Literature DB >> 25619499

Oncological outcome following anastomotic leak in rectal surgery.

E Espín1, M A Ciga, M Pera, H Ortiz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The influence of anastomotic leak on local recurrence and survival remains debated in rectal cancer.
METHODS: This was a multicentre observational study using data from the Spanish Rectal Cancer Project database. Demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, tumour location, stage, use of defunctioning stoma, administration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, invasion of circumferential resection margin, quality of mesorectal excision and anastomotic leakage were recorded. Anastomotic leak was defined as an anastomotic event requiring surgical intervention or interventional radiology, including pelvic abscesses without radiological evidence of leakage and early rectovaginal fistulas. Variables associated with oncological outcome were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 1181 consecutive patients were included. Rates of anastomotic leak and 30-day postoperative mortality were 9·4 and 2·4 per cent respectively. Data from 1153 patients were analysed after a median follow-up of 5 years. Cumulative rates of local recurrence, overall recurrence, overall survival and cancer-specific survival were 4·9, 19·4, 77·5 and 84·7 per cent respectively. In the multivariable regression analysis, anastomotic leakage was not associated with local recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 0·80, 95 per cent c.i. 0·28 to 2·26; P = 0·669), overall recurrence (HR 1·14, 0·70 to 1·85; P = 0·606), overall survival (HR 1·10, 0·73 to 1·65; P = 0·648) or cancer-specific survival (HR 1·23, 0·75 to 2·02; P = 0·421).
CONCLUSION: Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection did not affect oncological outcomes in these patients.
© 2015 BJS Society Ltd Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25619499     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  21 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of post-operative peritonitis after gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Ewen A Griffiths; Maurizio Nestori
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-08-12

Review 2.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Postoperative intra-abdominal infection is an independent prognostic factor of disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in patients with stage II colon cancer.

Authors:  P Sánchez-Velázquez; M Pera; M Jiménez-Toscano; X Mayol; X Rogés; L Lorente; M Iglesias; M Gallén
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  10-Year Oncologic Outcomes After Laparoscopic or Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Giuseppe Giraudo; Alessia Ferrarese; Alberto Arezzo; Fabrizio Rebecchi; Mario Morino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Postoperative Complications: Looking Forward to a Safer Future.

Authors:  Sarah E Tevis; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 6.  Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Blanco-Colino; E Espin-Basany
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Pathologic response grade after long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation does not influence morbidity in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer resected by laparoscopy.

Authors:  Filippo Landi; Eloy Espín; Victor Rodrigues; Francesc Vallribera; Aleix Martinez; Cecile Charpy; Francesco Brunetti; Daniel Azoulay; Nicola de'Angelis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Prophylactic transanal decompression tube versus non-prophylactic transanal decompression tube for anastomotic leakage prevention in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Yang; Ye Shu; Fangyu Su; Lin Xia; Baofeng Duan; Xiaoting Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Prognostic impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infections after elective colorectal cancer resection on survival and local recurrence: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Toshinori Sueda; Mitsuyoshi Tei; Yukihiro Yoshikawa; Haruna Furukawa; Tae Matsumura; Chikato Koga; Masaki Wakasugi; Hiromichi Miyagaki; Ryohei Kawabata; Masanori Tsujie; Junichi Hasegawa
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  The assessment of risk factors for long-term survival outcome in ypN0 patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy and radical anterior resection.

Authors:  Marcin Zeman; Marek Czarnecki; Ewa Chmielik; Adam Idasiak; Władysław Skałba; Mirosław Strączyński; Piotr J Paul; Agnieszka Czarniecka
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.