Literature DB >> 27446303

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery.

Ronghua Liu1, Lin Lin1, Dujuan Wang1.   

Abstract

Antimicrobial prophylaxis is used routinely for pre-, intra- and post-operative caesarean section. One of the most important risk factors for postpartum infection is caesarean delivery. Caesarean section shows a higher incidence of infection than vaginal delivery. It is complicated by surgical site infections, endometritis or urinary tract infection. The aim of the present study was to assess the usage of antimicrobials in women undergoing caesarean section at a Tertiary Care Hospital. A prospective study was conducted in 100 women during the period of February 2013 to August 2013 in the inpatient Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. Data collected included the age of the patient, gravidity, and type of caesarean section, which was analyzed for the nature and number of antimicrobials prescribed, duration of treatment, polypharmacy, fixed-dose combinations, generic/brand names used and failure of prophylaxis. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was administered to the patients. The most commonly prescribed antimicrobial was a combination of ceftriaxone and sulbactam. Of 100 patients, 87% were aged 20-35 years. The highest proportion of patients were primigravida 72%. Elective procedure was carried out in 38%, the remaining were emergency C-section in whom intra- and post-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis was given for a duration of 7 days. In total, 27% of patients were reported with infection even after the antimicrobial prophylaxis. In conclusion, pre-operative prophylaxis was given in the early rupture of membranes. Fixed-dose combinations were preferred. Incidence of infection even after antimicrobial prophylaxis was reported due to pre-existing infection, debilitating disease or prolonged rupture of membranes. Patients with recurrent infection were shifted to amoxicillin and clavulinic acid combination. Drugs were prescribed only by brand names which is of concern.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antimicrobial prophylaxis; caesarean section; drug utilization; surgical site infections

Year:  2016        PMID: 27446303      PMCID: PMC4950587          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


Introduction

Antimicrobials are commonly prescribed in Obstetrics and Gynaecology prophylactically for pre-operative and post-operative procedures (1) (caesarean section, episiotomy, medical termination of pregnancy, total vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy, laparoscopic procedures, tubal ligation, dilatation and curettage, and myomectomy) or to treat ongoing infection (vaginitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis, sexually transmitted diseases and urinary tract infections). The rational use of antimicrobials in women of the child-bearing age group is important because it affects this population as well as their offspring. Indiscriminate use of antibiotics may result in the appearance of drug-resistant organisms (2). Drug utilization is defined by the WHO as ‘The marketing, distribution, prescription, and use of drugs in society, with special emphasis on the resulting medical, social, and economic consequences’. A drug utilization study is therefore one designed to describe quantitatively and qualitatively the use of a given drug, i.e., class of drugs, indications, duration of treatment, dosage, previous or associated treatments and compliance (3,4). Surgical site infections are a common complication of obstetric and gynaecological procedures. The use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for caesarean section has been shown to be effective in reducing postoperative morbidity, cost and duration of hospitalization (5–8). Antimicrobial usage in the above setting becomes inevitable but should be restricted. The judicious use of these drugs can prevent post-partum infection of the mother and neonate and reduce incidence of adverse drug reactions. The present study was performed to assess the usage of antimicrobials in 100 women undergoing caesarean section

Materials and methods

A prospective study of 100 prescriptions of women attending the inpatient and outpatient Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People's Hospital of Linyi (Shandong, China), a Tertiary Care Hospital during the period of February 2013 to August 2013 was conducted. Prior to start of the study Institutional Ethics Committee approval was obtained. The prescriptions were analyzed using WHO core drug use indicators including average number of drugs per encounter, percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name, percentage of drugs prescribed from the essential drug list, patient care and availability of drugs (4). The data collected were analyzed for the following para-meters: i) age of patient; ii) gravidity; iii) type of caesarean section - (elective/emergency); iv) number of drugs per prescription; v) class of antimicrobials; vi) duration of antimicrobial treatment; vii) average number of antimicrobials prescribed; viii) polypharmacy; ix) number of fixed-dose combinations prescribed; x) generic/brand name prescribed; and xi) failure of prophylaxis.

