Literature DB >> 27434649

Same-Single-Cell Analysis of Pacemaker-Specific Markers in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocyte Subtypes Classified by Electrophysiology.

Sergey Yechikov1, Raul Copaciu2, Jessica M Gluck1, Wenbin Deng3, Nipavan Chiamvimonvat1,4, James W Chan5,6, Deborah K Lieu1.   

Abstract

Insights into the expression of pacemaker-specific markers in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocyte subtypes can facilitate the enrichment and track differentiation and maturation of hiPSC-derived pacemaker-like cardiomyocytes. To date, no study has directly assessed gene expression in each pacemaker-, atria-, and ventricular-like cardiomyocyte subtype derived from hiPSCs since currently the subtypes of these immature cardiomyocytes can only be identified by action potential profiles. Traditional acquisition of action potentials using patch-clamp recordings renders the cells unviable for subsequent analysis. We circumvented these issues by acquiring the action potential profile of a single cell optically followed by assessment of protein expression through immunostaining in that same cell. Our same-single-cell analysis for the first time revealed expression of proposed pacemaker-specific markers-hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-modulated (HCN)4 channel and Islet (Isl)1-at the protein level in all three hiPSC-derived cardiomyocyte subtypes. HCN4 expression was found to be higher in pacemaker-like hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes than atrial- and ventricular-like subtypes but its downregulation over time in all subtypes diminished the differences. Isl1 expression in pacemaker-like hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes was initially not statistically different than the contractile subtypes but did become statistically higher than ventricular-like cells with time. Our observations suggest that although HCN4 and Isl1 are differentially expressed in hiPSC-derived pacemaker-like relative to ventricular-like cardiomyocytes, these markers alone are insufficient in identifying hiPSC-derived pacemaker-like cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells 2016;34:2670-2680.
© 2016 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiomyocyte subtype; Electrophysiology; Human induced pluripotent stem cells; Pacemaker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27434649      PMCID: PMC5798452          DOI: 10.1002/stem.2466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  29 in total

Review 1.  The sinoatrial node, a heterogeneous pacemaker structure.

Authors:  M R Boyett; H Honjo; I Kodama
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  Functional role of L-type Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels in cardiac pacemaker activity.

Authors:  Matteo E Mangoni; Brigitte Couette; Emmanuel Bourinet; Josef Platzer; Daniel Reimer; Jörg Striessnig; Joël Nargeot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Small molecule-mediated directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells toward ventricular cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Ioannis Karakikes; Grant D Senyei; Jens Hansen; Chi-Wing Kong; Evren U Azeloglu; Francesca Stillitano; Deborah K Lieu; Jiaxian Wang; Lihuan Ren; Jean-Sebastien Hulot; Ravi Iyengar; Ronald A Li; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.940

4.  Neuregulin/ErbB signaling regulates cardiac subtype specification in differentiating human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Wei-Zhong Zhu; Yiheng Xie; Kara White Moyes; Joseph D Gold; Bardia Askari; Michael A Laflamme
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  RNA sequencing of mouse sinoatrial node reveals an upstream regulatory role for Islet-1 in cardiac pacemaker cells.

Authors:  Vasanth Vedantham; Giselle Galang; Melissa Evangelista; Rahul C Deo; Deepak Srivastava
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Transcription factor ISL1 is essential for pacemaker development and function.

Authors:  Xingqun Liang; Qingquan Zhang; Paola Cattaneo; Shaowei Zhuang; Xiaohui Gong; Nathanael J Spann; Cizhong Jiang; Xinkai Cao; Xiaodong Zhao; Xiaoli Zhang; Lei Bu; Gang Wang; H S Vincent Chen; Tao Zhuang; Jie Yan; Peng Geng; Lina Luo; Indroneal Banerjee; Yihan Chen; Christopher K Glass; Alexander C Zambon; Ju Chen; Yunfu Sun; Sylvia M Evans
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Myosin light chain 2-based selection of human iPSC-derived early ventricular cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  Alexandra Bizy; Guadalupe Guerrero-Serna; Bin Hu; Daniela Ponce-Balbuena; B Cicero Willis; Manuel Zarzoso; Rafael J Ramirez; Michelle F Sener; Lakshmi V Mundada; Matthew Klos; Eric J Devaney; Karen L Vikstrom; Todd J Herron; José Jalife
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.020

8.  Na+/Ca2+ exchanger is a determinant of excitation-contraction coupling in human embryonic stem cell-derived ventricular cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Ji-Dong Fu; Peng Jiang; Stephanie Rushing; Jing Liu; Nipavan Chiamvimonvat; Ronald A Li
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 9.  Molecular regulation of cardiac chamber-specific gene expression.

Authors:  Eric M Small; Paul A Krieg
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.677

10.  SHOX2 overexpression favors differentiation of embryonic stem cells into cardiac pacemaker cells, improving biological pacing ability.

Authors:  Vittoria Ionta; Wenbin Liang; Elizabeth H Kim; Reza Rafie; Alessandro Giacomello; Eduardo Marbán; Hee Cheol Cho
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 7.765

View more
  14 in total

1.  Human induced pluripotent stem cell line with genetically encoded fluorescent voltage indicator generated via CRISPR for action potential assessment post-cardiogenesis.

Authors:  Yao-Hui Sun; Hillary K J Kao; Che-Wei Chang; Alexander Merleev; James L Overton; Dalyir Pretto; Sergey Yechikov; Emanual Maverakis; Nipavan Chiamvimonvat; James W Chan; Deborah K Lieu
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.277

2.  An intrinsic, label-free signal for identifying stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte subtype.

Authors:  Che-Wei Chang; Hillary K J Kao; Sergey Yechikov; Deborah K Lieu; James W Chan
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  Application of FluoVolt Membrane Potential Dye for Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiac Single Cells and Monolayers Differentiated via Embryoid Bodies.

Authors:  Tadashi Takaki; Yoshinori Yoshida
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Optophysiology of cardiomyocytes: characterizing cellular motion with quantitative phase imaging.

Authors:  Christine Cordeiro; Oscar J Abilez; Georges Goetz; Tushar Gupta; Yan Zhuge; Olav Solgaard; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Improved Generation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiac Pacemaker Cells Using Novel Differentiation Protocols.

Authors:  Fabrice F Darche; Nina D Ullrich; Ziqiang Huang; Michael Koenen; Rasmus Rivinius; Norbert Frey; Patrick A Schweizer
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Optical Recording of Action Potentials in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiac Single Cells and Monolayers Generated from Long QT Syndrome Type 1 Patients.

Authors:  Tadashi Takaki; Azusa Inagaki; Kazuhisa Chonabayashi; Keiji Inoue; Kenji Miki; Seiko Ohno; Takeru Makiyama; Minoru Horie; Yoshinori Yoshida
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 5.443

7.  Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing and Optical Electrophysiology of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes Reveal Discordance Between Cardiac Subtype-Associated Gene Expression Patterns and Electrophysiological Phenotypes.

Authors:  Sherri M Biendarra-Tiegs; Xing Li; Dan Ye; Emma B Brandt; Michael J Ackerman; Timothy J Nelson
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 8.  Subtype-specific cardiomyocytes for precision medicine: Where are we now?

Authors:  Ming-Tao Zhao; Ning-Yi Shao; Vidu Garg
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 5.845

Review 9.  Concise Review: Criteria for Chamber-Specific Categorization of Human Cardiac Myocytes Derived from Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Christopher Kane; Cesare M N Terracciano
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 10.  Cellular models for human cardiomyopathy: What is the best option?

Authors:  Nerea Jimenez-Tellez; Steven C Greenway
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2019-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.