Literature DB >> 27433232

Summative clinical competency assessment: A survey of ultrasound practitioners' views.

Gill Harrison1.   

Abstract

Clinical competency and the assessment of core skills is a crucial element of any programme leading to an award with a clinical skills component. This has become a more prominent feature of current reports on quality health care provision. This project aimed to determine ultrasound practitioners' opinions about how best to assess clinical competency. An on-line questionnaire was sent to contacts from the Consortium for the Accreditation of Sonographic Education and details distributed at the British Medical Ultrasound Society conference in 2011. One hundred and sixteen responses were received from a range of clinical staff with an interest in ultrasound assessment. The majority of respondents suggested that competency assessments should take place in the clinical departments with or without an element of assessment at the education centre. Moderation was an important area highlighted by respondents, with 84% of respondents suggesting that two assessors were required and 66% of those stating some element of external moderation should be included. The findings suggest that respondents' preference is for some clinical competency assessments to take place on routine lists within the clinical department, assessed by two people one of which would be an external assessor. In view of recent reports relating to training and assessment of health care professionals, the ultrasound profession needs to begin the debate about how best to assess clinical competence and ensure appropriate first post-competency of anyone undertaking ultrasound examinations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical competency; assessment; practice; ultrasound

Year:  2014        PMID: 27433232      PMCID: PMC4760562          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X14550238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  7 in total

1.  Model for directly assessing and improving clinical competence and performance in revalidation of clinicians.

Authors:  R K McKinley; R C Fraser; R Baker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-24

Review 2.  Clinical competence assessment in nursing: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Roger Watson; Anne Stimpson; Annie Topping; Davina Porock
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  AMEE Guide No. 25: The assessment of learning outcomes for the competent and reflective physician.

Authors:  J M Shumway; R M Harden
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Current perspectives in assessment: the assessment of performance at work.

Authors:  John J Norcini
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference.

Authors:  John Norcini; Brownell Anderson; Valdes Bollela; Vanessa Burch; Manuel João Costa; Robbert Duvivier; Robert Galbraith; Richard Hays; Athol Kent; Vanessa Perrott; Trudie Roberts
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  A proposed new clinical assessment framework for diagnostic medical ultrasound students.

Authors:  Vivien Gibbs
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2013-12-02

Review 7.  Emergency physician-performed ultrasound to diagnose cholelithiasis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marshall Ross; Michael Brown; Kyle McLaughlin; Paul Atkinson; Jenny Thompson; Susan Powelson; Steve Clark; Eddy Lang
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.451

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Ultrasound clinical progress monitoring: Who, where and how?

Authors:  Gill Harrison
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-05-17

2.  Educating the future sonographic workforce: membership survey report from the British Medical Ultrasound Society.

Authors:  P C Parker; G Harrison
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-09-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.