Megan M Streur1, Sarah J Ratcliffe2, David J Callans3, M Benjamin Shoemaker4, Barbara J Riegel5. 1. School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3. Cardiology Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Presbyterian Medical Center of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 5. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Symptoms drive healthcare use among adults with atrial fibrillation, but limited data are available regarding which symptoms are most problematic and which patients are most at-risk. The purpose of this study was to: (1) identify clusters of patients with similar symptom profiles, (2) characterize the individuals within each cluster, and (3) determine whether specific symptom profiles are associated with healthcare utilization. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional secondary data analysis of 1,501 adults from the Vanderbilt Atrial Fibrillation Registry. Participants were recruited from Vanderbilt cardiology clinics, emergency department, and in-patient services. Subjects included in our analysis had clinically verified atrial fibrillation and a completed symptom survey. Symptom and healthcare utilization data were collected with the University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale. Latent class regression analysis was used to identify symptom clusters, with clinical and demographic variables included as covariates. We used Poisson regression to examine the association between latent class membership and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Participants were predominantly male (67%) with a mean age of 58.4 years (±11.9). Four latent classes were evident, including an Asymptomatic cluster (N = 487, 38%), Highly Symptomatic cluster (N = 142, 11%), With Activity cluster (N = 326, 25%), and Mild Diffuse cluster (N = 336, 26%). Highly Symptomatic membership was associated with the greatest rate of emergency department visits and hospitalizations (incident rate ratio 2.4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful atrial fibrillation symptom profiles were identified that were associated with increased rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations.
BACKGROUND: Symptoms drive healthcare use among adults with atrial fibrillation, but limited data are available regarding which symptoms are most problematic and which patients are most at-risk. The purpose of this study was to: (1) identify clusters of patients with similar symptom profiles, (2) characterize the individuals within each cluster, and (3) determine whether specific symptom profiles are associated with healthcare utilization. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional secondary data analysis of 1,501 adults from the Vanderbilt Atrial Fibrillation Registry. Participants were recruited from Vanderbilt cardiology clinics, emergency department, and in-patient services. Subjects included in our analysis had clinically verified atrial fibrillation and a completed symptom survey. Symptom and healthcare utilization data were collected with the University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale. Latent class regression analysis was used to identify symptom clusters, with clinical and demographic variables included as covariates. We used Poisson regression to examine the association between latent class membership and healthcare utilization. RESULTS:Participants were predominantly male (67%) with a mean age of 58.4 years (±11.9). Four latent classes were evident, including an Asymptomatic cluster (N = 487, 38%), Highly Symptomatic cluster (N = 142, 11%), With Activity cluster (N = 326, 25%), and Mild Diffuse cluster (N = 336, 26%). Highly Symptomatic membership was associated with the greatest rate of emergency department visits and hospitalizations (incident rate ratio 2.4, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful atrial fibrillation symptom profiles were identified that were associated with increased rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Andrea M Barsevick; Kyra Whitmer; Lillian M Nail; Susan L Beck; William N Dudley Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Paul Dorian; Caroline Burk; Christopher M Mullin; Rosemary Bubien; Donna Godejohn; Matthew R Reynolds; Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy; Alan P Wimmer; Anil Bhandari; John Spertus Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: José Silva-Cardoso; Oleg J Zharinov; Piotr Ponikowski; Lisa Naditch-Brûlé; Thorsten Lewalter; Sandrine Brette; P Gabriel Steg Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Dawood Darbar; Prince J Kannankeril; Brian S Donahue; Gayle Kucera; Tanya Stubblefield; Jonathan L Haines; Alfred L George; Dan M Roden Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Benita A Bamgbade; Saket R Sanghai; David D McManus; Darleen Lessard; Molly E Waring; Sarah Forrester; Isabelle Pierre-Louis; Jane S Saczynski Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 3.250