V F S Dubois1, E Casarotto1, M Danhof1, O Della Pasqua2,3,4. 1. Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. o.dellapasqua@ucl.ac.uk. 3. Clinical Pharmacology Modelling and Simulation, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, UK. o.dellapasqua@ucl.ac.uk. 4. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK. o.dellapasqua@ucl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Functional measures of human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG; Kv 11.1) channel inhibition have been prioritized as an in vitro screening tool for candidate molecules. However, it is unclear how these results can be translated to humans. Here, we explore how data on drug binding and functional inhibition in vitro relate to QT prolongation in vivo. Using cisapride, sotalol and moxifloxacin as paradigm compounds, we assessed the relationship between drug concentrations, binding, functional measures and in vivo effects in preclinical species and humans. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling was used to characterize the drug effects in hERG functional patch clamp, hERG radio-labelled dofetilide displacement experiments and QT interval in conscious dogs. Data were analysed in parallel to identify potential correlations between pharmacological activity in vitro and in vivo. KEY RESULTS: An Emax model could not be used due to large variability in the functional patch clamp assay. Dofetilide displacement revealed that binding curves are unrelated to the in vivo potency estimates for QTc prolongation in dogs and humans. Mean in vitro potency estimates ranged from 99.9 nM for cisapride to 1030 μM for moxifloxacin. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The lack of standardized protocols for in vitro assays leads to significant differences in experimental conditions, making the assessment of in vitro-in vivo correlations unreliable. Identification of an accurate safety window during the screening of candidate molecules requires a quantitative framework that disentangles system- from drug-specific properties under physiological conditions, enabling translation of the results to humans. Similar considerations will be relevant for the comprehensive in vitro pro-arrhythmia assay initiative.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Functional measures of human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG; Kv 11.1) channel inhibition have been prioritized as an in vitro screening tool for candidate molecules. However, it is unclear how these results can be translated to humans. Here, we explore how data on drug binding and functional inhibition in vitro relate to QT prolongation in vivo. Using cisapride, sotalol and moxifloxacin as paradigm compounds, we assessed the relationship between drug concentrations, binding, functional measures and in vivo effects in preclinical species and humans. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling was used to characterize the drug effects in hERG functional patch clamp, hERG radio-labelled dofetilide displacement experiments and QT interval in conscious dogs. Data were analysed in parallel to identify potential correlations between pharmacological activity in vitro and in vivo. KEY RESULTS: An Emax model could not be used due to large variability in the functional patch clamp assay. Dofetilide displacement revealed that binding curves are unrelated to the in vivo potency estimates for QTc prolongation in dogs and humans. Mean in vitro potency estimates ranged from 99.9 nM for cisapride to 1030 μM for moxifloxacin. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The lack of standardized protocols for in vitro assays leads to significant differences in experimental conditions, making the assessment of in vitro-in vivo correlations unreliable. Identification of an accurate safety window during the screening of candidate molecules requires a quantitative framework that disentangles system- from drug-specific properties under physiological conditions, enabling translation of the results to humans. Similar considerations will be relevant for the comprehensive in vitro pro-arrhythmia assay initiative.
Authors: G Eichenbaum; M K Pugsley; D J Gallacher; R Towart; G McIntyre; U Shukla; J M Davenport; H R Lu; J Rohrbacher; V Hillsamer Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Meindert Danhof; Elizabeth C M de Lange; Oscar E Della Pasqua; Bart A Ploeger; Rob A Voskuyl Journal: Trends Pharmacol Sci Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 14.819
Authors: William Lee; Stefan A Mann; Monique J Windley; Mohammad S Imtiaz; Jamie I Vandenberg; Adam P Hill Journal: Prog Biophys Mol Biol Date: 2015-12-20 Impact factor: 3.667
Authors: Kenny J Watson; William P Gorczyca; John Umland; Ying Zhang; Xian Chen; Sunny Z Sun; Bernard Fermini; Mark Holbrook; Piet H Van Der Graaf Journal: J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Hg Laverty; C Benson; Ej Cartwright; Mj Cross; C Garland; T Hammond; C Holloway; N McMahon; J Milligan; Bk Park; M Pirmohamed; C Pollard; J Radford; N Roome; P Sager; S Singh; T Suter; W Suter; A Trafford; Pga Volders; R Wallis; R Weaver; M York; Jp Valentin Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Anne S Y Chain; Vincent F S Dubois; Meindert Danhof; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Oscar Della Pasqua Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Vincent F S Dubois; Giovanni Smania; Huixin Yu; Ramona Graf; Anne S Y Chain; Meindert Danhof; Oscar Della Pasqua Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-10-29 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Kevin R DeMarco; Pei-Chi Yang; Vikrant Singh; Kazuharu Furutani; John R D Dawson; Mao-Tsuen Jeng; James C Fettinger; Slava Bekker; Van A Ngo; Sergei Y Noskov; Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; Jon T Sack; Heike Wulff; Colleen E Clancy; Igor Vorobyov Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2021-05-29 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Ray W Chui; Joel Baublits; Fiona A Chandra; Zack W Jones; Michael J Engwall; Hugo M Vargas Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 4.689