Literature DB >> 15701707

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine and fentanyl in rats: role of receptor equilibration kinetics.

Ashraf Yassen1, Erik Olofsen, Albert Dahan, Meindert Danhof.   

Abstract

The objective of this investigation was to characterize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlation of buprenorphine and fentanyl for the antinociceptive effect in rats. Data on the time course of the antinociceptive effect following intravenous administration of buprenorphine or fentanyl was analyzed in conjunction with plasma concentrations by nonlinear mixed-effects analysis. For fentanyl, the pharmacokinetics was described on the basis of a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. For buprenorphine, a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model best described the concentration time course. To explain time dependencies in pharmacodynamics of buprenorphine and fentanyl, a combined effect compartment/receptor binding model was applied. A log logistic probability distribution model is proposed to account for censored tail-flick latencies. The model converged, yielding precise estimates of the parameters characterizing hysteresis. The results show that onset and offset of the antinociceptive effect of both buprenorphine and fentanyl is mainly determined by biophase distribution. The k(eo) was 0.024 min(-1) [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.018-0.030 min(-1)] and 0.123 min(-1) (95% CI: 0.095-0.151 min(-1)) for buprenorphine and fentanyl, respectively. On the other hand, part of the hysteresis in the buprenorphine pharmacodynamics could be explained by slow receptor association/dissociation kinetics. The k(off) was 0.073 min(-1) (95% CI: 0.042-0.104 min(-1)) and k(on) was 0.023 ml/ng/min (95% CI: 0.013-0.033 ml/ng/min). Fentanyl binds instantaneously to the OP3 receptor because no reasonable values for k(on) and k(off) were obtained with the dynamical receptor model. In contrast to earlier reports in the literature, the findings of this study show that the rate-limiting step in the onset and offset of buprenorphine's antinociceptive effect is distribution to the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15701707     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.104.082560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  32 in total

Review 1.  Long-lasting target binding and rebinding as mechanisms to prolong in vivo drug action.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; Steven J Charlton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Modelling of alpha1-adrenoceptor-mediated temporal dynamics of inotropic response in rat heart to assess ligand binding and signal transduction parameters.

Authors:  P Sermsappasuk; M Weiss
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in anaesthesia.

Authors:  Pedro L Gambús; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  A predictive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of fentanyl for analgesia/sedation in neonates based on a semi-physiologic approach.

Authors:  Esther Encinas; Rosario Calvo; John C Lukas; Valvanera Vozmediano; Monica Rodriguez; Elena Suarez
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Pontine μ-opioid receptors mediate bradypnea caused by intravenous remifentanil infusions at clinically relevant concentrations in dogs.

Authors:  Ivana Prkic; Sanda Mustapic; Tomislav Radocaj; Astrid G Stucke; Eckehard A E Stuth; Francis A Hopp; Caron Dean; Edward J Zuperku
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The in vitro pharmacological profile of TD-1211, a neutral opioid receptor antagonist.

Authors:  Pamela R Tsuruda; Ross G Vickery; Daniel D Long; Scott R Armstrong; David T Beattie
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.

Authors:  Christopher Louizos; Jaime A Yáñez; M Laird Forrest; Neal M Davies
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.327

8.  A physiologically-based recirculatory meta-model for nasal fentanyl in man.

Authors:  Richard N Upton; David J R Foster; Lona L Christrup; Ola Dale; Kristin Moksnes; Lars Popper
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.745

9.  Electromyographic activation reveals cortical and sub-cortical dissociation during emergence from general anesthesia.

Authors:  Darren F Hight; Logan J Voss; Paul S García; Jamie W Sleigh
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.502

10.  Quantification of the Pharmacodynamic Interaction of Morphine and Gabapentin Using a Response Surface Approach.

Authors:  Theodoros Papathanasiou; Rasmus Vestergaard Juul; Charlotte Gabel-Jensen; Mads Kreilgaard; Anne-Marie Heegaard; Trine Meldgaard Lund
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.