Literature DB >> 27417110

10-Year Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic or Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

Marco E Allaix1, Giuseppe Giraudo2, Alessia Ferrarese2, Alberto Arezzo2, Fabrizio Rebecchi2, Mario Morino2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only few studies have compared laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) and open total mesorectal excision (OTME) for rectal cancer with follow-up longer than 5 years. The aim of this study was to compare 10-year oncologic outcomes after LTME and OTME for nonmetastatic rectal cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of rectal cancer patients undergoing LTME or OTME. Statistical analyses were performed on an ''intention-to-treat'' basis and by actual treatment. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared by using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of poor survival.
RESULTS: Between April 1994 and August 2005, a total of 153 LTME patients and 154 OTME patients were included. Similarly, 10-year OS and DFS after LTME and OTME were observed: 76.8 versus 70.6 % (P = 0.138) and 69.1 versus 67.6 % (P = 0.508), respectively. Conversion to OTME did not adversely affect OS and DFS. Stage-by-stage comparison showed no significant differences between LTME and OTME. No significant differences were observed in local recurrence rates after LTME and OTME (6.5 vs. 7.8 %, P = 0.837). Median time until local recurrence was 24.5 (range, 12-56) months after LTME and 22 (6-64) months after OTME (P = 0.777). Poor tumor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and a lymph node ratio of 0.25 or more were the independent predictors of poorer OS and DFS.
CONCLUSION: This retrospective study with long follow-up did not show significant differences between the two groups in OS and DFS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27417110     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3631-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  48 in total

1.  Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Arden M Morris; David A Rothenberger; Joel E Tepper
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Oncological outcome following anastomotic leak in rectal surgery.

Authors:  E Espín; M A Ciga; M Pera; H Ortiz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.

Authors:  R J Heald; B J Moran; R D Ryall; R Sexton; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

6.  Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J K MacFarlane; R D Ryall; R J Heald
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio: a single-center analysis of 3,026 patients over a 25-year time period.

Authors:  Robert Rosenberg; Jan Friederichs; Tibor Schuster; Ralf Gertler; Matthias Maak; Karen Becker; Anne Grebner; Kurt Ulm; Heinz Höfler; Hjalmar Nekarda; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  M den Dulk; C A M Marijnen; L Collette; H Putter; L Påhlman; J Folkesson; J-F Bosset; C Rödel; K Bujko; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Esther Kuhry; Wolfgang Schwenk; Robin Gaupset; Ulla Romild; Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 12.111

View more
  8 in total

1.  Use of a simplified consent form to facilitate patient understanding of informed consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Alessandro Borello; Alessia Ferrarese; Roberto Passera; Alessandra Surace; Silvia Marola; Claudio Buccelli; Massimo Niola; Pierpaolo Di Lorenzo; Maurizio Amato; Lorenza Di Domenico; Mario Solej; Valter Martino
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-12-16

Review 2.  The comprehensive therapeutic effects of rectal surgery are better in laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiabin Zheng; Xingyu Feng; Zifeng Yang; Weixian Hu; Yuwen Luo; Yong Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-21

3.  Excellence and safety in surgery require excellent and safe tutoring.

Authors:  Alessia Ferrarese; Claudio Buccelli; Giuseppe Addeo; Emanuele Capasso; Adelaide Conti; Maurizio Amato; Rita Compagna; Massimo Niola; Valter Martino
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-12-25

4.  Self-gripping mesh versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized prospective clinical trial in young and elderly patients.

Authors:  Alessia Ferrarese; Marco Bindi; Matteo Rivelli; Mario Solej; Stefano Enrico; Valter Martino
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-11-26

5.  The learning curve of laparoscopic holecystectomy in general surgery resident training: old age of the patient may be a risk factor?

Authors:  Alessia Ferrarese; Valentina Gentile; Marco Bindi; Matteo Rivelli; Jacopo Cumbo; Mario Solej; Stefano Enrico; Valter Martino
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-11-26

6.  Learning curve for endorectal ultrasound in young and elderly: lights and shades.

Authors:  Alessandra Surace; Alessia Ferrarese; Valentina Gentile; Marco Bindi; Jacopo Cumbo; Mario Solej; Stefano Enrico; Valter Martino
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-11-19

Review 7.  Similarities and differences between study designs in short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, case-matched, and cohort studies.

Authors:  Nobuaki Hoshino; Yudai Fukui; Koya Hida; Kazutaka Obama
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-11-21

8.  The Multidisciplinary Approach of Rectal Cancer: The Experience of "COMRE Group" Model.

Authors:  Stefano Scabini; Emanuele Romairone; Davide Pertile; Andrea Massobrio; Alessandra Aprile; Luca Tagliafico; Domenico Soriero; Luca Mastracci; Federica Grillo; Almalina Bacigalupo; Ciro Marrone; Maria Caterina Parodi; Marina Sartini; Maria Luisa Cristina; Roberto Murialdo; Gabriele Zoppoli; Alberto Ballestrero
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.