Literature DB >> 27439396

Remote monitoring of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a Southeast Asian, single-centre pilot study.

Paul Chun Yih Lim1, Audry Shan Yin Lee1, Kelvin Chi Ming Chua1, Eric Tien Siang Lim1, Daniel Thuan Tee Chong1, Boon Yew Tan1, Kah Leng Ho1, Wee Siong Teo1, Chi Keong Ching1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has been shown to improve patient safety and reduce in-office visits. We report our experience with remote monitoring via the Medtronic CareLink(®) network.
METHODS: Patients were followed up for six months with scheduled monthly remote monitoring transmissions in addition to routine in-office checks. The efficacy of remote monitoring was evaluated by recording compliance to transmissions, number of device alerts requiring intervention and time from transmission to review. Questionnaires were administered to evaluate the experiences of patients, physicians and medical technicians.
RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were enrolled; 16 (28.1%) had permanent pacemakers, 34 (59.6%) had implantable cardioverter defibrillators and 7 (12.3%) had cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillators. Overall, of 334 remote transmissions scheduled, 73.7% were on time, 14.5% were overdue and 11.8% were missed. 84.6% of wireless transmissions were on time, compared to 53.8% of non-wireless transmissions. Among all transmissions, 4.4% contained alerts for which physicians were informed and only 1.8% required intervention. 98.6% of remote transmissions were reviewed by the second working day. 73.2% of patients preferred remote monitoring. Physicians agreed that remote transmissions provided information equivalent to in-office checks 97.1% of the time. 77.8% of medical technicians felt that remote monitoring would help the hospital improve patient management. No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring of CIED is safe and feasible. It has possible benefits to patient safety through earlier detection of arrhythmias or device malfunction, permitting earlier intervention. Wireless remote monitoring, in particular, may improve compliance to device monitoring. Patients may prefer remote monitoring due to possible improvements in quality of life. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac implantable electronic devices; remote monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27439396      PMCID: PMC4958713          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  34 in total

1.  ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities.

Authors:  Andrew E Epstein; John P Dimarco; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Roger A Freedman; Leonard S Gettes; A Marc Gillinov; Gabriel Gregoratos; Stephen C Hammill; David L Hayes; Mark A Hlatky; L Kristin Newby; Richard L Page; Mark H Schoenfeld; Michael J Silka; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Michael O Sweeney
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices in the Asia-Pacific.

Authors:  Chu-Pak Lau; Shu Zhang
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial.

Authors:  Niraj Varma; Andrew E Epstein; Anand Irimpen; Robert Schweikert; Charles Love
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Home monitoring system improves the detection of ventricular arrhythmia and inappropriate shock.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Wei Hua; Li-Gang Ding; Jing Wang; Ke-Ping Chen; Shu Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Remote monitoring of patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICD): a cute gimmick or an essential tool for clinical excellence?

Authors:  Nahum A Freedberg; Alexander Feldman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-05-02

6.  Management of alert messages in the remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and pacemakers: an Italian single-region study.

Authors:  Antonio Franco Folino; Francesco Chiusso; Gabriele Zanotto; Diego Vaccari; Gianni Gasparini; Antonella Megna; Elena Marras; Roberto Mantovan; Alessandro Vaglio; Gabriele Boscolo; Gianluca Biancalana; Loira Leoni; Sabino Iliceto; Gianfranco Buja
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  What evidence do we have to replace in-hospital implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up?

Authors:  P Brugada
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  "Home monitoring" for early detection of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator failure: a single-center prospective observational study.

Authors:  Melanie Hauck; Alexander Bauer; Frederik Voss; Slawomir Weretka; Hugo A Katus; Ruediger Becker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  A randomized study of remote follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: safety and efficacy report of the ECOST trial.

Authors:  Laurence Guédon-Moreau; Dominique Lacroix; Nicolas Sadoul; Jacques Clémenty; Claude Kouakam; Jean-Sylvain Hermida; Etienne Aliot; Michel Boursier; Olivier Bizeau; Salem Kacet
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 10.  Remote monitoring and follow-up of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  Haran Burri; David Senouf
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  5 in total

1.  Changes in the practice of cardiology: therapies at the forefront of science.

Authors:  Joshua Ping-Yun Loh; Kian-Keong Poh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Cloud Follow-Up in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: A Single-Region Study in China.

Authors:  Lin Tong; Shiqiang Xiong; Jun Hou; Jin Li; Shujuan Qin; Yangchun Zhang; Siqi Yang; Lingyao Qi; Xu Chen; Yan Luo; Zhen Zhang; Haoyu Deng; Hanxiong Liu; Lin Cai
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-09

3.  Telemonitoring and Quality of Life in Patients after 12 Months Following a Pacemaker Implant: the Nordland Study, a Randomised Trial.

Authors:  Remedios López-Liria; Antonio López-Villegas; Terje Enebakk; Hilde Thunhaug; Knut Tore Lappegård; Daniel Catalán-Matamoros
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Effectiveness and Safety in Remote Monitoring of Patients with Pacemakers Five Years after an Implant: The Poniente Study.

Authors:  Remedios López-Liria; Antonio López-Villegas; César Leal-Costa; Salvador Peiró; Emilio Robles-Musso; Rafael Bautista-Mesa; Patricia Rocamora-Pérez; Knut Tore Lappegård; Daniel Catalán-Matamoros
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Prospective evaluation of integrated device diagnostics for heart failure management: results of the TRIAGE-HF study.

Authors:  Sean A Virani; Vinod Sharma; Mary McCann; Jodi Koehler; Bernice Tsang; Shelley Zieroth
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2018-06-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.