Literature DB >> 16598602

What evidence do we have to replace in-hospital implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up?

P Brugada1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Due to the increasing number of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), new options for ICD patient follow-up management are required.
METHODS: Patients with ICD indication according to the guidelines received an ICD with Home Monitoring technology. The devices enabled the transmission of the relevant episode, therapy, and system integrity data. Patients were followed for 12 months with routine controls every 3 months. The physician analyzed the Home Monitoring data before the routine follow-up visit (FU) and gave a forecast on the necessity of the pending FU, which was compared with the evaluation after the FU. Based on the derived forecast reliability, a patient management scheme was developed and its impact on patient safety was assessed retrospectively.
RESULTS: A total of 271 patients were enrolled (40 f, mean age 62+/-12 years, mean LVEF 39+/-15%, 65% ischemic heart disease, 20% cardiomyopathy) and followed for 339+/-109 days. Of 908 pairs of Home Monitoring data and FU data evaluation, 129 there were false negative results for 92 patients. Safety concerns from false negative forecasts can be minimized with a patient management scheme containing the following elements: 1) never skip the first routine FU; 2) never skip a routine FU for a patient having already shown pacing threshold problems; 3) perform FU following hospitalizations; 4) perform FU following episode detection by the ICD; and 5) perform a routine FU if the patient reports symptoms. The retrospective analysis showed, that if the patients had been managed using this scheme, 503 of 1079 routine FU could have been skipped with only one safety concern, a three month delay in the detection of silent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Home Monitoring in ICD therapy over 12 months is feasible. The data transmitted relevantly contribute to a remarkable reduction of follow-up burden and enable the individualization of routine follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16598602     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-006-1302-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  18 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up in Canada: a consensus statement of the Canadian Working Group on Cardiac Pacing.

Authors:  Anne M Gillis; François Philippon; Margaret R Cassidy; Narendra Singh; Paul Dorian; Barry A Love; Charles R Kerr
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Home Monitoring in an ICD patient with incessant ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  R Koos; A M Sinha; C Stellbrink
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-07

4.  Recurrence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator after the first device therapy: implications for antiarrhythmic therapy and driving restrictions. CARE Group.

Authors:  N A Freedberg; J N Hill; R I Fogel; E N Prystowsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Gust H Bardy; Kerry L Lee; Daniel B Mark; Jeanne E Poole; Douglas L Packer; Robin Boineau; Michael Domanski; Charles Troutman; Jill Anderson; George Johnson; Steven E McNulty; Nancy Clapp-Channing; Linda D Davidson-Ray; Elizabeth S Fraulo; Daniel P Fishbein; Richard M Luceri; John H Ip
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  What is the "optimal" follow-up schedule for ICD patients?

Authors:  Julia C Senges-Becker; Martina Klostermann; Ruediger Becker; Alexander Bauer; Karl E Siegler; Hugo A Katus; Wolfgang Schoels
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  The automatic implantable defibrillator.

Authors:  M Mirowski; M M Mower; P R Reid
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Patient alert in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: toy or tool?

Authors:  Ruediger Becker; Jutta Ruf-Richter; Julia C Senges-Becker; Alexander Bauer; Slawomir Weretka; Frederik Voss; Hugo A Katus; Wolfgang Schoels
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  A systematic review of telemonitoring for the management of heart failure.

Authors:  Amala A Louis; Tracy Turner; Marcia Gretton; Angela Baksh; John G F Cleland
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 15.534

10.  Twiddler's syndrome detected by home monitoring device.

Authors:  Marcoen F Scholten; Andrew S Thornton; Dominic A Theuns; Jan Res; Luc J Jordaens
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  21 in total

1.  ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

Authors:  Sergio Dubner; Angelo Auricchio; Jonathan S Steinberg; Panos Vardas; Peter Stone; Josep Brugada; Ryszard Piotrowicz; David L Hayes; Paulus Kirchhof; Günter Breithardt; Wojciech Zareba; Claudio Schuger; Mehmet K Aktas; Michal Chudzik; Suneet Mittal; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Workload, time and costs of the informal cares in patients with tele-monitoring of pacemakers: the PONIENTE study.

Authors:  Antonio López-Villegas; Daniel Catalán-Matamoros; Emilio Robles-Musso; Salvador Peiró
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Remote monitoring of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a Southeast Asian, single-centre pilot study.

Authors:  Paul Chun Yih Lim; Audry Shan Yin Lee; Kelvin Chi Ming Chua; Eric Tien Siang Lim; Daniel Thuan Tee Chong; Boon Yew Tan; Kah Leng Ho; Wee Siong Teo; Chi Keong Ching
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Remote monitoring in implantable defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  D A M J Theuns; L S Jordaens
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  The year in Clinical Research in Cardiology.

Authors:  Michael Böhm; Hugo Katus
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Advances in remote monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems.

Authors:  Werner Jung; Andreas Rillig; Ralf Birkemeyer; Tomislav Miljak; Udo Meyerfeldt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Internet-based device-assisted remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  G Pron; L Ieraci; K Kaulback
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2012-01-01

8.  Remote care: bidding our ICD patients a fond farewell?

Authors:  T A Simmers
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Patient satisfaction and suggestions for improvement of remote ICD monitoring.

Authors:  Helen Høgh Petersen; Mie Christa Jensen Larsen; Olav Wendelboe Nielsen; Finn Kensing; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Atrial tachycardias following circumferential pulmonary vein ablation: observations during catheter ablation.

Authors:  Marc Horlitz; Philipp Schley; Dong-In Shin; Beatrice Tonnellier; Hartmut Gülker
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.