Literature DB >> 27444034

What Is the Natural History of Asymptomatic Pseudotumors in Metal-on-metal THAs at Mid-term Followup?

Sujith Konan1, Clive P Duncan2, Bassam S Masri2, Donald S Garbuz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of early revision because of pseudotumors in patients who have undergone large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is well documented. However, the natural history of asymptomatic pseudotumors or of MoM articulations without pseudotumors is less well understood. The aim of our study was to investigate the natural history of primary MoM THA at mid-term followup. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were: (1) Did previously detected pseudotumors persist or worsen in asymptomatic patients at mid-term followup; and if so, did any of them require revision THA? (2) Did new pseudotumors form in asymptomatic patients at mid-term followup? (3) What happened to serum trace metal ions at mid-term followup? (4) Were postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) maintained at mid-term followup?
METHODS: Seventy-one patients who underwent a MoM THA using a Metasul LDH implant with a Durom acetabular cup and an M/L Taper stem between September 2005 and October 2008 were reviewed. All patients for this study were part of two previously published studies from our early followup. Data from the previous studies were used for comparison only. Two of the 71 patients (2.8%) were lost to followup. The mean age at operation was 56 years (range, 34-68 years). There were 24 female patients. All patients had serum trace metal ions testing, ultrasound imaging, and PROMs at a mean 3.5 years (early followup) after the index operation (range, 3-5 years) and delayed followup at a mean 7 years (range, 6.5-9 years). The indication to undertake revision THA was based on clinical evaluation and not solely on the investigation results.
RESULTS: Twenty-three of 71 patients (32%) had a positive ultrasound scan for pseudotumor at early followup. Of these, eight patients underwent revision THA (11% of MoM THA or 35% of patients with an early positive ultrasound scan). The mean time between positive ultrasound scan and revision surgery was 13 months (range, 5-22 months). Of the remaining 15 patients with pseudotumor noted on early ultrasound, 12 had persistent pseudotumor, two resolved, and one was lost to followup. Six patients (13%) with a normal ultrasound scan at early followup showed new ultrasound findings at delayed followup. Of these, four (8%) were conclusively diagnosed as pseudotumor and one was revised. Serum trace metal ion increased at mid-term followup in the seven cases that showed an increase in volume of pseudotumor. Of the five patients in whom the volume of pseudotumor decreased on ultrasound at mid-term followup, three showed a decrease in serum trace ions levels, whereas two showed an increase. New-onset pseudotumors at mid-term followup was associated with an increase in serum trace metal ions at mid-term followup only in two of six cases. PROMs at mid-term followup of patients in this study remain high.
CONCLUSIONS: At mid-term followup, approximately 35% of patients who develop an early pseudotumor undergo revision arthroplasty, whereas the remaining are asymptomatic. The incidence of new-onset ultrasound findings suggestive of pseudotumors at mid- to long-term followup is approximately 8% and these require continued surveillance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27444034      PMCID: PMC5213933          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4981-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  27 in total

1.  Arthroprosthetic cobaltism: neurological and cardiac manifestations in two patients with metal-on-metal arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Stephen S Tower
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  "Asymptomatic" pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence and metal ion study.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Simon J Ostlere; Peter McLardy-Smith; Nicholas A Athanasou; Harinderjit S Gill; David W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Chromosomal aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients with metal-on-metal hip bearings.

Authors:  E Dunstan; D Ladon; P Whittingham-Jones; R Carrington; T W R Briggs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Inflammatory pseudotumor associated with femoral nerve palsy following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip. A case report.

Authors:  Robert A E Clayton; Ian Beggs; Donald M Salter; M Helen Grant; James T Patton; Daniel E Porter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  A prospective metal ion study of large-head metal-on-metal bearing: a matched-pair analysis of hip resurfacing versus total hip replacement.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Paul R Kim; Amre Hamdi; Anna Fazekas
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements.

Authors:  A P Davies; H G Willert; P A Campbell; I D Learmonth; C P Case
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Cobalt and chromium levels in blood and urine following hip resurfacing arthroplasty with the Conserve Plus implant.

Authors:  Paul R Kim; Paul E Beaulé; Michael Dunbar; Joshua K L Lee; Nicholas Birkett; Michelle C Turner; Nagarajkumar Yenugadhati; Vic Armstrong; Daniel Krewski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Anatomic diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Steven A Stuchin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings.

Authors:  H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07

10.  Pseudotumour incidence, cobalt levels and clinical outcome after large head metal-on-metal and conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: mid-term results of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  H C van der Veen; I H F Reininga; W P Zijlstra; M F Boomsma; S K Bulstra; J J A M van Raay
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  5 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What Is the Clinical Presentation of Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty? An MRI Study.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Mechanisms of Adverse Local Tissue Reactions to Hip Implants.

Authors:  Felipe Eltit; Qiong Wang; Rizhi Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-07-30

3.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Radiological Outcomes and Bone Remodeling Outcomes Between Proximal Coated Single-Wedge New Stem and Full Coated Dual-Wedge Classic Stem in 1-Stage Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hongpeng Hu; Zeming Liu; Bo Liu; Xuzhuang Ding; Sikai Liu; Tao Wu; Wenhui Ma; Yongtai Han
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-01-31

4.  Comparison of Femoral Bone Mineral Density Changes around 3 Common Designs of Cementless Stems after Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Wen-Xing Wei; Yi Zeng; Jun Ma; Jing Yang; Bin Shen
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  A new strategy to reconstruct type III acetabular bone defect associated with inflammatory pseudotumor: combined medial and lateral acetabular bone grafting: A case report.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Dejiu Wang; Jiang Du; Zhen Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.