Literature DB >> 17164080

BIRADS classification in mammography.

Corinne Balleyguier1, Salma Ayadi, Kim Van Nguyen, Daniel Vanel, Clarisse Dromain, Robert Sigal.   

Abstract

The Breast Imaging Report and Data System (BIRADS) of the American College of Radiology (ACR) is today largely used in most of the countries where breast cancer screening is implemented. It is a tool defined to reduce variability between radiologists when creating the reports in mammography, ultrasonography or MRI. Some changes in the last version of the BIRADStrade mark have been included to reduce the inaccuracy of some categories, especially for category 4. The BIRADStrade mark includes a lexicon and descriptive diagrams of the anomalies, recommendations for the mammographic report as well as councils and examples of mammographic cases. This review describes the mammographic items of the BIRADS classification with its more recent developments, while detailing the advantages and limits of this classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17164080     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  46 in total

1.  The influence of clinicopathological features on the predictive accuracy of conventional breast imaging in determining the extent of screen-detected high-grade pure ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  L Hayward; R S Oeppen; A V Grima; G T Royle; C M Rubin; R I Cutress
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Breast masses detection using phase portrait analysis and fuzzy inference systems.

Authors:  Arianna Mencattini; Marcello Salmeri
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  The Effect of Atorvastatin on Breast Cancer Biomarkers in High-Risk Women.

Authors:  YongLi Ji; Tiffany Rounds; Abigail Crocker; Betsy Sussman; Russell C Hovey; Fonda Kingsley; Hyman B Muss; Judy E Garber; Marie E Wood
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-02-23

4.  Workflow Lexicons in Healthcare: Validation of the SWIM Lexicon.

Authors:  Chris Meenan; Bradley Erickson; Nancy Knight; Jewel Fossett; Elizabeth Olsen; Prerna Mohod; Joseph Chen; Steve G Langer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Accuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison of digital mammography, tomosynthesis, ultrasound and MRI.

Authors:  Andrea Luparia; Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Stefano Ciatto; Davide Bosco; Pier Paolo Campanino; Isabella Castellano; Anna Sapino; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Follow-up of Lesions with Equivocal Radiotracer Uptake on PSMA-Targeted PET in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Predictive Values of the PSMA-RADS-3A and PSMA-RADS-3B Categories.

Authors:  Yafu Yin; Rudolf A Werner; Takahiro Higuchi; Constantin Lapa; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Mammotome(®) and EnCor (®): comparison of two systems for stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy in the characterisation of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications alone.

Authors:  Giovanna Mariscotti; Manuela Durando; Mattia Robella; Francesca Angelino; Elisa Regini; Pier Paolo Campanino; Marco Belletti; Silvia Osano; Laura Bergamasco; Paolo Fonio; Giovanni Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Adding the power of iodinated contrast media to the credibility of mammography in breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Alexandra Tsigginou; Christina Gkali; Athanasios Chalazonitis; Eleni Feida; Dimitrios Efthymios Vlachos; Flora Zagouri; Ioannis Rellias; Constantine Dimitrakakis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Mammographic features and histopathological findings of interval breast cancers.

Authors:  S Hofvind; B Geller; P Skaane
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  An assessment of the quality of mammography care at facilities treating medically vulnerable populations.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Goldman; Sebastien J-P A Haneuse; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Bonnie Yankaskas; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.