Literature DB >> 18310701

Chromosomal aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients with metal-on-metal hip bearings.

E Dunstan1, D Ladon, P Whittingham-Jones, R Carrington, T W R Briggs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately one-third of patients undergoing joint replacement are under sixty years of age. Many of these patients may be exposed to wear debris from the orthopaedic implant for several decades. Clinical follow-up of this group of patients has been short compared with the lifetimes of the patients, and the long-term effects of this chronic exposure are unknown.
METHODS: By using cytogenetic biomarkers (twenty-four-color fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH]), we analyzed the peripheral blood leukocytes for chromosomal aberrations in three groups of subjects: (1) six age and sex-matched control subjects who had no implant and did not smoke (control group), (2) five subjects in whom an implant with a metal-on-metal articulation had been in situ for an average of thirty-five years (metal-on-metal group), and (3) four subjects in whom a metal-on-metal implant had been revised to a metal-on-polyethylene articulation at an average of twenty-two years (revised group).
RESULTS: The number of chromosomal aberrations in the metal-on-metal group was greater than that in the control group. Specifically, the percentage of aneuploidy gain was three times greater (p = 0.01) in the metal-on-metal group. Structural aberrations were not seen in the control group, and this difference was highly significant (p = 0.003). Also, the number of chromosomal aberrations in the metal-on-metal group was greater than that in the revised group. Specifically, the percentage of structural aberrations was thirty-one-fold higher (p = 0.013). The percentage of aneuploidy gain in the metal-on-metal group was about twice that in the revised group, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.37). The percentage of aneuploidy gain in the revised group was about double that in the control group, although this difference was also not significant (p = 0.41). Translocations were seen only in subjects with a metal-on-metal articulation.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical consequences of the chromosomal changes seen in this study are unknown, and it is unknown if the changes are present in other cells in the body. The results emphasize the need for additional investigations into the effect of chronic exposure to elevated levels of metal ions produced by orthopaedic implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18310701     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  The withdrawn ASR™ THA and hip resurfacing systems: how have our patients fared over 1 to 6 years?

Authors:  Kevin T Hug; Tyler S Watters; Thomas P Vail; Michael P Bolognesi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Metal ions activate vascular endothelial cells and increase lymphocyte chemotaxis and binding.

Authors:  James T Ninomiya; Scott A Kuzma; Timothy J Schnettler; John G Krolikowski; Janine A Struve; Dorothee Weihrauch
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  In-situ Generated Tribomaterial in Metal/Metal Contacts: current understanding and future implications for implants.

Authors:  N Espallargas; A Fischer; A Igual Muñoz; S Mischler; M A Wimmer
Journal:  Biotribology (Oxf)       Date:  2017-05-12

4.  [Complications of metal-on-metal tribological pairing].

Authors:  M Stiehler; F Zobel; F Hannemann; J Schmitt; J Lützner; S Kirschner; K-P Günther; A Hartmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  The biological response to orthopaedic implants for joint replacement: Part I: Metals.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Derek F Amanatullah; Florence Loi; Jukka Pajarinen; Akira Nabeshima; Zhenyu Yao; Moussa Hamadouche; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 6.  Chromium and genomic stability.

Authors:  Sandra S Wise; John Pierce Wise
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  The natural history of inflammatory pseudotumors in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sulaiman A Almousa; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  What Is the Natural History of Asymptomatic Pseudotumors in Metal-on-metal THAs at Mid-term Followup?

Authors:  Sujith Konan; Clive P Duncan; Bassam S Masri; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an analysis of safety and revision rates.

Authors:  S Sehatzadeh; K Kaulback; L Levin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-08-01

Review 10.  Systemic and local toxicity of metal debris released from hip prostheses: A review of experimental approaches.

Authors:  Divya Rani Bijukumar; Abhijith Segu; Júlio C M Souza; XueJun Li; Mark Barba; Louis G Mercuri; Joshua J Jacobs; Mathew Thoppil Mathew
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.