Literature DB >> 9565849

Contamination of embryo transfer catheter and treatment outcome in in vitro fertilization.

A Awonuga1, A Nabi, J Govindbhai, H Birch, B Stewart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The effect of embryo transfer (ET) catheter contamination with mucus and/or blood on treatment outcome in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program was evaluated.
METHODS: One thousand four ET procedures in 877 patients having conventional IVF in the long (1189 cycle) and short (15 cycles) protocol were analyzed to determine the impact of catheter contamination on the incidence of retained embryos and the clinical pregnancy rate.
RESULTS: Catheter contamination with mucus and/or blood is a feature of difficult ET. Embryos were significantly more likely to be retained when the transfer catheter was contaminated with mucus (17.8 versus 3.3%) or blood (12 versus 3.3%). When the catheter was contaminated and an embryo(s) was retained and immediately retransferred, the pregnancy rate was not compromised. The pregnancy rate was significantly reduced when the ET catheter was contaminated with blood (15.5 versus 27.1%; P = 0.002), but no embryo was retained in the catheter set.
CONCLUSIONS: Catheter contamination compromises the treatment outcome in IVF only when there is no associated retained embryo(s). As increased vigilance in searching for extruded embryos may not be practical, we suggest that cervical mucus should be routinely aspirated and ET performed as atraumatically as possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9565849      PMCID: PMC3454937          DOI: 10.1023/a:1023000402789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  10 in total

1.  Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: does this affect in-vitro fertilization treatment outcome?

Authors:  A Nabi; A Awonuga; H Birch; S Barlow; B Stewart
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Incidence of microbial growth from the tip of the embryo transfer catheter after embryo transfer in relation to clinical pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.

Authors:  P E Egbase; M al-Sharhan; S al-Othman; M al-Mutawa; E E Udo; J G Grudzinskas
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Performance of different embryo transfer catheters in a human in vitro fertilization program.

Authors:  A Wisanto; R Janssens; J Deschacht; M Camus; P Devroey; A C Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Residual embryos in failed embryo transfer.

Authors:  A N Poindexter; D J Thompson; W E Gibbons; W E Findley; M G Dodson; R L Young
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Human embryo transfer technique.

Authors:  I Craft; F McLeod; K Edmonds
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-11-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Embryo transfer technique as a cause of ectopic pregnancy in in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  A Nazari; H A Askari; J H Check; A O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: effect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program.

Authors:  D S Visser; F L Fourie; H F Kruger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Successes and failures in human in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  A Lopata
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-12-25       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Establishment of pregnancy related to embryo transfer techniques after in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  K Diedrich; H van der Ven; S al-Hasani; D Krebs
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Dummy embryo transfer using methylene blue dye.

Authors:  R T Mansour; M A Aboulghar; G I Serour; Y M Amin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.918

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Amol Borkar; Amit Shah; Anil Gudi; Roy Homburg
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2020-11-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.