Importance: The clinical characteristics and outcomes of women and men with atrial fibrillation (AF) are reported to be different. However, whether sex-related differences extend to patients' symptom burden and perceived quality of life (QOL) or the management pattern of AF has been rarely studied, particularly in Asian countries. Objective: To assess the differences in symptoms, treatment, and QOL between Japanese female and male patients with AF. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study using data from the multicenter outpatient registry Keio Interhospital Cardiovascular Studies-Atrial Fibrillation (KiCS-AF), which collects information regarding health status and the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed or referred AF. One-year follow-up data were available for 1534 patients at 11 referral centers in the Tokyo, Japan, area who were enrolled between September 2012 and December 2015. All data available up to the 1-year follow-up examination through July 31, 2017, were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex, symptoms, AF treatment, and QOL as determined by Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) questionnaires at their initial visit and 1 year later. Results: Of 1534 patients, 1076 (70.1%) were men. Compared with men, women were more likely to be older (median age, 73 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 65-78 years] vs 65 years [IQR, 57-73 years], P < .001) and have higher median brain-type natriuretic peptide levels (102.8 pg/mL [IQR, 47.3-235.5 pg/mL] vs 74.1 pg/mL [IQR, 28.5-150.5 pg/mL], P < .001). Women also had lower median AFEQT overall summary scores than men (75 [IQR, 61-85] vs 80 [IQR, 69-90]; P < .001) but similar treatment satisfaction at baseline. During follow-up, women were less likely to be treated with a rhythm control strategy (48.1% [n = 214] vs 58.0% [n = 621], P < .001), including catheter ablation of AF (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.62-0.95]; P = .02). At 1-year follow-up, women and men had improved QOL scores, regardless of their baseline characteristics (eg, age or brain-type natriuretic peptide levels) or treatment strategies, yet the sex gap persisted and grew (adjusted change in AFEQT overall summary score during 12 months, 5.89 [95% CI, 2.24-9.54] in women vs 8.94 [95% CI, 5.59-12.30] in men; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In contemporary Japanese clinical practice among unselected patients with AF, women were initially seen with greater QOL impairment, and the sex gap grew 1 year after presentation. The present study underscores the need for focused efforts to better understand and close this observed sex gap over the initial year of treatment for patients with AF.
Importance: The clinical characteristics and outcomes of women and men with atrial fibrillation (AF) are reported to be different. However, whether sex-related differences extend to patients' symptom burden and perceived quality of life (QOL) or the management pattern of AF has been rarely studied, particularly in Asian countries. Objective: To assess the differences in symptoms, treatment, and QOL between Japanese female and male patients with AF. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study using data from the multicenter outpatient registry Keio Interhospital Cardiovascular Studies-Atrial Fibrillation (KiCS-AF), which collects information regarding health status and the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed or referred AF. One-year follow-up data were available for 1534 patients at 11 referral centers in the Tokyo, Japan, area who were enrolled between September 2012 and December 2015. All data available up to the 1-year follow-up examination through July 31, 2017, were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex, symptoms, AF treatment, and QOL as determined by Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) questionnaires at their initial visit and 1 year later. Results: Of 1534 patients, 1076 (70.1%) were men. Compared with men, women were more likely to be older (median age, 73 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 65-78 years] vs 65 years [IQR, 57-73 years], P < .001) and have higher median brain-type natriuretic peptide levels (102.8 pg/mL [IQR, 47.3-235.5 pg/mL] vs 74.1 pg/mL [IQR, 28.5-150.5 pg/mL], P < .001). Women also had lower median AFEQT overall summary scores than men (75 [IQR, 61-85] vs 80 [IQR, 69-90]; P < .001) but similar treatment satisfaction at baseline. During follow-up, women were less likely to be treated with a rhythm control strategy (48.1% [n = 214] vs 58.0% [n = 621], P < .001), including catheter ablation of AF (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.62-0.95]; P = .02). At 1-year follow-up, women and men had improved QOL scores, regardless of their baseline characteristics (eg, age or brain-type natriuretic peptide levels) or treatment strategies, yet the sex gap persisted and grew (adjusted change in AFEQT overall summary score during 12 months, 5.89 [95% CI, 2.24-9.54] in women vs 8.94 [95% CI, 5.59-12.30] in men; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In contemporary Japanese clinical practice among unselected patients with AF, women were initially seen with greater QOL impairment, and the sex gap grew 1 year after presentation. The present study underscores the need for focused efforts to better understand and close this observed sex gap over the initial year of treatment for patients with AF.
Authors: Jonathan P Piccini; DaJuanicia N Simon; Benjamin A Steinberg; Laine Thomas; Larry A Allen; Gregg C Fonarow; Bernard Gersh; Elaine Hylek; Peter R Kowey; James A Reiffel; Gerald V Naccarelli; Paul S Chan; John A Spertus; Eric D Peterson Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Lephuong Ong; Jane Irvine; Robert Nolan; Robert Cribbie; Louise Harris; David Newman; Iqwal Mangat; Paul Dorian Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Stephen S Gottlieb; Meenakshi Khatta; Erika Friedmann; Lynn Einbinder; Scott Katzen; Brian Baker; Joanne Marshall; Stacey Minshall; Shawn Robinson; Michael L Fisher; Matthew Potenza; Brianne Sigler; Carissa Baldwin; Sue Ann Thomas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-05-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Steffen Blum; Christoph Muff; Stefanie Aeschbacher; Peter Ammann; Paul Erne; Giorgio Moschovitis; Marcello Di Valentino; Dipen Shah; Jürg Schläpfer; Andreas Fischer; Tamara Merkel; Michael Kühne; Christian Sticherling; Stefan Osswald; David Conen Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Connor A Emdin; Christopher X Wong; Allan J Hsiao; Douglas G Altman; Sanne Ae Peters; Mark Woodward; Ayodele A Odutayo Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-01-19
Authors: Raisa L Silva; Emily N Guhl; Andrew D Althouse; Brandon Herbert; Michael Sharbaugh; Utibe R Essien; Leslie R M Hausmann; Jared W Magnani Journal: Am J Prev Cardiol Date: 2021-09-03
Authors: Victoria Jansson; Lennart Bergfeldt; Jonas Schwieler; Göran Kennebäck; Aigars Rubulis; Steen M Jensen; Pekka Raatikainen; Elena Sciaraffia; Carina Blomström-Lundqvist Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2021-05-11
Authors: Luc J H J Theunissen; Henricus-Paul Cremers; Dennis van Veghel; Pepijn H van der Voort; Peter E Polak; Sylvie F A M S de Jong; Geert Smits; Jos Dijkmans; Hareld M C Kemps; Lukas R C Dekker; Jeroen A A van de Pol Journal: J Arrhythm Date: 2022-01-10
Authors: Shinwan Kany; Johannes Brachmann; Thorsten Lewalter; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Dietrich Andresen; Stephan Willems; Ellen Hoffmann; Lars Eckardt; Dierk Thomas; Matthias Hochadel; Jochen Senges; Andreas Metzner; Andreas Rillig Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 5.460