Literature DB >> 27433259

Ultrasound clinical progress monitoring: Who, where and how?

Gill Harrison1.   

Abstract

Prior to assessment of final ultrasound clinical competency it is important to monitor clinical progress, provide high quality feedback and encourage skills development. The role of the supervisor, mentor and assessor are fundamental to the on-going progress monitoring of ultrasound trainees. This article forms the second part of a larger project which was to elicit ultrasound practitioners' opinions on how progress should be monitored, where and by whom. An on-line questionnaire was used to gain opinions from ultrasound practitioners. Totally, 116 responses were received from professionals with an interest in ultrasound assessment. Results suggested that experienced, qualified ultrasound practitioners should undertake the role of supervisor and assessor, having been prepared for that role by the training centre. Formative monitoring should take place both within the clinical department and possibly the training centre, using a range of methods. Following completion of the training, practitioners should have a preceptorship period to consolidate their knowledge and skills for 3 to 6 months or until further competencies have been demonstrated. Formative progress monitoring should be a recognised part of ultrasound training. Essentially, staff undertaking supervision and assessor roles should be supported and trained to ensure a high quality, consistent learning experience for ultrasound trainees. Additionally, they should provide appropriate feedback to the trainee and education centre.

Keywords:  Clinical competency; formative assessment; supervision; ultrasound

Year:  2015        PMID: 27433259      PMCID: PMC4760597          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X15600006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  8 in total

1.  Trainee doctors' views on workplace-based assessments: Are they just a tick box exercise?

Authors:  Taruna Bindal; David Wall; Helen M Goodyear
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  An online training resource for clinical supervision.

Authors:  Karen McColgan; Catherine Rice
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2012 Feb 15-21

3.  A framework for guiding learning in ultrasound scanning.

Authors:  Gillian Crofts
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-12-04

4.  Twelve tips for implementing tools for direct observation of medical trainees' clinical skills during patient encounters.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Eric S Holmboe; Jennifer R Kogan
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Grades in formative workplace-based assessment: a study of what works for whom and why.

Authors:  Janet Lefroy; Ashley Hawarden; Simon P Gay; Robert K McKinley; Jennifer Cleland
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Improving health care professionals' feedback on communication skills: development of an on-line resource.

Authors:  Gill Harrison; Sheila Hayden; Viv Cook; Annie Cushing
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-07-12

7.  Evaluating and giving feedback to mentors: new evidence-based approaches.

Authors:  Lauren Anderson; Karin Silet; Michael Fleming
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.689

8.  Summative clinical competency assessment: A survey of ultrasound practitioners' views.

Authors:  Gill Harrison
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2014-09-17
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Educating the future sonographic workforce: membership survey report from the British Medical Ultrasound Society.

Authors:  P C Parker; G Harrison
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-09-29

2.  Neonatal brain ultrasound training for beginners: Could a head phantom be useful?

Authors:  Antonio La Torre; Carmen Beatriz Visioli
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2020-01-28

3.  Adaptation of an anatomy graduate course in ultrasound imaging from in-person to live, remote instruction during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Robert M DePhilip; Melissa M Quinn
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.