Literature DB >> 2744900

Radiation dose and breast cancer risk in patients treated for cancer of the cervix.

J D Boice1, M Blettner, R A Kleinerman, G Engholm, M Stovall, H Lisco, D F Austin, A Bosch, L Harlan, E T Krementz, H B Latouret, J A Merril, L J Petters, M D Schulz, J Wactawski, H H Storm, E Björkholm, F Pettersson, C M Bell, M P Coleman, P Fraser, F E Neal, P Prior, N W Choi, T G Hislop, M Koch, N Kreiger, D Robb, D Robson, D H Thomson, H Lochmüller, D von Fournier, R Frischkorn, K E Kjørstad, A Rimpela, M H Pejovic, V P Kirn, H Stankusova, P Pisani, K Sigurdsson, G B Hutchison, B MacMahon.   

Abstract

The relationship between breast cancer and radiation treatment for cervical cancer was evaluated in an international study of 953 women who subsequently developed breast cancer and 1,806 matched controls. Radiation doses to the breast (average 0.31 Gy) and ovaries (average 32 Gy) were reconstructed for exposed subjects on the basis of their original radiotherapy records. Overall, 88% of the breast cancer cases and 89% of the controls received radiation treatment [relative risk (RR) = 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7-1.2]. Among women with intact ovaries (561 cases, 1,037 controls), radiotherapy was linked to a significant 35% reduction in breast cancer risk, attributable in all likelihood to the cessation of ovarian function. Ovarian doses of 6 Gy were sufficient to reduce breast cancer risk but larger doses did not reduce risk further. This saturation-type response is probably due to the killing of a critical number of ovarian cells. Cervical cancer patients without ovaries (145 cases, 284 controls) were analyzed separately because such women are at especially low natural risk for breast cancer development. In theory, any effect of low-dose breast exposure, received incidentally during treatment for cervical cancer, should be more readily detectable. Among women without ovaries, there was a slight increase in breast cancer risk (RR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.6-2.0), and a suggestion of a dose response with the RR being 1.0, 0.7, 1.5 and 3.1 for breast doses of 0, 0.01-0.24, 0.25-0.49 and 0.50+ Gy, respectively. However, this trend of increasing RR was not statistically significant. If low-dose radiation increases the risk of breast cancer among women over age 40 years, it appears that the risk is much lower than would be predicted from studies of younger women exposed to higher doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2744900     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910440103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  7 in total

1.  [Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks].

Authors:  E A Nekolla; J Griebel; G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Breast cancer risk following radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: modification by other risk factors.

Authors:  Deirdre A Hill; Ethel Gilbert; Graça M Dores; Mary Gospodarowicz; Flora E van Leeuwen; Eric Holowaty; Bengt Glimelius; Michael Andersson; Tom Wiklund; Charles F Lynch; Mars Van't Veer; Hans Storm; Eero Pukkala; Marilyn Stovall; Rochelle E Curtis; James M Allan; John D Boice; Lois B Travis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Radiation-Related New Primary Solid Cancers in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: Comparative Radiation Dose Response and Modification of Treatment Effects.

Authors:  Peter D Inskip; Alice J Sigurdson; Lene Veiga; Parveen Bhatti; Cécile Ronckers; Preetha Rajaraman; Houda Boukheris; Marilyn Stovall; Susan Smith; Sue Hammond; Tara O Henderson; Tanya C Watt; Ann C Mertens; Wendy Leisenring; Kayla Stratton; John Whitton; Sarah S Donaldson; Gregory T Armstrong; Leslie L Robison; Joseph P Neglia
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Pelvic radiotherapy, sex hormones, and breast cancer.

Authors:  P D Inskip
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Second cancers after squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  Anil K Chaturvedi; Ruth A Kleinerman; Allan Hildesheim; Ethel S Gilbert; Hans Storm; Charles F Lynch; Per Hall; Froydis Langmark; Eero Pukkala; Magnus Kaijser; Michael Andersson; Sophie D Fossa; Heikki Joensuu; Lois B Travis; Eric A Engels
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Cancer mortality following radiotherapy for benign gynecologic disorders.

Authors:  Ritsu Sakata; Ruth A Kleinerman; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Marilyn Stovall; Susan A Smith; Rita Weathers; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Diane L Cookfair; John D Boice; Peter D Inskip
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Secondary Primary Malignancy Risk in Patients With Cervical Cancer in Taiwan: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Chung-Jen Teng; Leh-Kiong Huon; Yu-Wen Hu; Chiu-Mei Yeh; Yee Chao; Muh-Hwa Yang; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Yi-Ping Hung; Chia-Jen Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.