RATIONALE: Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) exhibit either a "working" chamber or a nodal-like phenotype. To generate optimal hESC-CM preparations for eventual clinical application in cell-based therapies, we will need to control their differentiation into these specialized cardiac subtypes. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate intact neuregulin (NRG)-1β/ErbB signaling in hESC-CMs and test the hypothesis that this signaling pathway regulates cardiac subtype abundance in hESC-CM cultures. METHODS AND RESULTS: All experiments used hESC-CM cultures generated using our recently reported directed differentiation protocol. To support subsequent action potential phenotyping approaches and provide a higher-throughput method of determining cardiac subtype, we first developed and validated a novel genetic label that identifies nodal-type hESC-CMs. Next, control hESC-CM preparations were compared to those differentiated in the presence of exogenous NRG-1β, an anti-NRG-1β neutralizing antibody, or the ErbB antagonist AG1478. We used 3 independent approaches to determine the ratio of cardiac subtypes in the resultant populations: direct action potential phenotyping under current-clamp, activation of the aforementioned genetic label, and subtype-specific marker expression by RT-PCR. Using all 3 end points, we found that inhibition of NRG-1β/ErbB signaling greatly enhanced the proportion of cells showing the nodal phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: NRG-1β/ErbB signaling regulates the ratio of nodal- to working-type cells in differentiating hESC-CM cultures and presumably functions similarly during early human heart development. We speculate that, by manipulating NRG-1β/ErbB signaling, it will be possible to generate preparations of enriched working-type myocytes for infarct repair, or, conversely, nodal cells for potential use in a biological pacemaker.
RATIONALE: Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) exhibit either a "working" chamber or a nodal-like phenotype. To generate optimal hESC-CM preparations for eventual clinical application in cell-based therapies, we will need to control their differentiation into these specialized cardiac subtypes. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate intact neuregulin (NRG)-1β/ErbB signaling in hESC-CMs and test the hypothesis that this signaling pathway regulates cardiac subtype abundance in hESC-CM cultures. METHODS AND RESULTS: All experiments used hESC-CM cultures generated using our recently reported directed differentiation protocol. To support subsequent action potential phenotyping approaches and provide a higher-throughput method of determining cardiac subtype, we first developed and validated a novel genetic label that identifies nodal-type hESC-CMs. Next, control hESC-CM preparations were compared to those differentiated in the presence of exogenous NRG-1β, an anti-NRG-1β neutralizing antibody, or the ErbB antagonist AG1478. We used 3 independent approaches to determine the ratio of cardiac subtypes in the resultant populations: direct action potential phenotyping under current-clamp, activation of the aforementioned genetic label, and subtype-specific marker expression by RT-PCR. Using all 3 end points, we found that inhibition of NRG-1β/ErbB signaling greatly enhanced the proportion of cells showing the nodal phenotype. CONCLUSIONS:NRG-1β/ErbB signaling regulates the ratio of nodal- to working-type cells in differentiating hESC-CM cultures and presumably functions similarly during early human heart development. We speculate that, by manipulating NRG-1β/ErbB signaling, it will be possible to generate preparations of enriched working-type myocytes for infarct repair, or, conversely, nodal cells for potential use in a biological pacemaker.
Authors: Milica Radisic; Hyoungshin Park; Helen Shing; Thomas Consi; Frederick J Schoen; Robert Langer; Lisa E Freed; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-12-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Thomas Horsthuis; Henk P J Buermans; Janynke F Brons; Arie O Verkerk; Martijn L Bakker; Vincent Wakker; Danielle E W Clout; Antoon F M Moorman; Peter A C 't Hoen; Vincent M Christoffels Journal: Circ Res Date: 2009-06-04 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: B Delorme; E Dahl; T Jarry-Guichard; I Marics; J P Briand; K Willecke; D Gros; M Théveniau-Ruissy Journal: Dev Dyn Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 3.780
Authors: J Xavier-Neto; C M Neville; M D Shapiro; L Houghton; G F Wang; W Nikovits; F E Stockdale; N Rosenthal Journal: Development Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Chunhui Xu; Shailaja Police; Mohammad Hassanipour; Yan Li; Yinhong Chen; Catherine Priest; Chris O'Sullivan; Michael A Laflamme; Wei-Zhong Zhu; Benjamin Van Biber; Livia Hegerova; Jiwei Yang; Karen Delavan-Boorsma; Anthony Davies; Jane Lebkowski; Joseph D Gold Journal: Regen Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.806
Authors: Matthew E Hartman; Yonggang Liu; Wei-Zhong Zhu; Wei-Ming Chien; Chad S Weldy; Glenn I Fishman; Michael A Laflamme; Michael T Chin Journal: FASEB J Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Meredith A Roberts; Dominic Tran; Kareen L K Coulombe; Maria Razumova; Michael Regnier; Charles E Murry; Ying Zheng Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 3.845