Nicholas S Costantino1, Benjamin Freeman2, Craig D Shriver2, Rachel E Ellsworth3. 1. Chan Soon-Shiong Institute of Molecular Medicine at Windber, Windber, Penn. 2. Clinical Breast Care Project, Murtha Cancer Center, Bethesda, Md. 3. Clinical Breast Care Project, Murtha Cancer Center, Windber, Penn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Breast cancer mortality rates are higher for African American women (AAW) than for any other ethnic group in the United States. Recent reports suggest that outcome disparities between AAW and European American women (EAW) are present in the ER+HER2- subtype. To improve our understanding, pathological characteristics, mortality and molecular profiles from women treated within an equal-access health care system were evaluated. PROCEDURES: All AAW (n=90) and EAW (n=308) with ER+HER2- tumors were identified. Gene expression profiles were generated from primary breast tumors from 57 AAW and 181 EAW. Pathological characteristics, survival and gene expression analysis were evaluated using chi-square analysis, log-rank tests and ANOVA. RESULTS: Tumors from AAW were significantly more likely to be PR-, Ki67+ and of higher grade. Tumor stage, size and lymph node status did not differ significantly, nor did mortality rates (P=.879). At the molecular level, genes PSPHL and CRYBB2P1 were expressed at significantly higher levels in tumor tissues as well as normal stroma and blood from AAW. Polymorphisms controlling expression of each gene were identified with minor allele frequencies differing significantly between populations but not between cases and controls within each population. CONCLUSIONS: Survival disparities were not detected in patients with ER+HER2- tumors treated within an equal-access health care system and molecular differences in tumors were not causal. Thus, outcome disparities in AAW with ER+HER2- tumors are largely attributable to socioeconomic factors affecting access to screening and treatment, rather than reflecting underlying biological differences.
PURPOSE:Breast cancer mortality rates are higher for African American women (AAW) than for any other ethnic group in the United States. Recent reports suggest that outcome disparities between AAW and European American women (EAW) are present in the ER+HER2- subtype. To improve our understanding, pathological characteristics, mortality and molecular profiles from women treated within an equal-access health care system were evaluated. PROCEDURES: All AAW (n=90) and EAW (n=308) with ER+HER2- tumors were identified. Gene expression profiles were generated from primary breast tumors from 57 AAW and 181 EAW. Pathological characteristics, survival and gene expression analysis were evaluated using chi-square analysis, log-rank tests and ANOVA. RESULTS:Tumors from AAW were significantly more likely to be PR-, Ki67+ and of higher grade. Tumor stage, size and lymph node status did not differ significantly, nor did mortality rates (P=.879). At the molecular level, genes PSPHL and CRYBB2P1 were expressed at significantly higher levels in tumor tissues as well as normal stroma and blood from AAW. Polymorphisms controlling expression of each gene were identified with minor allele frequencies differing significantly between populations but not between cases and controls within each population. CONCLUSIONS: Survival disparities were not detected in patients with ER+HER2- tumors treated within an equal-access health care system and molecular differences in tumors were not causal. Thus, outcome disparities in AAW with ER+HER2- tumors are largely attributable to socioeconomic factors affecting access to screening and treatment, rather than reflecting underlying biological differences.
Entities:
Keywords:
African American; Breast Cancer; Disparities; Luminal A
Authors: Lori A Field; Brad Love; Brenda Deyarmin; Jeffrey A Hooke; Craig D Shriver; Rachel E Ellsworth Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jay E Allard; Gadisetti V R Chandramouli; Katherine Stagliano; Brian L Hood; Tracy Litzi; Yutaka Shoji; Jeff Boyd; Andrew Berchuck; Thomas P Conrads; G Larry Maxwell; John I Risinger Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Jonathan C Schisler; Peter C Charles; Joel S Parker; Eleanor G Hilliard; Sabeen Mapara; Dane Meredith; Robert E Lineberger; Samuel S Wu; Brian D Alder; George A Stouffer; Cam Patterson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-12-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Huiyan Ma; Yani Lu; Kathleen E Malone; Polly A Marchbanks; Dennis M Deapen; Robert Spirtas; Ronald T Burkman; Brian L Strom; Jill A McDonald; Suzanne G Folger; Michael S Simon; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Michael F Press; Leslie Bernstein Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2013-05-04 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: A Goldhirsch; E P Winer; A S Coates; R D Gelber; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-08-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Maya A Barrow; Megan E Martin; Alisha Coffey; Portia L Andrews; Gieira S Jones; Denise K Reaves; Joel S Parker; Melissa A Troester; Jodie M Fleming Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Lindsay J Collin; Renjian Jiang; Kevin C Ward; Keerthi Gogineni; Preeti D Subhedar; Mark E Sherman; Mia M Gaudet; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Olivia D'Angelo; Sheryl Gabram-Mendola; Ritu Aneja; Anne H Gaglioti; Lauren E McCullough Journal: JNCI Cancer Spectr Date: 2019-08-07