| Literature DB >> 27412111 |
Qun Yan1, Dongmei Sun1,2, Xu Li1, Guoliang Chen2, Qinghu Zheng2, Lun Li2, Chenhong Gu2, Bo Feng3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of epidemiological researches examining the relationship between blood pressure (BP) and glucose level among older adults. The objective of the current study was to investigate the association of high BP and glucose level in elderly Chinese.Entities:
Keywords: Cross-sectional study; Diabetes; Fasting plasma glucose; Hypertension
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27412111 PMCID: PMC4944450 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-016-0119-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Endocr Disord ISSN: 1472-6823 Impact factor: 2.763
Fig. 1Study design and participant flow diagram for the present study
Baseline characteristics by sex
| Parameters | Men | Women |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 971 | 1121 | |
| Age(y) | 72.8 ± 6.4 | 73.6 ± 7.0 | 0.027 |
| Current smoker n (%) | 215(22.1 %) | 27(2.4 %) | 0.000 |
| Alcohol consumption n (%) | 143(14.7 %) | 17(1.5 %) | 0.000 |
| T2DM n (%) | 224(23.1 %) | 266(23.7) | 0.381 |
| IFG n (%) | 142(14.6 %) | 167(14.9 %) | 0.455 |
| Hypertension n (%) | 440(45.3 %) | 544(48.5 %) | 0.077 |
| High-normal BP n (%) | 427(44.0 %) | 489(43.6 %) | 0.453 |
| BMI(kg/m2) | 23.7 ± 3.3 | 23.9 ± 3.8 | 0.316 |
| WC(cm) | 87.9 ± 9.1 | 85.4 ± 10.3 | 0.000 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 133.7 ± 16.1 | 135.4 ± 15.8 | 0.013 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 78.6 ± 8.9 | 77.4 ± 8.6 | 0.002 |
| FPG (mmol/L, Mean) | 6.2 ± 1.6 | 6.3 ± 1.8 | 0.268 |
| FPG (mmol/L, Median) a | 5.45 | 5.51 | 0.268 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.5 ± 0.9 | 1.6 ± 0.9 | 0.000 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.2 ± 1.0 | 5.8 ± 1.0 | 0.000 |
Categorical data were described as n (%) and continuous data were described as means ± SD
BMI body mass index, WC waist circumference, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, FPG fasting plasma glucose, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol
aThe median of FPG in subjects with normal fasting glucose level (<6.1 mmol/L)
P values < 0.05 were considered significant
Logistic regression analysis of association of hyperglycemia status with risk of hypertensiona
| SBP ≥ 140 mmHg | DBP ≥ 90 mmHg | Total Hypertension | New-onset Hypertension | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| OR (95 % CI) |
| |
| NFG | 1 | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | 1 | - |
| IFG | 1.89(1.46–2.45) | 0.000 | 1.31(0.94–1.84) | 0.111 | 1.81(1.39–2.35) | 0.000 | 1.68(1.18–2.41) | 0.004 |
| New-onset DM | 1.44(0.99–1.65) | 0.053 | 1.23(0.78–1.95) | 0.375 | 1.35(0.93–1.94) | 0.115 | 1.49(0.91–2.42) | 0.113 |
| Previously-diagnosed DM | 1.46(1.13–1.87) | 0.003 | 1.02(0.72–1.44) | 0.913 | 1.40(1.09–1.80) | 0.009 | 0.90(0.61–1.33) | 0.592 |
NFG normal fasting glucose, IFG impaired fasting glucose, New-onset DM, newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus; Previously-Diagnosed DM, previously diagnosed diabetes mellitus; New-onset hypertension, newly diagnosed hypertension; OR (95 % CI), odds ratio (95 % confidence index); other abbreviations see Table 1
aAdjusted for sex, age, smoking, alcohol consumption, BMI, TG and TC level
P values < 0.05 were considered significant
Logistic regression analysis of risk of hypertension in subjects with NFG (above vs. below the median fasting glucose level a)
| Men | Women | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI, below vs above the median $) |
| Adjusted R2 | OR (95 % CI, below vs above the median $) |
| Adjusted R2 | |
| Total Hypertension | ||||||
| Model 1 | 1.93(1.60–2.34) | 0.000 | 0.028 | 1.96(1.51–2.54) | 0.000 | 0.033 |
