Literature DB >> 10068617

Maximal horizontal flight performance of hummingbirds: effects of body mass and molt.

P Chai1, D L Altshuler, D B Stephens, M E Dillon.   

Abstract

Hovering and fast forward flapping represent two strenuous types of flight that differ in aerodynamic power requirement. Maximal capabilities of ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) in hovering and forward flight were compared under varying body mass and wing area. The capability to hover in low-density gas mixtures was adversely affected by body mass, whereas the capability to fly in a wind tunnel did not show any adverse mass effect. Molting birds that lost primary flight feathers and reduced wing area also displayed mass loss and loss of aerodynamic power and flight speed. This suggests that maximal flight speed is insensitive to short-term perturbations of body mass but that molting is stressful and reduces the birds' speed and capacity for chase and escape. Hummingbirds' flight behavior in confined space was also investigated. Birds reduced their speeds flying through a narrow tube to approximately one-fifth of that in the wind tunnel and did not display differences under varying body mass and wing area. Hence, performance in the flight tube was submaximal and did not correlate with performance variation in the wind tunnel. For ruby-throated hummingbirds, both maximal mass-specific aerodynamic power derived from hovering performance in low-density air media and maximal flight velocity measured in the wind tunnel were invariant with body mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10068617     DOI: 10.1086/316652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool        ISSN: 1522-2152            Impact factor:   2.247


  4 in total

1.  Wingbeat kinematics and energetics during weightlifting in hovering hummingbirds across an elevational gradient.

Authors:  Derrick J E Groom; M Cecilia B Toledo; Kenneth C Welch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost.

Authors:  Douglas L Altshuler; Robert Dudley; Jimmy A McGuire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Flight costs of long, sexually selected tails in hummingbirds.

Authors:  Christopher James Clark; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Intra-specific variation in wing morphology and its impact on take-off performance in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) during escape flights.

Authors:  Laura McFarlane; John D Altringham; Graham N Askew
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.312

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.