Robert V Stigliano1, Fridon Shubitidze1, James D Petryk2, Levan Shoshiashvili3, Alicia A Petryk2, P Jack Hoopes1,2. 1. a Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth College , Hanover , New Hampshire ; 2. b Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College , Hanover , New Hampshire ; 3. c Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Natural Sciences , Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University , Tbilisi , Georgia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia therapy is a promising technology for cancer treatment, involving delivering magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) into tumours then activating them using an alternating magnetic field (AMF). The system produces not only a magnetic field, but also an electric field which penetrates normal tissue and induces eddy currents, resulting in unwanted heating of normal tissues. Magnitude of the eddy current depends, in part, on the AMF source and the size of the tissue exposed to the field. The majority of in vivo MNP hyperthermia therapy studies have been performed in small animals, which, due to the spatial distribution of the AMF relative to the size of the animals, do not reveal the potential toxicity of eddy current heating in larger tissues. This has posed a non-trivial challenge for researchers attempting to scale up to clinically relevant volumes of tissue. There is a relative dearth of studies focused on decreasing the maximum temperature resulting from eddy current heating to increase therapeutic ratio. METHODS: This paper presents two simple, clinically applicable techniques for decreasing maximum temperature induced by eddy currents. Computational and experimental results are presented to understand the underlying physics of eddy currents induced in conducting, biological tissues and leverage these insights to mitigate eddy current heating during MNP hyperthermia therapy. RESULTS: Phantom studies show that the displacement and motion techniques reduce maximum temperature due to eddy currents by 74% and 19% in simulation, and by 77% and 33% experimentally. CONCLUSION: Further study is required to optimise these methods for particular scenarios; however, these results suggest larger volumes of tissue could be treated, and/or higher field strengths and frequencies could be used to attain increased MNP heating when these eddy current mitigation techniques are employed.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia therapy is a promising technology for cancer treatment, involving delivering magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) into tumours then activating them using an alternating magnetic field (AMF). The system produces not only a magnetic field, but also an electric field which penetrates normal tissue and induces eddy currents, resulting in unwanted heating of normal tissues. Magnitude of the eddy current depends, in part, on the AMF source and the size of the tissue exposed to the field. The majority of in vivo MNPhyperthermia therapy studies have been performed in small animals, which, due to the spatial distribution of the AMF relative to the size of the animals, do not reveal the potential toxicity of eddy current heating in larger tissues. This has posed a non-trivial challenge for researchers attempting to scale up to clinically relevant volumes of tissue. There is a relative dearth of studies focused on decreasing the maximum temperature resulting from eddy current heating to increase therapeutic ratio. METHODS: This paper presents two simple, clinically applicable techniques for decreasing maximum temperature induced by eddy currents. Computational and experimental results are presented to understand the underlying physics of eddy currents induced in conducting, biological tissues and leverage these insights to mitigate eddy current heating during MNPhyperthermia therapy. RESULTS: Phantom studies show that the displacement and motion techniques reduce maximum temperature due to eddy currents by 74% and 19% in simulation, and by 77% and 33% experimentally. CONCLUSION: Further study is required to optimise these methods for particular scenarios; however, these results suggest larger volumes of tissue could be treated, and/or higher field strengths and frequencies could be used to attain increased MNP heating when these eddy current mitigation techniques are employed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Eddy currents; Method of Auxiliary Sources; cancer therapy; hyperthermia; magnetic nanoparticle
Authors: Sukhoon Oh; Yeun-Chul Ryu; Giuseppe Carluccio; Christopher T Sica; Christopher M Collins Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: P R Stauffer; T C Cetas; A M Fletcher; D W DeYoung; M W Dewhirst; J R Oleson; R B Roemer Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 1984-01 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Konjeti R Sekhar; Vijayakumar N Sonar; Venkatraj Muthusamy; Soumya Sasi; Andrei Laszlo; Jamil Sawani; Nobuo Horikoshi; Ryuji Higashikubo; Robert G Bristow; Michael J Borrelli; Peter A Crooks; James R Lepock; Joseph L Roti Roti; Michael L Freeman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2007-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Anilchandra Attaluri; John Jackowski; Anirudh Sharma; Sri Kamal Kandala; Valentin Nemkov; Chris Yakey; Theodore L DeWeese; Ananda Kumar; Robert C Goldstein; Robert Ivkov Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2020 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Hassan A Albarqi; Leon H Wong; Canan Schumann; Fahad Y Sabei; Tetiana Korzun; Xiaoning Li; Mikkel N Hansen; Pallavi Dhagat; Abraham S Moses; Olena Taratula; Oleh Taratula Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Gabriel N A Rego; Mariana P Nucci; Javier B Mamani; Fernando A Oliveira; Luciana C Marti; Igor S Filgueiras; João M Ferreira; Caroline C Real; Daniele de Paula Faria; Paloma L Espinha; Daianne M C Fantacini; Lucas E B Souza; Dimas T Covas; Carlos A Buchpiguel; Lionel F Gamarra Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 5.923