| Model 2 | 1.24(0.85–1.80) | 0.023 | 0.114 | 1.61(1.12–2.30) | 0.010 | 0.082 |
| SBP ≥ 140 mmHg | ||||||
| Model 1 | 2.04(1.54–2.70) | 0.000 | 0.022 | 2.03(1.56–2.65) | 0.000 | 0.026 |
| Model 2 | 1.50(1.07–2.10) | 0.019 | 0.058 | 1.27(0.93–1.74) | 0.013 | 0.071 |
| DBP ≥ 90 mmHg | ||||||
| Model 1 | 1.21(0.84–1.75) | 0.301 | 0.022 | 1.67(1.12–2.67) | 0.011 | 0.063 |
| Model 2 | 0.72(0.46–1.15) | 0.167 | 0.048 | 1.35(0.85–2.12) | 0.201 | 0.015 |
Abbreviations see Tables 1 and 2
Model 1, adjusted for age, smoking and alcohol using
Model 2, adjusted for age, smoking, alchol using, BMI, WC, TG and TC level
aThe median fasting glucose level was 5.45 mmol/L in men and 5.51 mmol/L in women respectively
P values < 0.05 were considered significant
Stepwise linear regression analysis of risk factors for SBP and DBP
| All subjects ( | Subjects without hypoglycemic or antihypertensive drugs ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBP | DBP | SBP | DBP | |||||
| β | R2 | β | R2 | β | R2 | β | R2 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.15** | 0.034 | 0.13** | 0.032 | 0.15** | 0.028 | 0.42 | - |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 0.10** | 0.013 | 0.022 | - | 0.12** | 0.013 | 0.08* | 0.006 |
| Age (years) | 0.09** | 0.008 | -0.16** | 0.019 | 0.07* | 0.004 | -0.17** | 0.026 |
| Smoking | −0.07 | - | −0.03 | - | −0.13* | 0.012 | −0.23 | - |
| (yes/no) | ||||||||
| Alcohol consumption | 0.06** | 0.003 | 0.021 | - | 0.07* | 0.004 | 0.026 | - |
| (yes/no) | ||||||||
| TC (mmol/L) | 0.05* | 0.003 | 0.09** | 0.005 | 0.04 | - | 0.061 | - |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.07** | 0.002 | 0.05* | 0.007 | 0.01 | - | -0.34 | - |
| Male (vs.Female) | 0.02 | - | −0.09 | - | 0.03 | - | 0.109 | - |
| WC(mmol/L) | 0.57 | - | 0.61 | - | 0.09 | - | 0.14** | 0.021 |
Abbreviations see Table 1
* P value < 0.05; **P value < 0.01
Multiple logistic regression analysis of risk of IFG and DM
| IFG | DM | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) | Adjusted R2 | OR (95 % CI) | Adjusted R2 | |
| Model 1 a | 0.045 | 0.028 | ||
| Age (years) | 1.01(0.99–1.03) | 1.00(0.99–1.02) | ||
| Male (vs. female) | 0.95(0.73–1.25) | 0.99(0.78–1.24) | ||
| Smoking(yes/no) | 0.92(0.68–1.08) | 1.01(0.85–1.21) | ||
| Alcohol consumption (yes/no) | 1.06(0.84–1.43) | 0.93(0.76–1.41) | ||
| High-normal BP | 2.07(1.13–3.78)* | 1.78(1.14–2.76)* | ||
| (vs. normal BP) | ||||
| Hypertension | 3.92(2.17–7.10)** | 2.83(1.83–4.38)** | ||
| (vs. normal BP) | ||||
| Model 2 b | 0.095 | 0.140 | ||
| Age (years) | 1.01(0.99–1.03) | 1.01(0.99–1.03) | ||
| Male (vs. female) | 0.96(0.71–1.30) | 0.97(0.81–1.18) | ||
| Smoking(yes/no) | 0.83(0.65–1.05) | 0.92(0.74–1.14) | ||
| Alcohol consumption (yes/no) | 1.09(0.86–1.39) | 0.99(0.77–1.28) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 1.02(0.95–1.09) | 1.04(0.99–1.10)** | ||
| WC(mmol/L) | 1.03(1.00–1.06)* | 1.04(1.02–1.06)** | ||
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.42(1.22–1.66)** | 1.55(1.36–1.77)** | ||
| TC (mmol/L) | 0.96(0.84–1.10) | 0.95(0.85–1.06) | ||
| High-normal BP | 1.87(1.03–3.44)* | 1.46(0.94–2.31) | ||
| (vs. normal BP) | ||||
| Hypertension | 3.17(1.70–5.68)** | 1.93(1.22–3.04)** | ||
| (vs. normal BP) | ||||
Abbreviations see Tables 1 and 2
Normal BP, SBP < 120 mmHg and DBP < 80 mmHg and not using antihypertensive medication; high-normal BP, SBP 120–139 mmHg or DBP 80–90 mmHg; hypertension, SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg or using antihypertensive medication
aModel 1: Logistic regression analysis with IFG and DM as dependent variable respectively, and age, male (vs. female), smoking, alcohol consumption, and high-normal BP (vs. normal BP) and hypertension (vs. normal BP) as independent variables
bModel 2: Model 1 + BMI, WC, TG and TC
* P value < 0.05; **P value < 0.01