Literature DB >> 27450208

A comparison of endoscopic localization error rate between operating surgeons and referring endoscopists in colorectal cancer.

Arash Azin1, Fady Saleh2,3, Michelle Cleghorn3, Andrew Yuen1, Timothy Jackson1,3, Allan Okrainec1,3, Fayez A Quereshy4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) has a localization error rate as high as 21 %. Such errors can have substantial clinical consequences, particularly in laparoscopic surgery. The primary objective of this study was to compare accuracy of tumor localization at initial endoscopy performed by either the operating surgeon or non-operating referring endoscopist.
METHODS: All patients who underwent surgical resection for CRC at a large tertiary academic hospital between January 2006 and August 2014 were identified. The exposure of interest was the initial endoscopist: (1) surgeon who also performed the definitive operation (operating surgeon group); and (2) referring gastroenterologist or general surgeon (referring endoscopist group). The outcome measure was localization error, defined as a difference in at least one anatomic segment between initial endoscopy and final operative location. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the association between localization error rate and the initial endoscopist.
RESULTS: A total of 557 patients were included in the study; 81 patients in the operating surgeon cohort and 476 patients in the referring endoscopist cohort. Initial diagnostic colonoscopy performed by the operating surgeon compared to referring endoscopist demonstrated statistically significant lower intraoperative localization error rate (1.2 vs. 9.0 %, P = 0.016); shorter mean time from endoscopy to surgery (52.3 vs. 76.4 days, P = 0.015); higher tattoo localization rate (32.1 vs. 21.0 %, P = 0.027); and lower preoperative repeat endoscopy rate (8.6 vs. 40.8 %, P < 0.001). Initial endoscopy performed by the operating surgeon was protective against localization error on both univariate analysis, OR 7.94 (95 % CI 1.08-58.52; P = 0.016), and multivariate analysis, OR 7.97 (95 % CI 1.07-59.38; P = 0.043).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that diagnostic colonoscopies performed by an operating surgeon are independently associated with a lower localization error rate. Further research exploring the factors influencing localization accuracy and why operating surgeons have lower error rates relative to non-operating endoscopists is necessary to understand differences in care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Endoscopy; Tumor localization

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27450208     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5114-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

1.  Rate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based study.

Authors:  Harminder Singh; Zoann Nugent; Alain A Demers; Charles N Bernstein
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Preoperative re-endoscopy in colorectal cancer patients: an institutional experience and analysis of influencing factors.

Authors:  Thamer Al Abbasi; Fady Saleh; Timothy D Jackson; Allan Okrainec; Fayez A Quereshy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Correlation between preoperative endoscopic and intraoperative findings in localizing colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Martine Adam Louis; Kalyana Nandipati; Rakel Astorga; Anupa Mandava; Carl-P Rousseau; Neil Mandava
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Role of endoscopy in the staging and management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher; Amandeep K Shergill; Dayna S Early; Ruben D Acosta; Vinay Chandrasekhara; Krishnavel V Chathadi; G Anton Decker; John A Evans; Robert D Fanelli; Kimberly Q Foley; Lisa Fonkalsrud; Joo Ha Hwang; Terry Jue; Mouen A Khashab; Jenifer R Lightdale; V Raman Muthusamy; Shabana F Pasha; John R Saltzman; Ravi Sharaf; Brooks D Cash
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Carol Desantis; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Steve Halligan; Riccardo Marmo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Accuracy of colon tumor localization: Computed tomography scanning as a complement to colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jessica Lee; Anthony Voytovich; William Pennoyer; Kristy Thurston; Robert A Kozol
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-27

8.  Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Rinku Sutradhar; Shawn S Forbes; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Yong Beom Cho; Woo Yong Lee; Hae Ran Yun; Won Suk Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Wendy Atkin; Edward Dadswell; Kate Wooldrage; Ines Kralj-Hans; Christian von Wagner; Rob Edwards; Guiqing Yao; Clive Kay; David Burling; Omar Faiz; Julian Teare; Richard J Lilford; Dion Morton; Jane Wardle; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic utility of staging abdominal computerized tomography and repeat endoscopy in detecting localization errors at initial endoscopy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Arash Azin; Trevor Wood; Dhruvin Hirpara; Emily Le Souder; Sami A Chadi; Timothy Jackson; Allan Okrainec; Fayez A Quereshy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Rates and predictors of repeat preoperative endoscopy for elective colorectal resections: how can we avoid repeated procedures?

Authors:  Olivia Hershorn; Jason Park; Harminder Singh; Kathleen Clouston; Ashley Vergis; Ramzi M Helewa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Preoperative repeat endoscopy for colorectal cancer: What is its role and when is it necessary?

Authors:  Woo Jin Choi; Michelle C Cleghorn; Fayez A Quereshy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Preoperative Localization in Colonic Surgery (PLoCoS Study): a multicentric experience on behalf of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).

Authors:  Michele Manigrasso; Marco Milone; Mario Musella; Pietro Venetucci; Francesco Maione; Ugo Elmore; Gaetano Gallo; Roberto Perinotti; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.