Results

Of 100 patients, 87% were in the age group of 20–35 years, 21% were in the age group of 20–25 years, 39% were in the age group of 26–30 years, 27% were in the age group of 31–35 years and the remaining 13% were in the age group of 36–39 years (Fig. 1). The highest proportion of patients was primigravida (72%) (Fig. 2). Elective C-sections were carried out in 38% of cases and the remaining were emergency C-section in whom intra- and post-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis was received for a duration of 7 days (Fig. 3). Antimicrobial prophylaxis was given to all the patients, while the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial was a combination of ceftriaxone and sulbactam (Fig. 4). Patients who were reported with infection even after antimicrobial prophylaxis were 27% (Fig. 5).
Figure 1.

Maternal age at delivery. Highest proportions of patients were primigravida 72%. Elective caesarean section was carried out in 38%, and the remaining were emergency cases. Intra- and post-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis was given in both settings of patients for a duration of 7–12 days. Intra-operative prophylaxis was associated in patients with long duration of rupture of membranes. Patients who underwent the elective procedure received pre-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Figure 2.

Type of gravida. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was prescribed to all the patients. The total number of antimicrobials prescribed post-operatively, during hospital stay, discharge and after suture removal ranged between 4 and 8 (average 5).

Figure 3.

Type of C-section. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were ceftriaxone, sulbactam, amikacin, metronidazole, satranidazole, amoxicillin, clavulanic acid, ciprofoxacin and tinidazole. The most commonly prescribed fixed-dose combinations were the ceftriaxone and sulbactam combination, amoxicillin and clavulinic acid combination and ciprofoxacin and tinidazole combination. A total of 214 fxed-dose combinations were prescribed. The prescriptions were prescribed by brand names.

Figure 4.

Class of antimicrobials prescribed.

Figure 5.

Complications due to failure of antibiotic prophylaxis.

Post-partum endometritis develops usually in patients undergoing caesarean section, after labour or rupture of membranes despite the use of prophylactic antibiotics (9). Therapeutic use of antimicrobials was ‘empirical’. Patients who were reported with infection even after antimicrobial prophylaxis were 17% of which 2% were diagnosed with post-partum endometritis, 8% with wound infection and 7% with urinary tract infection (10,11). The patients with failure of antimicrobial prophylaxis were shifted to other regimens following empiric treatment (Tables I and II).
Table I.

Number of antimicrobials prescribed per patient.

No. of antimicrobialsPercentage of use
4  6
522
628
713
816
9 or more15
Table II.

Antepartum complications.

Antepartum complicationsNo. of patients
Antepartum infections17
Gestational diabetes  5
Antepartum anemia44

Discussion

The largest number of patients in the present study was in the age group of 26–30 years. The age distribution is a reflection of the demographic status of the community as the majority of women tend to complete their families during this period. The emergency lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) group formed over 50% of the study participants. It is important to opt for elective procedures, where feasible, as it provides the opportunity to have a clean operative field (12,13). LSCS were performed under antimicrobial prophylaxis to avoid post-operative morbidity. This reflects that, in general, the practice in the audit setting is evidence-based. Regardless of the antibiotic regimen used, the protective effect of prophylactic antibiotics was homogeneous across all the patients undergoing caesarean section. This effect of significant reduction in postoperative infectious morbidity (by around two thirds) led the reviewers to recommend that antibiotic prophylaxis be provided to all the women undergoing caesarean section. All the patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis, which is good clinical practice and comparable to international standards of evidence-based practice worldwide. The reduction in post-operative infection-related morbidity, in turn, is cost effective as it reduces the number of days the patient has to stay in hospital. Additionally, it reduces the incidence of hospital-acquired infections and infection with more resistant microorganisms. The most frequent microbes isolated from endometrial cultures of women with post-caesarean wound infections are staphylococci, enterococci, anaerobes and ureaplasmas (14–17). Furthermore, when specifically identified, ureaplasma (or Mycoplasma genus) is the most common organism isolated from the amniotic fluid and chorioamnion at caesarean delivery, and is associated with a 3- to 8-fold increased risk of post-caesarean endometritis or wound infection (18,19). Bacterial vaginosis is also associated with an increased risk of post-caesarean endometritis. Therefore, the recommended regimen of ceftriaxone alone does not cover frequent isolates or risk factors of such infection. Thus, use of an extended spectrum regimen involving a second antibiotic metronidazole was used (9,20,21). In conclusion, antimicrobial prophylaxis was given routinely to all 100 patients undergoing caesarean section pre-operatively, intra-operatively and post-operatively. Use of prophylactic antibiotics for patients undergoing caesarean section has significantly reduced post-operative maternal infection, morbidity and hospital stay (22,23). Pre-operative prophylaxis was given in the early rupture of membranes. Fixed-dose combinations were used, the most common being ceftriaxone and sulbactam combination. Incidence of infection even after antimicrobial prophylaxis was reported due to pre-existing infection, debilitating disease or prolonged rupture of membranes. Patients with recurrent infection were shifted to a regime that included amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin and tinidazole combination and the duration of treatment was prolonged (24). Patients with failure of antimicrobial prophylaxis were treated following the change in antimicrobial regimen, prolonging the duration of treatment and dilatation and curettage in 2% of the patients who reported with post-partum endometritis. Drugs were prescribed only by brand names which is of concern, generic drug prescribing is recommended and would enhance cost-effectiveness. Use of certain antimicrobials (fluoroquinolones and nitro-imidazole) not recommended in lactating mothers could have been avoided. Since the patients with failure of antimicrobial prophylaxis received ‘empiric’ treatment, antibiotic culture sensitivity testing is recommended prior to introducing a change in the antimicrobial treatment regimen, to exclude antibiotic resistance.
  23 in total

