Literature DB >> 27436880

Higher Visit-to-Visit Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Variability Is Associated With Lower Cognitive Performance, Lower Cerebral Blood Flow, and Greater White Matter Hyperintensity Load in Older Subjects.

Roelof A J Smit1, Stella Trompet1, Behnam Sabayan1, Saskia le Cessie1, Jeroen van der Grond1, Mark A van Buchem1, Anton J M de Craen1, J Wouter Jukema1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, it was shown that intraindividual variation in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) predicts both cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. We aimed to examine whether this extends to cognitive function and examined possible pathways using a magnetic resonance imaging substudy.
METHODS: We investigated the association between LDL-C variability and 4 cognitive domains at month 30 in 4428 participants of PROSPER (PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk). Additionally, we assessed the association of LDL-C variability with neuroimaging outcomes in a subset of 535 participants. LDL-C variability was defined as the intraindividual standard deviation over 4 postbaseline LDL-C measurements, and all analyses were adjusted for mean LDL-C levels and cardiovascular risk factors.
RESULTS: Higher LDL-C variability was associated with lower cognitive function in both the placebo and pravastatin treatment arms. Associations were present for selective attention (P=0.017 and P=0.11, respectively), processing speed (P=0.20 and P=0.029), and memory (immediate recall, P=0.002 and P=0.006; delayed recall, P=0.001 and P≤0.001). Furthermore, higher LDL-C variability was associated with lower cerebral blood flow in both trial arms (P=0.031 and P=0.050) and with greater white matter hyperintensity load in the pravastatin arm (P=0.046). No evidence was found for interaction between LDL-C variability and pravastatin treatment for both cognitive and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that higher visit-to-visit variability in LDL-C, independently of mean LDL-C levels and statin treatment, is associated with lower cognitive performance, lower cerebral blood flow, and greater white matter hyperintensity load.
© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atherosclerosis; lipoproteins; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27436880     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  22 in total

1.  Cholesterol Variability and Cranial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Rizwan Kalani; Traci M Bartz; Astrid Suchy-Dicey; Mitchell S V Elkind; Bruce M Psaty; Lester Y Leung; Kenneth Rice; David Tirschwell; W T Longstreth
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Variabilities in Childhood Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Incident Diabetes in Adulthood: The Bogalusa Heart Study.

Authors:  Tingting Du; Camilo Fernandez; Rupert Barshop; Vivian Fonseca; Wei Chen; Lydia A Bazzano
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  The effect of high-dose atorvastatin on neural activity and cognitive function.

Authors:  Beth A Taylor; Alecia D Dager; Gregory A Panza; Amanda L Zaleski; Shashwath Meda; Gregory Book; Michael C Stevens; Sarah Tartar; C Michael White; Donna M Polk; Godfrey D Pearlson; Paul D Thompson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Cholesterol variability and the risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Mee Kyoung Kim; Kyungdo Han; Hun-Sung Kim; Yong-Moon Park; Hyuk-Sang Kwon; Kun-Ho Yoon; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Variability in Total Cholesterol Is Associated With the Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Mee Kyoung Kim; Kyungdo Han; Eun Sil Koh; Hun-Sung Kim; Hyuk-Sang Kwon; Yong-Moon Park; Kun-Ho Yoon; Seung-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  Associations of Lipid Levels and Cognition: Findings from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.

Authors:  Melissa Lamar; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Carlos J Rodriguez; Robert C Kaplan; Marisa J Perera; Jianwen Cai; Rebeca A Espinoza Giacinto; Hector M González; Martha L Daviglus
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.892

7.  Plasma lipids are associated with white matter microstructural changes and axonal degeneration.

Authors:  Ane Iriondo; Maite García-Sebastian; Arantzazu Arrospide; Maria Arriba; Sara Aurtenetxe; Myriam Barandiaran; Montserrat Clerigue; Mirian Ecay-Torres; Ainara Estanga; Alazne Gabilondo; Andrea Izagirre; Jon Saldias; Mikel Tainta; Jorge Villanua; Javier Mar; Felix M Goñi; Pablo Martínez-Lage
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.978

8.  Associations Between 20-Year Lipid Variability Throughout Young Adulthood and Midlife Cognitive Function and Brain Integrity.

Authors:  Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri; Michelle R Caunca; Neal Jawadekar; Leslie Grasset; Tali Elfassy; Michelle C Odden; Chenkai Wu; Martine Elbejjani; Lenore Launer; Kristine Yaffe
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Visit-to-visit variability of lipid and cardiovascular events in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Ye-Xuan Cao; Liang Li; Hui-Wen Zhang; Jing-Lu Jin; Hui-Hui Liu; Yuan-Lin Guo; Na-Qiong Wu; Cheng-Gang Zhu; Qian Dong; Rui-Xia Xu; Jing Sun; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

10.  Attenuating the Variability of Lipids Is Beneficial for the Hypertension Management to Reduce the Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Older Adults.

Authors:  Yuanli Dong; Xukui Liu; Yingxin Zhao; Qiang Chai; Hua Zhang; Yumei Gao; Zhendong Liu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.