Literature DB >> 21306581

How can we improve our understanding of cardiovascular safety liabilities to develop safer medicines?

Hg Laverty1, C Benson, Ej Cartwright, Mj Cross, C Garland, T Hammond, C Holloway, N McMahon, J Milligan, Bk Park, M Pirmohamed, C Pollard, J Radford, N Roome, P Sager, S Singh, T Suter, W Suter, A Trafford, Pga Volders, R Wallis, R Weaver, M York, Jp Valentin.   

Abstract

Given that cardiovascular safety liabilities remain a major cause of drug attrition during preclinical and clinical development, adverse drug reactions, and post-approval withdrawal of medicines, the Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science hosted a workshop to discuss current challenges in determining, understanding and addressing 'Cardiovascular Toxicity of Medicines'. This article summarizes the key discussions from the workshop that aimed to address three major questions: (i) what are the key cardiovascular safety liabilities in drug discovery, drug development and clinical practice? (ii) how good are preclinical and clinical strategies for detecting cardiovascular liabilities? and (iii) do we have a mechanistic understanding of these liabilities? It was concluded that in order to understand, address and ultimately reduce cardiovascular safety liabilities of new therapeutic agents there is an urgent need to: • Fully characterize the incidence, prevalence and impact of drug-induced cardiovascular issues at all stages of the drug development process. • Ascertain the predictive value of existing non-clinical models and assays towards the clinical outcome. • Understand the mechanistic basis of cardiovascular liabilities; by addressing areas where it is currently not possible to predict clinical outcome based on preclinical safety data. • Provide scientists in all disciplines with additional skills to enable them to better integrate preclinical and clinical data and to better understand the biological and clinical significance of observed changes. • Develop more appropriate, highly relevant and predictive tools and assays to identify and wherever feasible to eliminate cardiovascular safety liabilities from molecules and wherever appropriate to develop clinically relevant and reliable safety biomarkers.
© 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21306581      PMCID: PMC3111672          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01255.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  64 in total

Review 1.  Predicting ADME properties and side effects: the BioPrint approach.

Authors:  Cecile M Krejsa; Dragos Horvath; Sherri L Rogalski; Julie E Penzotti; Boryeu Mao; Frédérique Barbosa; Jacques C Migeon
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2003-07

2.  Determination of myocardium to plasma concentration ratios of five antipsychotic drugs: comparison with their ability to induce arrhythmia and sudden death in clinical practice.

Authors:  Karine Titier; Mireille Canal; Evelyne Déridet; Abdelilah Abouelfath; Sophie Gromb; Mathieu Molimard; Nicholas Moore
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 3.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?

Authors:  Ismail Kola; John Landis
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  Keynote review: in vitro safety pharmacology profiling: an essential tool for successful drug development.

Authors:  Steven Whitebread; Jacques Hamon; Dejan Bojanic; Laszlo Urban
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 5.  In vitro models to evaluate acute and chronic injury to the heart and vascular systems.

Authors:  Charles R Partridge; Charles D Johnson; Kenneth S Ramos
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Cardiac lesions induced by neuroleptic drugs in the rabbit.

Authors:  D Belhani; D Frassati; R Mégard; P Tsibiribi; B Bui-Xuan; A Tabib; L Fanton; D Malicier; J Descotes; Q Timour
Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2005-11-15

7.  Adverse events in phase-I studies: a report in 1015 healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M Sibille; N Deigat; A Janin; S Kirkesseli; D V Durand
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Electrocardiographic monitoring in toxicological studies: principles and interpretations.

Authors:  D K Detweiler
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 9.  Troponin: the biomarker of choice for the detection of cardiac injury.

Authors:  Luciano Babuin; Allan S Jaffe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Relationships between preclinical cardiac electrophysiology, clinical QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes for a broad range of drugs: evidence for a provisional safety margin in drug development.

Authors:  W S Redfern; L Carlsson; A S Davis; W G Lynch; I MacKenzie; S Palethorpe; P K S Siegl; I Strang; A T Sullivan; R Wallis; A J Camm; T G Hammond
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 10.787

View more
  82 in total

1.  Ensembles of engineered cardiac tissues for physiological and pharmacological study: heart on a chip.

Authors:  Anna Grosberg; Patrick W Alford; Megan L McCain; Kevin Kit Parker
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 2.  Cardiovascular toxicity of anticancer-targeted therapy: emerging issues in the era of cardio-oncology.

Authors:  Emanuel Raschi; Fabrizio De Ponti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Population-based toxicity screening in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Sarah D Burnett; Alexander D Blanchette; Fabian A Grimm; John S House; David M Reif; Fred A Wright; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  Remote Cardiac Safety Monitoring through the Lens of the FDA Biomarker Qualification Evidentiary Criteria Framework: A Case Study Analysis.

Authors:  Elena S Izmailova; William A Wood; Qi Liu; Vadim Zipunnikov; Daniel Bloomfield; Jason Homsy; Steven C Hoffmann; John A Wagner; Joseph P Menetski
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 5.  High-Content Assessment of Cardiac Function Using Heart-on-a-Chip Devices as Drug Screening Model.

Authors:  Genevieve Conant; Benjamin Fook Lun Lai; Rick Xing Ze Lu; Anastasia Korolj; Erika Yan Wang; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  Navigating tissue chips from development to dissemination: A pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  Lorna Ewart; Kristin Fabre; Ananthsrinivas Chakilam; Yvonne Dragan; David B Duignan; Jeetu Eswaraka; Jinping Gan; Peggy Guzzie-Peck; Monicah Otieno; Claire G Jeong; Douglas A Keller; Sonia M de Morais; Jonathan A Phillips; William Proctor; Radhakrishna Sura; Terry Van Vleet; David Watson; Yvonne Will; Danilo Tagle; Brian Berridge
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-06-16

7.  Light-Activated Dynamic Clamp Using iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Bonnie Quach; Trine Krogh-Madsen; Emilia Entcheva; David J Christini
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Towards Bridging Translational Gap in Cardiotoxicity Prediction: an Application of Progressive Cardiac Risk Assessment Strategy in TdP Risk Assessment of Moxifloxacin.

Authors:  Nikunjkumar Patel; Oliver Hatley; Alexander Berg; Klaus Romero; Barbara Wisniowska; Debra Hanna; David Hermann; Sebastian Polak
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Assessment of beating parameters in human induced pluripotent stem cells enables quantitative in vitro screening for cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Oksana Sirenko; Evan F Cromwell; Carole Crittenden; Jessica A Wignall; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 10.  The role of concentration-effect relationships in the assessment of QTc interval prolongation.

Authors:  Nicholas P France; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.