Literature DB >> 29273864

[Testing and approach when non-organic visual loss is suspected].

Anna Sophie Mursch-Edlmayr1, D Mojon2, M Bolz3.   

Abstract

Approximately 5% of the patients in the ophthalmological practice suffer from non-organic vision loss. In children non-organic vision loss has been observed from the age of 6 years. In order to be able to make a rapid diagnosis knowledge of the relevant clinical tests is decisive. If a patient shows signs of non-organic visual loss, diagnostic externalization of the visual function is crucial. Depending on the symptoms there are various tests, which can be used to differentiate between organic and non-organic disorders. For therapeutic and economic reasons an early diagnosis of a non-organic visual loss is crucial. Ophthalmologists need to differentiate between malingering and augmentation, where the patient is aware of the fraud and tries to gain personal benefit from it, and somatoform disorders. In the latter, a more sensitive approach is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aggravation; Loss of visual acuity; Malingering; Simulation testing; Somatoform disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29273864     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-017-0628-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  23 in total

1.  Visual conversion reaction in children. I. Diagnosis.

Authors:  R T Rada; G G Meyer; A E Krill
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  1969 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.386

2.  Assessment of malingerers' visual acuity by Lotmar's visometer test.

Authors:  F M Grignolo; F Moscone; A Boles-Carenini
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-09

Review 3.  [Examination strategies in simulation and functional vision disorders].

Authors:  S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 0.700

Review 4.  Functional visual loss: I. A true psychiatric disorder?

Authors:  R G Kathol; T A Cox; J J Corbett; H S Thompson; J Clancy
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  [Functional reduction of vision symptomatic of a conversion reaction in paediatric population].

Authors:  A Langmann; S Lindner; N Kriechbaum
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 0.700

6.  Saccade testing to distinguish between non-organic and organic visual-field restriction.

Authors:  M S Zinkernagel; N Pellanda; A Kunz; D S Mojon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  The California syndrome. Functional visual complaints with potential economic impact.

Authors:  J L Keltner; W N May; C A Johnson; R B Post
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Hysterical symptoms in ophthalmology.

Authors:  M Weller; P Wiedemann
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Perimetric findings in functional disorders using automated techniques.

Authors:  T J Smith; R S Baker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Visual field in hysteria-reliability of visual field by Goldmann perimetry.

Authors:  H Ohkubo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.