Magdy Younes1,2,3, Patrick J Hanly2. 1. YRT Ltd, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 2. Sleep Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 3. Sleep Disorders Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Inter-scorer variability in sleep staging of polysomnograms (PSGs) results primarily from difficulty in determining whether: (1) an electroencephalogram pattern of wakefulness spans > 15 sec in transitional epochs, (2) spindles or K complexes are present, and (3) duration of delta waves exceeds 6 sec in a 30-sec epoch. We hypothesized that providing digitally derived information about these variables to PSG scorers may reduce inter-scorer variability. METHODS: Fifty-six PSGs were scored (five-stage) by two experienced technologists, (first manual, M1). Months later, the technologists edited their own scoring (second manual, M2). PSGs were then scored with an automatic system and the same two technologists and an additional experienced technologist edited them, epoch-by-epoch (Edited-Auto). This resulted in seven manual scores for each PSG. The two M2 scores were then independently modified using digitally obtained values for sleep depth and delta duration and digitally identified spindles and K complexes. RESULTS: Percent agreement between scorers in M2 was 78.9 ± 9.0% before modification and 96.5 ± 2.6% after. Errors of this approach were defined as a change in a manual score to a stage that was not assigned by any scorer during the seven manual scoring sessions. Total errors averaged 7.1 ± 3.7% and 6.9 ± 3.8% of epochs for scorers 1 and 2, respectively, and there was excellent agreement between the modified score and the initial manual score of each technologist. CONCLUSIONS: Providing digitally obtained information about sleep depth, delta duration, spindles and K complexes during manual scoring can greatly reduce interrater variability in sleep staging by eliminating the guesswork in scoring epochs with equivocal features.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Inter-scorer variability in sleep staging of polysomnograms (PSGs) results primarily from difficulty in determining whether: (1) an electroencephalogram pattern of wakefulness spans > 15 sec in transitional epochs, (2) spindles or K complexes are present, and (3) duration of delta waves exceeds 6 sec in a 30-sec epoch. We hypothesized that providing digitally derived information about these variables to PSG scorers may reduce inter-scorer variability. METHODS: Fifty-six PSGs were scored (five-stage) by two experienced technologists, (first manual, M1). Months later, the technologists edited their own scoring (second manual, M2). PSGs were then scored with an automatic system and the same two technologists and an additional experienced technologist edited them, epoch-by-epoch (Edited-Auto). This resulted in seven manual scores for each PSG. The two M2 scores were then independently modified using digitally obtained values for sleep depth and delta duration and digitally identified spindles and K complexes. RESULTS: Percent agreement between scorers in M2 was 78.9 ± 9.0% before modification and 96.5 ± 2.6% after. Errors of this approach were defined as a change in a manual score to a stage that was not assigned by any scorer during the seven manual scoring sessions. Total errors averaged 7.1 ± 3.7% and 6.9 ± 3.8% of epochs for scorers 1 and 2, respectively, and there was excellent agreement between the modified score and the initial manual score of each technologist. CONCLUSIONS: Providing digitally obtained information about sleep depth, delta duration, spindles and K complexes during manual scoring can greatly reduce interrater variability in sleep staging by eliminating the guesswork in scoring epochs with equivocal features.
Authors: Stephen D Pittman; Mary M MacDonald; Robert B Fogel; Atul Malhotra; Koby Todros; Baruch Levy; Amir B Geva; David P White Journal: Sleep Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Sabrina L Wendt; Julie A E Christensen; Jacob Kempfner; Helle L Leonthin; Poul Jennum; Helge B D Sorensen Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2012
Authors: Atul Malhotra; Magdy Younes; Samuel T Kuna; Ruth Benca; Clete A Kushida; James Walsh; Alexandra Hanlon; Bethany Staley; Allan I Pack; Grace W Pien Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Xiaozhe Zhang; Xiaosong Dong; Jan W Kantelhardt; Jing Li; Long Zhao; Carmen Garcia; Martin Glos; Thomas Penzel; Fang Han Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Heidi Danker-Hopfe; D Kunz; G Gruber; G Klösch; J L Lorenzo; S L Himanen; B Kemp; T Penzel; J Röschke; H Dorn; A Schlögl; E Trenker; G Dorffner Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: Simon C Warby; Sabrina L Wendt; Peter Welinder; Emil G S Munk; Oscar Carrillo; Helge B D Sorensen; Poul Jennum; Paul E Peppard; Pietro Perona; Emmanuel Mignot Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2014-02-23 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Magdy Younes; Samuel T Kuna; Allan I Pack; James K Walsh; Clete A Kushida; Bethany Staley; Grace W Pien Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: H Kloefkorn; L M Aiani; A Lakhani; S Nagesh; A Moss; W Goolsby; J M Rehg; N P Pedersen; S Hochman Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Daniel J Levendowski; Luigi Ferini-Strambi; Charlene Gamaldo; Mindy Cetel; Robert Rosenberg; Philip R Westbrook Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Anna Ricci; Susan L Calhoun; Fan He; Jidong Fang; Alexandros N Vgontzas; Duanping Liao; Edward O Bixler; Magdy Younes; Julio Fernandez-Mendoza Journal: Sleep Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 6.313
Authors: Cathy A Goldstein; Richard B Berry; David T Kent; David A Kristo; Azizi A Seixas; Susan Redline; M Brandon Westover Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Anna Ricci; Fan He; Jidong Fang; Susan L Calhoun; Alexandros N Vgontzas; Duanping Liao; Magdy Younes; Edward O Bixler; Julio Fernandez-Mendoza Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 4.842