Literature DB >> 24691525

Comparison of a single optimized coil and a Helmholtz pair for magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia.

Michael D Nieskoski, B Stuart Trembly.   

Abstract

Magnetic nanoparticles in a tumor can induce therapeutic heating when energized by an alternating magnetic field from a current-carrying coil outside the body. We analyzed a single-turn, air-core coil carrying a filamentary current to quantify the power absorbed by: a) magnetic nanoparticles at depth in tissue and b) superficial tissue in response to induced eddy currents; we defined this quotient as power ratio (PR). Given some limit on the eddy current heating tolerated by an alert patient, maximizing the PR maximizes the power absorbed in the tumor; all else being equal, this increases the thermal dose delivered to the tumor. The mean eddy current heating rate tolerated in four clinical studies we reviewed equaled 12.5 kW/m (3). We differentiated our analytical expression for PR with respect to the radius of the coil to find the value of radius that maximizes PR. Under reasonable simplifying assumptions, the optimal value of coil radius equaled 1.187 times the depth of the nanoparticle target below the body surface. We also derived the PR of two coils surrounding the body configured as a Helmholtz pair. We computed PR for combinations of nanoparticle depths below the surface and axial locations with respect to the coils. At depths less than 4.6 cm, the optimized single coil had a higher PR than that of the Helmholtz pair and furthermore produced less total ohmic heating within the coil. These results were independent of driving frequency, nanoparticle concentration, tissue electrical conductivity, and magnetic nanoparticle heating rate, provided the latter is assumed to be proportional to the product of frequency and the square of the local magnetic field. This paper supports the clinical application of current-carrying coils to deliver efficacious hyperthermia therapy to tumors injected with magnetic nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24691525     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2296231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  6 in total

1.  Mitigation of eddy current heating during magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia therapy.

Authors:  Robert V Stigliano; Fridon Shubitidze; James D Petryk; Levan Shoshiashvili; Alicia A Petryk; P Jack Hoopes
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 2.  A review on numerical modeling for magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia: Progress and challenges.

Authors:  Izaz Raouf; Salman Khalid; Asif Khan; Jaehun Lee; Heung Soo Kim; Min-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Therm Biol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.902

3.  Magnetic nanoparticles with high specific absorption rate of electromagnetic energy at low field strength for hyperthermia therapy.

Authors:  Fridon Shubitidze; Katsiaryna Kekalo; Robert Stigliano; Ian Baker
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  Integrating Loco-Regional Hyperthermia Into the Current Oncology Practice: SWOT and TOWS Analyses.

Authors:  Niloy R Datta; H Petra Kok; Hans Crezee; Udo S Gaipl; Stephan Bodis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Biologically Targeted Magnetic Hyperthermia: Potential and Limitations.

Authors:  David Chang; May Lim; Jeroen A C M Goos; Ruirui Qiao; Yun Yee Ng; Friederike M Mansfeld; Michael Jackson; Thomas P Davis; Maria Kavallaris
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 6.  Shaping and Focusing Magnetic Field in the Human Body: State-of-the Art and Promising Technologies.

Authors:  Sabrina Rotundo; Danilo Brizi; Alessandra Flori; Giulio Giovannetti; Luca Menichetti; Agostino Monorchio
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.847

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.