Literature DB >> 11210859

Laryngeal preservation with supracricoid partial laryngectomy results in improved quality of life when compared with total laryngectomy.

G S Weinstein1, M M El-Sawy, C Ruiz, P Dooley, A Chalian, M M El-Sayed, A Goldberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESES: Study 1: To assess the oncologic outcome following supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL). Study 2: To compare the quality of life (QOL) following SCPL to total laryngectomy (TL) with tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP). Study 3: To analyze whole organ TL sections to determine the percentage of lesions amenable to SCPL STUDY
DESIGN: Study 1: A retrospective review of patients who underwent SCPL. Study 2: A non-randomized, prospective study using QOL instruments to compare patients who underwent either SCPL or TL Study 3: A retrospective histopathologic study of TL specimens assessed for the possibility of performing an SCPL.
METHODS: Study 1: Twenty-five patients with carcinoma of the larynx underwent SCPL between June 1992 and June 1999. Various rates of oncologic outcome were calculated. Study 2: Thirty-one patients participated in the QOL assessment. This included the SF-36 general health status measure, the University of Michigan Head and Neck Quality of Life (HNQOL) instrument, and the University of Michigan Voice-Related Quality of Life (VRQOL) instrument. Study 3: Ninety surgical specimens were obtained and studied from the total laryngectomy cases in the Tucker Collection. Multiple sites were evaluated for the presence of carcinoma A computer program was written to classify whether the patient was amenable to SCPL.
RESULTS: Study 1: The overall local control rate was 96% (24/25). The local control rate following SCPL with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP) was 95% (20/21). The local control rate following SCPL with cricohyoidopexy (CHP) was 100% (4/4). Study 2: The SCPL had significantly higher domain scores than TL and TEP in the following categories for the SF-36: physical function, physical limitations, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional limitations, and physical health summary. The significantly higher domains for the SCPL when compared with the TL and TEP for the HNQOL were eating and pain. Finally, when voice-related QOL was assessed with the V-RQOL, the domains of physical functioning and the total score were significantly better with SCPL when compared with TL and TEP. Study 3: Forty of 90 (44%) laryngeal whole organ specimens were determined to be resectable by SCPL. In 16 (18%) specimens, the patients could have undergone SCPL with CHEP and in 24 (27%) specimens the patients could have undergone SCPL with CHP. Among the 40 (44%) specimens determined to be able to have undergone SCPL, 19 were glottic (1 T1, 15 T2, 3 T3) and 21 were supraglottic (9 T2, 12 T3).
CONCLUSIONS: 1) A review of the literature and an analysis of the data in this study indicate that excellent local control may be expected following SCPL. 2) The QOL following SCPL, as measured by three validated QOL instruments, is superior to TL with TEP. 3) A histologic assessment of whole organ sections of TL specimens indicates that many patients who have been subjected to TL may have been candidates for SCPL. 4) If the indications and contraindications are rigorously adhered to, SCPLs are reasonable alternatives to TL in selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11210859     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200102000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  18 in total

Review 1.  Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy: what do we not know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  Antonio Schindler; Nicole Pizzorni; Francesco Mozzanica; Marco Fantini; Daniela Ginocchio; Andy Bertolin; Erika Crosetti; Giovanni Succo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Telephonic voice intelligibility after laryngeal cancer treatment: is therapeutic approach significant?

Authors:  Erika Crosetti; Marco Fantini; Giulia Arrigoni; Laura Salonia; Agata Lombardo; Alessio Atzori; Valentina Panetta; Antonio Schindler; Andy Bertolin; Giuseppe Rizzotto; Giovanni Succo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The amount of treatment versus quality of life in patients formerly treated for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  H J Aarstad; A K H Aarstad; S Lybak; O Monge; D F Haugen; J Olofsson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Correlation between coping strategies and subjective assessment of the voice-related quality of life of patients after resection of T1 and T2 laryngeal tumours.

Authors:  E Seiferlein; T Haderlein; M Schuster; E Gräßel; C Bohr
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Vocal fold surgery of benign inflammatory lesions of Reinke's space: an outcome study in 47 subjects.

Authors:  Joost J S van Dinther; Marc De Bodt; Floris L Wuyts; Paul H Van de Heyning
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  [Measuring quality of life in head and neck cancer. Current status and future needs].

Authors:  A Dietz; A Meyer; S Singer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Assessing quality of life in patients after partial laryngectomy.

Authors:  F Hebel; K Mantsopoulos; C Bohr
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.471

8.  Evaluation of health-related quality of life with EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 in Romanian laryngeal cancer patients.

Authors:  F V Dinescu; C Ţiple; Magdalena Chirilă; R Mureşan; T Drugan; M Cosgarea
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Head and neck cancer pain: systematic review of prevalence and associated factors.

Authors:  Tatiana V Macfarlane; Tanja Wirth; Sriyani Ranasinghe; Kim W Ah-See; Nick Renny; David Hurman
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2012-04-01

Review 10.  Organ preservation surgery for laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Sharad Chawla; Andrew Simon Carney
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2009-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.