Literature DB >> 2744116

Sensorimotor characteristics of speech motor sequences.

V L Gracco1, J H Abbs.   

Abstract

The present experiment focused on the characteristics of sequential speech movements. Subjects generated two successive lip and jaw closing movements associated with the two 'p's' in 'sapapple'. By selectively manipulating the lower lip perturbation it was possible to discern the role of somatic sensory interactions with the presumed sequential movement programming. Lower lip perturbation duration was manipulated to yield two different load conditions. In the Load On (LN) condition, the perturbation remained on for both closing movements. In the Load On/Off (LNF) condition, the perturbation was removed at variable times prior to the second closing movement. Analyses focused on comparing the EMG and resulting kinematic changes for the second "p" closure across the two load conditions relative to the normal control (no load) condition. The second "p" closure was differentially affected by the load conditions resulting in changes in the upper and lower lip compensations. Upper lip changes reflected consistent load duration differences; however, the magnitude of the lower lip EMG and kinematic adjustments did not mirror those of the upper lip. In contrast to the differential upper lip/lower lip changes observed for the magnitude adjustments, timing adjustments were similar for both upper lip and lower lip suggesting a separation between the specification of magnitude and timing of speech movements. Differential load effects were also observed for the timing of the second closing movements. For the LN condition, the onset of muscle activity and subsequent movement occurred earlier (re: control); for the LNF condition, load removal delayed the onset of muscle activity and the subsequent movement (re: control). Further, the opening movement preceding the second closing movement was modified for both load conditions suggesting that all movements in the sequence, not just closing movements, can be modified. The present results suggest that the programming of speech movement sequences is a dynamic process involving scaling and timing of motor commands relying on various degrees of sensory interaction. The apparent separation in the magnitude and timing specification of the movement sequences suggests the parallel influences of different neural systems. The consequence of this control scheme is that specification of movement parameters for sequential motor acts is a flexible real-time sensorimotor process interacting with less-flexible well-established central motor relations. Further, motor program for speech may reflect certain generalized movement actions (e.g., oral opening, oral closing) rather than individual words, syllables, or other linguistic categories programmed on a movement-to-movement basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2744116     DOI: 10.1007/bf00249910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Speech disturbances caused by tumours of the supplementary motor area.

Authors:  C Arseni; M I Botez
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1961       Impact factor: 6.392

2.  Motor programming within a sequence of responses.

Authors:  S T Klapp; E Patrick Wyatt
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  On the initiation of the swing phase of locomotion in chronic spinal cats.

Authors:  S Grillner; S Rossignol
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-05-12       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Motor strategies involved in the performance of sequential movements.

Authors:  R Benecke; J C Rothwell; B L Day; J P Dick; C D Marsden
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Spoonerisms: the structure of errors in the serial order of speech.

Authors:  D G MacKay
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Control of complex motor gestures: orofacial muscle responses to load perturbations of lip during speech.

Authors:  J H Abbs; V L Gracco
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Central patterning of speech movements.

Authors:  V L Gracco; J H Abbs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Different cortical areas in man in organization of voluntary movements in extrapersonal space.

Authors:  P E Roland; E Skinhøj; N A Lassen; B Larsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Speech arrest in a dextral with a right mesial frontal astrocytoma.

Authors:  L R Caplan; N T Zervas
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1978-04
View more
  5 in total

1.  Focal manipulations of formant trajectories reveal a role of auditory feedback in the online control of both within-syllable and between-syllable speech timing.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Charles R Larson; Jay J Bauer; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An investigation of the relation between sibilant production and somatosensory and auditory acuity.

Authors:  Satrajit S Ghosh; Melanie L Matthies; Edwin Maas; Alexandra Hanson; Mark Tiede; Lucie Ménard; Frank H Guenther; Harlan Lane; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.

Authors:  Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Timing variability of sensorimotor integration during vocalization in individuals who stutter.

Authors:  Anastasia G Sares; Mickael L D Deroche; Douglas M Shiller; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.