Literature DB >> 27435595

Telephonic voice intelligibility after laryngeal cancer treatment: is therapeutic approach significant?

Erika Crosetti1, Marco Fantini2, Giulia Arrigoni2, Laura Salonia3, Agata Lombardo2, Alessio Atzori4, Valentina Panetta5, Antonio Schindler6, Andy Bertolin7, Giuseppe Rizzotto7, Giovanni Succo2.   

Abstract

The aim was to investigate telephonic voice intelligibility in patients treated for laryngeal cancer using different approaches. In total, 90 patients treated for laryngeal cancer using different approaches and 12 healthy volunteers were recruited. Each patient and each healthy control read a list of words and sentences during a telephone call. Six auditors listened to each telephonic recording and transcribed the words and sentences they understood. Mean intelligibility rates for each treatment were assessed and compared. Regarding words, the poorest intelligibility was noted for type II open partial horizontal laryngectomies, followed by total laryngectomies. The best intelligibility was found for transoral laser microsurgery, followed by radiotherapy alone. For sentences, the poorest intelligibility was noted for type II open partial horizontal laryngectomies, followed by chemoradiotherapy. The best intelligibility was found for radiotherapy alone and transoral laser microsurgery. More aggressive surgery as well as chemoradiotherapy correlated with significantly poorer outcomes. Transoral laser microsurgery or radiotherapy alone ensured the best telephonic voice intelligibility. Intermediate-advanced T stages at diagnosis also showed significantly poorer intelligibility outcomes, suggesting that T stage represents an independent negative prognostic factor for voice intelligibility after treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoradiotherapy; Laryngeal cancer; Laryngectomy; Radiotherapy; Telephone communication; Transoral laser microsurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27435595     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4217-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  41 in total

1.  Application of the Voice Handicap Index in 45 patients with substitution voicing after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Mieke Moerman; Jean-Pierre Martens; Philippe Dejonckere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Subtotal laryngectomy: outcomes of 469 patients and proposal of a comprehensive and simplified classification of surgical procedures.

Authors:  G Rizzotto; E Crosetti; M Lucioni; G Succo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Voice-related quality of life in T1 glottic cancer: irradiation versus endoscopic excision.

Authors:  Seth M Cohen; C Gaelyn Garrett; William D Dupont; Robert H Ossoff; Mark S Courey
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Voice quality after supracricoid laryngectomy and total laryngectomy with insertion of voice prosthesis.

Authors:  Gabriela Torrejano; Isabel Guimarães
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Oncologic and functional outcomes of partial laryngeal surgery for intermediate-stage laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Emiro Caicedo-Granados; Daniel M Beswick; Apostolos Christopoulos; Diana E Cunningham; Ali Razfar; James P Ohr; Dwight E Heron; Robert L Ferris
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Laryngeal preservation with supracricoid partial laryngectomy results in improved quality of life when compared with total laryngectomy.

Authors:  G S Weinstein; M M El-Sawy; C Ruiz; P Dooley; A Chalian; M M El-Sayed; A Goldberg
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Preoperative and postoperative voice in Tis-T1 glottic cancer treated by endoscopic cordectomy: an additional issue for patient counseling.

Authors:  Giorgio Peretti; Cesare Piazza; Cristiano Balzanelli; Maria C Mensi; Manuela Rossini; Antonino R Antonelli
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Voice quality after treatment of early vocal cord cancer: a randomized trial comparing laser surgery with radiation therapy.

Authors:  Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Noora Rautiainen; Jaana Sellman; Kauko Saarilahti; Antti Mäkitie; Heikki Rihkanen; Jussi Laranne; Leenamaija Kleemola; Tuija Wigren; Eeva Sala; Paula Lindholm; Reidar Grenman; Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Long-term results of RTOG 91-11: a comparison of three nonsurgical treatment strategies to preserve the larynx in patients with locally advanced larynx cancer.

Authors:  Arlene A Forastiere; Qiang Zhang; Randal S Weber; Moshe H Maor; Helmuth Goepfert; Thomas F Pajak; William Morrison; Bonnie Glisson; Andy Trotti; John A Ridge; Wade Thorstad; Henry Wagner; John F Ensley; Jay S Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Voice and deglutition functions after the supracricoid and total laryngectomy procedures for advanced stage laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  James Paul Dworkin; Robert J Meleca; Mark A Zacharek; Robert J Stachler; Raza Pasha; G G Abkarian; Richard A Culatta; John R Jacobs
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.591

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Klaske E van Sluis; Lisette van der Molen; Rob J J H van Son; Frans J M Hilgers; Patrick A Bhairosing; Michiel W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Limitations and Opportunities in Open Laryngeal Organ Preservation Surgery: Current Role of OPHLs.

Authors:  Giovanni Succo; Erika Crosetti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.