Literature DB >> 2296423

Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for post-cesarean endometritis.

D H Watts1, M A Krohn, S L Hillier, D A Eschenbach.   

Abstract

Bacterial species associated with bacterial vaginosis have been isolated more frequently from endometrial cultures of patients with postpartum endometritis than expected from the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women. To further assess the association between bacterial vaginosis and postpartum endometritis, vaginal Gram smears were obtained from women admitted for delivery. Vaginal smears of women delivered by cesarean were scored as normal or as indicating bacterial vaginosis. Factors related independently to postpartum endometritis by multiple logistic regression analysis included maternal age less than 25 years, any duration of membrane rupture, and bacterial vaginosis. The unadjusted odds ratio for the development of postpartum endometritis associated with bacterial vaginosis (odds ratio = 6.1, 95% confidence interval 3.3-15.9) was not appreciably changed in the multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 5.8, 95% confidence interval 3.0-10.9) after adjusting for maternal age, duration of labor, and duration of membrane rupture. At the time of endometritis, Bacteroides sp, Peptostreptococcus sp, and Gardnerella vaginalis were isolated more frequently from the endometrium using a triple lumen endometrial sampling method among patients with bacterial vaginosis than among those with a normal Gram stain. Bacterial vaginosis appears to be an important risk factor for postpartum endometritis after cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2296423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  60 in total

1.  Factors linked to bacterial vaginosis in nonpregnant women.

Authors:  C Holzman; J M Leventhal; H Qiu; N M Jones; J Wang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Gynecologic Complications of Bacterial Vaginosis: Fact or Fiction?

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  C A Spiegel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Women's experiences of general practitioner management of their vaginal symptoms.

Authors:  T C O'Dowd; S Parker; A Kelly
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  The role of urogenital tract infections in the etiology of preterm birth: a review.

Authors:  J Martius; T Roos
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  S1-Guideline on Bacterial Vaginosis in Gynecology and Obstetrics: Long version - AWMF Guideline, registration no. 015/028, July 2013 Langfassung - AWMF-Register Nr. 015/028, Juli 2013.

Authors:  W Mendling; J Martius; U B Hoyme
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  A Prospective Cohort Study of the Association Between Body Mass Index and Incident Bacterial Vaginosis.

Authors:  Erica M Lokken; Barbra A Richardson; John Kinuthia; Khamis Mwinyikai; Amina Abdalla; Walter Jaoko; Kishorchandra Mandaliya; Juma Shafi; R Scott McClelland
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  The laboratory diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Deborah Money
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Treatment of bacterial vaginosis with a three day course of 2% clindamycin vaginal cream: a pilot study.

Authors:  J Dhar; O P Arya; D J Timmins; S Moss; S Mukembo; A B Alawattegama; O Williams
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-04

10.  Identification of two new antigenic subgroups within the genus Mobiluncus.

Authors:  J R Schwebke; S A Lukehart; M C Roberts; S L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.