; Hao Shi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Association between quantitative and qualitative image features of contrast-enhanced mammography and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Simin Wang; Zhenxun Wang; Ruimin Li; Chao You; Ning Mao; Tingting Jiang; Zhongyi Wang; Haizhu Xie; Yajia Gu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

4.  Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for Detecting Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparison with Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Filipe Ramos Barra; Alaor Barra Sobrinho; Renato Ramos Barra; Mayra Teixeira Magalhães; Laira Rodrigues Aguiar; Gabriela Feitosa Lins de Albuquerque; Rodrigo Pepe Costa; Luciano Farage; Riccardo Pratesi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Correlation analysis between ultrasonography and mammography with other risk factors related to breast cancer.

Authors:  Wenxiao Zhang; Cui Xu; Rui Li; Guanghe Cui; Minmin Wang; Min Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Correlation Between Enhancement Intensity in Contrast Enhancement Spectral Mammography and Types of Kinetic Curves in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Wojciech Rudnicki; Sylwia Heinze; Tomasz Piegza; Marta Pawlak; Zbigniew Kojs; Elżbieta Łuczyńska
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-03-04

7.  Diagnostic value of the enhancement intensity and enhancement pattern of CESM to benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Chi; Lei Zhang; Dong Xing; Peiyou Gong; Qianqian Chen; Yongbin Lv
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.