1.  Prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section.

Authors:  William J Ledger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Evidence behind the WHO guidelines: hospital care for children: what is the role of prophylactic antibiotics in the management of burns?

Authors:  Francis Lee; Patrick Wong; Fiona Hill; David Burgner; Russell Taylor
Journal:  J Trop Pediatr       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 1.165

3.  Antibiotics prescribed before, during and after pregnancy in the Netherlands: a drug utilization study.

Authors:  Linda de Jonge; H Jens Bos; Irene M van Langen; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg; Marian K Bakker
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 4.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetric and gynaecological procedures: a review.

Authors:  Vanessa Clifford; Andrew Daley
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.100

5.  Uterine flora at cesarean and its relationship to postpartum endometritis.

Authors:  D Sherman; S Lurie; M Betzer; Y Pinhasi; S Arieli; I Boldur
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Current debate on the use of antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section.

Authors:  R F Lamont; J D Sobel; J P Kusanovic; E Vaisbuch; S Mazaki-Tovi; S K Kim; N Uldbjerg; R Romero
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 7.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.

Authors:  Fiona M Smaill; Rosalie M Grivell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-28

8.  Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for post-cesarean endometritis.

Authors:  D H Watts; M A Krohn; S L Hillier; D A Eschenbach
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Prophylactic antibiotic prescription for cesarean section.

Authors:  Tippawan Liabsuetrakul; Pisake Lumbiganon; Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 10.  Emerging concepts in antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Dwight J Rouse; Sean Blackwell; George R Saade; Catherine Y Spong; William W Andrews
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Human Milk Microbiota: Transferring the Antibiotic Resistome to Infants.

Authors:  Lahari Das; Richa Virmani; Vishal Sharma; Deepti Rawat; Yogendra Singh
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 2.  Allergic diseases in infancy: I - Epidemiology and current interpretation.

Authors:  Isabella Annesi-Maesano; Manja Fleddermann; Mathias Hornef; Erika von Mutius; Oliver Pabst; Monika Schaubeck; Alessandro Fiocchi
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.084

3.  Factors Associated With the Microbiome in Moderate-Late Preterm Babies: A Cohort Study From the DIAMOND Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Clara Yieh Lin Chong; Tommi Vatanen; Tanith Alexander; Frank H Bloomfield; Justin M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.293

4.  A prospective study to evaluate antimicrobial prescribing pattern among admitted patients in hilly Himalayan region of northern India.

Authors:  Gandham Ravi; Gaurav Chikara; Arkapal Bandyopadhyay; Shailendra Handu
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-29

5.  Effect of vaginal antiseptic prior to caesarean section on the rate of post-caesarean complications: a blinded randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Monika Trivedi; Ainsley M Robinson; Md Rafiqul Islam
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.