E Tzamicha1, E Yakoumakis2, I A Tsalafoutas3, A Dimitriadis2, E Georgiou2, V Tsapaki4, A Chalazonitis5. 1. Medical Physics Dpt., University of Athens, Greece. Electronic address: elsa-tzami@hotmail.com. 2. Medical Physics Dpt., University of Athens, Greece. 3. Athens General Anticancer-Oncology Hospital "Agios Savvas", Athens, Greece. 4. Medical Physics Dpt., Konstantopoulio General Hospital of Nea Ionia, Attiki, Greece. 5. Radiology Dpt., Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To estimate the mean glandular dose of contrast enhanced digital mammography, using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code and female adult voxel phantom. METHODS: Automatic exposure control of full field digital mammography system was used for the selection of the X-ray spectrum and the exposure settings for dual energy imaging. Measurements of the air-kerma and of the half value layers were performed and a Monte Carlo simulation of the digital mammography system was used to compute the mean glandular dose, for breast phantoms of various thicknesses, glandularities and for different X-ray spectra (low and high energy). RESULTS: For breast phantoms of 2.0-8.0 cm thick and 0.1-100% glandular fraction, CC view acquisition, from AEC settings, can result in a mean glandular dose of 0.450 ± 0.022 mGy -2.575 ± 0.033 mGy for low energy images and 0.061 ± 0.021 mGy - 0.232 ± 0.033 mGy for high energy images. In MLO view acquisition mean glandular dose values ranged between 0.488 ± 0.007 mGy - 2.080 ± 0.021 mGy for low energy images and 0.065 ± 0.012 mGy - 0.215 ± 0.010 mGy for high energy images. CONCLUSION: The low kV part of contrast enhanced digital mammography is the main contributor to total mean glandular breast dose. The results of this study can be used to provide an estimated mean glandular dose for individual cases.
PURPOSE: To estimate the mean glandular dose of contrast enhanced digital mammography, using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code and female adult voxel phantom. METHODS: Automatic exposure control of full field digital mammography system was used for the selection of the X-ray spectrum and the exposure settings for dual energy imaging. Measurements of the air-kerma and of the half value layers were performed and a Monte Carlo simulation of the digital mammography system was used to compute the mean glandular dose, for breast phantoms of various thicknesses, glandularities and for different X-ray spectra (low and high energy). RESULTS: For breast phantoms of 2.0-8.0 cm thick and 0.1-100% glandular fraction, CC view acquisition, from AEC settings, can result in a mean glandular dose of 0.450 ± 0.022 mGy -2.575 ± 0.033 mGy for low energy images and 0.061 ± 0.021 mGy - 0.232 ± 0.033 mGy for high energy images. In MLO view acquisition mean glandular dose values ranged between 0.488 ± 0.007 mGy - 2.080 ± 0.021 mGy for low energy images and 0.065 ± 0.012 mGy - 0.215 ± 0.010 mGy for high energy images. CONCLUSION: The low kV part of contrast enhanced digital mammography is the main contributor to total mean glandular breast dose. The results of this study can be used to provide an estimated mean glandular dose for individual cases.