Literature DB >> 27438106

Differences in Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation in Women and Men: Two-Year Results From the ORBIT-AF Registry.

Jonathan P Piccini1, DaJuanicia N Simon2, Benjamin A Steinberg1, Laine Thomas2, Larry A Allen3, Gregg C Fonarow4, Bernard Gersh5, Elaine Hylek6, Peter R Kowey7, James A Reiffel8, Gerald V Naccarelli9, Paul S Chan10, John A Spertus10, Eric D Peterson1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Despite the frequency of atrial fibrillation (AF) in clinical practice, relatively little is known about sex differences in symptoms and quality of life and how they may affect treatment and outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether symptoms, quality of life, treatment, and outcomes differ between women and men with AF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational cohort study included 10 135 patients with AF. The Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation is a prospective, nationwide, multicenter outpatient registry of patients with incident and prevalent AF enrolled at 176 sites between June 2010 and August 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Symptoms, quality of life as measured by Atrial Fibrillation Effects on Quality of Life scores, AF treatment, cardiovascular outcomes, stroke or non-central nervous system embolism, and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Overall, 4293 of the cohort (42%) were female. Compared with men, women were older (77 years; interquartile range [IQR], 69-83, vs 73 years; IQR, 65-80; P < .001) and had higher median CHA2DS2-VASc scores (5; IQR, 4-6, vs 3; IQR, 2-5; P < .001), but less sleep apnea (578 [13.5%] vs 1264 [21.6%]; P < .001). Only 32.1% of women (n = 1378) were asymptomatic (European Heart Rhythm Association class I) compared with 42.5% of men (n = 2483) in unadjusted analyses (P < .001). Women had lower (more severe) unadjusted baseline overall Atrial Fibrillation Effects on Quality of Life scores (n = 2007; 80; IQR, 62-92 vs 83; IQR, 69-94; P < .001). Women had similar rates of anticoagulation and similar time in therapeutic range. In follow-up, women experienced lower risk-adjusted all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.49-0.67) and cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44-0.72); however, they had a higher risk for stroke or non-central nervous system embolism (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.05-1.84; P = .02) compared with men. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Women with AF have more symptoms and worse quality of life. Despite higher risk, women have lower risk-adjusted all-cause and cardiovascular death compared with men, but higher stroke rates. Future studies should focus on how treatment and interventions specifically affect AF-related quality of life and cardiovascular outcomes in women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01165710.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27438106     DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  50 in total

Review 1.  Stroke in women - from evidence to inequalities.

Authors:  Charlotte Cordonnier; Nikola Sprigg; Else Charlotte Sandset; Aleksandra Pavlovic; Katharina S Sunnerhagen; Valeria Caso; Hanne Christensen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Assessment of Sex Differences in the Initial Symptom Burden, Applied Treatment Strategy, and Quality of Life in Japanese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Ikemura; Shun Kohsaka; Takehiro Kimura; Ikuko Ueda; Yoshinori Katsumata; Takahiko Nishiyama; Yoshiyasu Aizawa; Kojiro Tanimoto; Yukihiko Momiyama; Makoto Akaishi; Hideo Mitamura; Keiichi Fukuda; John A Spertus; Seiji Takatsuki
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-03-01

3.  Sex-based differences in outcomes, 30-day readmissions, and costs following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the United States Nationwide Readmissions Database 2010-14.

Authors:  Jim W Cheung; Edward P Cheng; Xian Wu; Ilhwan Yeo; Paul J Christos; Hooman Kamel; Steven M Markowitz; Christopher F Liu; George Thomas; James E Ip; Bruce B Lerman; Luke K Kim
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Lead-I ECG for detecting atrial fibrillation in patients with an irregular pulse using single time point testing: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Rui Duarte; Angela Stainthorpe; Janette Greenhalgh; Marty Richardson; Sarah Nevitt; James Mahon; Eleanor Kotas; Angela Boland; Howard Thom; Tom Marshall; Mark Hall; Yemisi Takwoingi
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 5.  Gender Differences in Arrhythmias: Focused on Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Xiao-Ting Tian; Ying-Jia Xu; Yi-Qing Yang
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Symptoms In Atrial Fibrillation: A Contemporary Review And Future Directions.

Authors:  Steven T Heidt; Anna Kratz; Kayvan Najarian; Afton L Hassett; Hakan Oral; Richard Gonzalez; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Daniel Clauw; Hamid Ghanbari
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-06-30

7.  Atrial fibrillation symptom profiles associated with healthcare utilization: A latent class regression analysis.

Authors:  Megan M Streur; Sarah J Ratcliffe; David J Callans; M Benjamin Shoemaker; Barbara J Riegel
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Factors associated with low health-related quality of life among younger and older Thai patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Varalak Srinonprasert; Kasem Ratanasumawong; Tomon Thongsri; Somchai Dutsadeevettakul; Pongpun Jittham; Weerapan Wiwatworapan; Rungroj Krittayaphong
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Atrial fibrillation in patients with systolic heart failure: pathophysiology mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Ioanna Koniari; Eleni Artopoulou; Dimitrios Velissaris; Nicholas Kounis; Grigorios Tsigkas
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 10.  Antiarrhythmic mechanisms of beta blocker therapy.

Authors:  Eleonora Grandi; Crystal M Ripplinger
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 7.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.