Literature DB >> 19569407

Environmental contingencies and genetic propensities: social capital, educational continuation, and dopamine receptor gene DRD2.

Michael J Shanahan1, Stephen Vaisey, Lance D Erickson, Andrew Smolen.   

Abstract

Studies of gene-environment interplay typically focus on one environmental factor at a time, resulting in a constrained view of social context. The concept of environmental contingency is introduced as a corrective. Drawing on the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health and qualitative comparative analysis, the authors focus on an example involving social capital, a gene associated with a dopamine receptor (DRD2), and educational continuation beyond secondary school. For boys, (1) DRD2 risk is associated with a decreased likelihood of school continuation; (2) one configuration of social capital -- high parental socioeconomic status, high parental involvement in school, and a high-quality school -- compensates for this negative relationship, consistent with environmental contingency; but (3) boys with DRD2 risk are less commonly observed in settings that are rich in social capital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19569407     DOI: 10.1086/592204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJS        ISSN: 0002-9602


  18 in total

1.  Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fs/QCA) to explore the relationship between medical "homeness" and quality.

Authors:  Nels Marcus Thygeson; Leif I Solberg; Stephen E Asche; Patricia Fontaine; Leonard Gregory Pawlson; Sarah Hudson Scholle
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Gene by Social-Environment Interaction for Youth Delinquency and Violence: Thirty-Nine Aggression-related Genes.

Authors:  Hexuan Liu; Yi Li; Guang Guo
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2015

3.  Cohort Profile: The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health).

Authors:  Kathleen Mullan Harris; Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Eric A Whitsel; Jon M Hussey; Ley A Killeya-Jones; Joyce Tabor; Sarah C Dean
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Lifetime Socioeconomic Status, Historical Context, and Genetic Inheritance in Shaping Body Mass in Middle and Late Adulthood.

Authors:  Hexuan Liu; Guang Guo
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2015-08

5.  Opportunities and challenges of big data for the social sciences: The case of genomic data.

Authors:  Hexuan Liu; Guang Guo
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2016-04-21

6.  The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) sibling pairs data.

Authors:  Kathleen Mullan Harris; Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Brett C Haberstick; Andrew Smolen
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 1.587

7.  Social Environmental Variation, Plasticity Genes, and Aggression: Evidence for the Differential Susceptibility Hypothesis.

Authors:  Ronald L Simons; Man Kit Lei; Steven R H Beach; Gene H Brody; Robert A Philibert; Frederick X Gibbons
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2011-12

8.  The effect of neighborhood disadvantage, social ties, and genetic variation on the antisocial behavior of African American women: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Man-Kit Lei; Ronald L Simons; Mary Bond Edmond; Leslie Gordon Simons; Carolyn E Cutrona
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2014-04-08

9.  Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil; Julie Baldwin; Heather Hampel; Rita D DeBate
Journal:  J Mix Methods Res       Date:  2015-02-25

10.  Sociogenomics in the 21st Century: An Introduction to the History and Potential of Genetically-informed Social Science.

Authors:  David B Braudt
Journal:  Sociol Compass       Date:  2018-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.