Literature DB >> 25304787

Voice quality after treatment of early vocal cord cancer: a randomized trial comparing laser surgery with radiation therapy.

Leena-Maija Aaltonen1, Noora Rautiainen2, Jaana Sellman2, Kauko Saarilahti3, Antti Mäkitie4, Heikki Rihkanen4, Jussi Laranne5, Leenamaija Kleemola5, Tuija Wigren6, Eeva Sala7, Paula Lindholm8, Reidar Grenman7, Heikki Joensuu3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Early laryngeal cancer is usually treated with either transoral laser surgery or radiation therapy. The quality of voice achieved with these treatments has not been compared in a randomized trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Male patients with carcinoma limited to 1 mobile vocal cord (T1aN0M0) were randomly assigned to receive either laser surgery (n=32) or external beam radiation therapy (n=28). Surgery consisted of tumor excision with a CO2 laser with the patient under general anaesthesia. External beam radiation therapy to the larynx was delivered to a cumulative dose of 66 Gy in 2-Gy daily fractions over 6.5 weeks. Voice quality was assessed at baseline and 6 and 24 months after treatment. The main outcome measures were expert-rated voice quality on a grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain (GRBAS) scale, videolaryngostroboscopic findings, and the patients' self-rated voice quality and its impact on activities of daily living.
RESULTS: Overall voice quality between the groups was rated similar, but voice was more breathy and the glottal gap was wider in patients treated with laser surgery than in those who received radiation therapy. Patients treated with radiation therapy reported less hoarseness-related inconvenience in daily living 2 years after treatment. Three patients in each group had local cancer recurrence within 2 years from randomization.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy may be the treatment of choice for patients whose requirements for voice quality are demanding. Overall voice quality was similar in both treatment groups, however, indicating a need for careful consideration of patient-related factors in the choice of a treatment option.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25304787     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  34 in total

1.  Telephonic voice intelligibility after laryngeal cancer treatment: is therapeutic approach significant?

Authors:  Erika Crosetti; Marco Fantini; Giulia Arrigoni; Laura Salonia; Agata Lombardo; Alessio Atzori; Valentina Panetta; Antonio Schindler; Andy Bertolin; Giuseppe Rizzotto; Giovanni Succo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  T1-2 glottic cancer treated with radiotherapy and/or surgery.

Authors:  Mohamed Shelan; Lukas Anschuetz; Adrian D Schubert; Beat Bojaxhiu; Alan Dal Pra; Frank Behrensmeier; Daniel M Aebersold; Roland Giger; Olgun Elicin
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  When is definitive radiotherapy the preferred treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?

Authors:  William M Mendenhall; Primož Strojan; Avraham Eisbruch; Robert Smee; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A comparison of phonatory outcome between trans-oral CO2 Laser cordectomy and radiotherapy in T1 glottic cancer.

Authors:  Sachin Gandhi; Shashank Gupta; Govind Rajopadhye
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Current treatment of T1N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx.

Authors:  William M Mendenhall; Robert P Takes; Jatin P Shah; Patrick J Bradley; Jonathan J Beitler; Primož Strojan; Carlos Suárez; Juan P Rodrigo; Nabil F Saba; Alessandra Rinaldo; Jochen A Werner; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Outcomes of carotid-sparing IMRT for T1 glottic cancer: Comparison with conventional radiation.

Authors:  Abdallah S R Mohamed; Blaine D Smith; Joshua B Smith; Parag Sevak; Jessica S Malek; Aasheesh Kanwar; Theodora Browne; G Brandon Gunn; Adam S Garden; Steven J Frank; William H Morrison; Jack Phan; Mark Zafereo; Heath Skinner; Stephen Y Lai; Katherine A Hutcheson; Jan S Lewin; Amy E Hessel; Apurva A Thekdi; Randal S Weber; Clifton D Fuller; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Expression of p27 and PTEN and clinical characteristics in early laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and their correlation with recurrence.

Authors:  Jun-Quan Yang; Zhen Liang; Meng Wu; Yu-Man Sun; Hong-Xia Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01

8.  Patterns of Care for Patients With Early-Stage Glottic Cancer Undergoing Definitive Radiation Therapy: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Authors:  William A Stokes; Diana Abbott; Andy Phan; David Raben; Ryan M Lanning; Sana D Karam
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Outcomes after radiation therapy for T2N0/stage II glottic squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Karine A Al Feghali; Bassem Y Youssef; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Lara Hilal; Blaine D Smith; Ibrahim Abu-Gheida; Georges Farha; G Brandon Gunn; Jack Phan; Jan Lewin; Apurva Thekdi; William H Morrison; Adam S Garden; Clifton David Fuller; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  Objective and self-evaluation voice analysis after transoral laser cordectomy and radiotherapy in T1a-T1b glottic cancer.

Authors:  Nicola Lombardo; Teodoro Aragona; Said Alsayyad; Girolamo Pelaia; Rosa Terracciano; Rocco Savino
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.