Literature DB >> 32831891

Neonatal brain ultrasound training for beginners: Could a head phantom be useful?

Antonio La Torre1, Carmen Beatriz Visioli2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The traditional method of teaching the technique of neonatal brain ultrasonography is based upon the interaction between the practitioner and the neonate under the supervision of a tutor. This approach has disadvantages in that it may result in a longer imaging examination and the patient may become agitated. As demand for ultrasound services escalates and departments get busier, this often means that the trainee and supervisor are under pressure to work rapidly. Such environments are common but not conducive to the development of adequate skills and competencies. A neonatal head phantom used as part of a dedicated study day could help the beginner to learn basic elements of the ultrasound examination within a safe stress-free environment. It offers the opportunity to repeat the examination as often as the trainee wishes without time pressures and the distraction of a moving and potentially very sick baby. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a commercial phantom as a means for the practitioner to acquire the fundamental principles of neonatal brain ultrasound.
METHOD: A total of 17 participants attending a one day neonatal ultrasound course aimed at beginners were invited to complete a short two-part questionnaire that assessed their perceived improvement in scanning ability before and after using a commercially available head phantom.
RESULTS: Of the 14 returned questionnaires, the overall perceived understanding, ability and confidence improved and anxiety levels about the procedure fell. The median pre-training score was 9.0 compared with the median post-training score of 12.0 (P = 0.005, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). At least 79% (up to 86%) of participants valued their experience with the phantom and would recommend the course to colleagues. Furthermore, about two-thirds reported that they would like to have additional practise with the phantom. Preliminary data from this study suggest that beginners found the head phantom useful for mastering some of the early skills required for neonatal brain ultrasound examinations, which in turn improved their confidence and reduced anxiety.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sonography; cranial; education; infant; simulator

Year:  2020        PMID: 32831891      PMCID: PMC7412942          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X19894612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  10 in total

1.  Physician training requirements in sonography: how many cases are needed for competence?

Authors:  B S Hertzberg; M A Kliewer; J D Bowie; B A Carroll; D H DeLong; L Gray; R C Nelson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Homemade ultrasound phantom for teaching identification of superficial soft tissue abscess.

Authors:  Mark D Lo; S Heath Ackley; Patrick Solari
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 3.  A review of computer-based simulators for ultrasound training.

Authors:  Tobias Blum; Andreas Rieger; Nassir Navab; Helmut Friess; Marc Martignoni
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.929

4.  A training phantom for ultrasound-guided needle insertion and suturing.

Authors:  Khashayar Nattagh; Timmy Siauw; Jean Pouliot; I-Chow Hsu; J Adam Cunha
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Ultrasound clinical progress monitoring: Who, where and how?

Authors:  Gill Harrison
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-05-17

6.  A web-based modern ultrasound diagnostic scanner simulation (SimulUS) for undergraduate medical e-learning education.

Authors:  Christian Kollmann; Marko Flor; Robert Bader
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.611

7.  Creation and Validation of a Simulator for Neonatal Brain Ultrasonography: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Andy Tsai; Carol E Barnewolt; Sanjay P Prabhu; Reimi Yonekura; Andrew Hosmer; Noah E Schulz; Peter H Weinstock
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Interobserver variability in assessment of cranial ultrasound in very preterm infants.

Authors:  C F Hagmann; M Halbherr; B Koller; P Wintermark; T Huisman; H U Bucher
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.447

9.  International Summit 2014: Organisation of clinical ultrasound in the world.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-11-06

10.  Anatomically realistic ultrasound phantoms using gel wax with 3D printed moulds.

Authors:  Efthymios Maneas; Wenfeng Xia; Daniil I Nikitichev; Batol Daher; Maniragav Manimaran; Rui Yen J Wong; Chia-Wei Chang; Benyamin Rahmani; Claudio Capelli; Silvia Schievano; Gaetano Burriesci; Sebastien Ourselin; Anna L David; Malcolm C Finlay; Simeon J West; Tom Vercauteren; Adrien E Desjardins
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.609

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.