Literature DB >> 29059675

Nasonia Parasitic Wasps Escape from Haller's Rule by Diphasic, Partially Isometric Brain-Body Size Scaling and Selective Neuropil Adaptations.

Jitte Groothuis1, Hans M Smid.   

Abstract

Haller's rule states that brains scale allometrically with body size in all animals, meaning that relative brain size increases with decreasing body size. This rule applies both on inter- and intraspecific comparisons. Only 1 species, the extremely small parasitic wasp Trichogramma evanescens, is known as an exception and shows an isometric brain-body size relation in an intraspecific comparison between differently sized individuals. Here, we investigated if such an isometric brain-body size relationship also occurs in an intraspecific comparison with a slightly larger parasitic wasp, Nasonia vitripennis, a species that may vary 10-fold in body weight upon differences in levels of scramble competition during larval development. We show that Nasonia exhibits diphasic brain-body size scaling: larger wasps scale allometrically, following Haller's rule, whereas the smallest wasps show isometric scaling. Brains of smaller wasps are, therefore, smaller than expected and we hypothesized that this may lead to adaptations in brain architecture. Volumetric analysis of neuropil composition revealed that wasps of different sizes differed in relative volume of multiple neuropils. The optic lobes and mushroom bodies in particular were smaller in the smallest wasps. Furthermore, smaller brains had a relatively smaller total neuropil volume and larger cellular rind than large brains. These changes in relative brain size and brain architecture suggest that the energetic constraints on brain tissue outweigh specific cognitive requirements in small Nasonia wasps.
© 2017 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; Haller’s rule; Insect; Mushroom body; Nasonia vitripennis; Neuropil; Parasitic wasp; Plasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29059675      PMCID: PMC5804836          DOI: 10.1159/000480421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  41 in total

1.  Correction methods for three-dimensional reconstructions from confocal images: I. Tissue shrinking and axial scaling.

Authors:  D Bucher; M Scholz; M Stetter; K Obermayer; H J Pflüger
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2000-07-31       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Behavioral Performance and Neural Systems Are Robust to Sensory Injury in Workers of the Ant Pheidole dentata.

Authors:  Hannah K Waxman; Mario L Muscedere; James F A Traniello
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 3.  Integration of polarization and chromatic cues in the insect sky compass.

Authors:  Basil el Jundi; Keram Pfeiffer; Stanley Heinze; Uwe Homberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Clearing pigmented insect cuticle to investigate small insects' organs in situ using confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM).

Authors:  Marco Smolla; Markus Ruchty; Manuel Nagel; Christoph J Kleineidam
Journal:  Arthropod Struct Dev       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.010

5.  Extremes of lineage plasticity in the Drosophila brain.

Authors:  Suewei Lin; Elizabeth C Marin; Ching-Po Yang; Chih-Fei Kao; Bettye A Apenteng; Yaling Huang; Michael B O'Connor; James W Truman; Tzumin Lee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Brain allometry in bumblebee and honey bee workers.

Authors:  Stefanie Mares; Lesley Ash; Wulfila Gronenberg
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions.

Authors:  Stephan Preibisch; Stephan Saalfeld; Pavel Tomancak
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 8.  Brain scaling in mammalian evolution as a consequence of concerted and mosaic changes in numbers of neurons and average neuronal cell size.

Authors:  Suzana Herculano-Houzel; Paul R Manger; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.856

9.  A systematic nomenclature for the insect brain.

Authors:  Kei Ito; Kazunori Shinomiya; Masayoshi Ito; J Douglas Armstrong; George Boyan; Volker Hartenstein; Steffen Harzsch; Martin Heisenberg; Uwe Homberg; Arnim Jenett; Haig Keshishian; Linda L Restifo; Wolfgang Rössler; Julie H Simpson; Nicholas J Strausfeld; Roland Strauss; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Development of a Nasonia vitripennis outbred laboratory population for genetic analysis.

Authors:  Louis van de Zande; Steven Ferber; Ammerins de Haan; Leo W Beukeboom; Joost van Heerwaarden; Bart A Pannebakker
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 7.090

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effects of Isometric Brain-Body Size Scaling on the Complexity of Monoaminergic Neurons in a Minute Parasitic Wasp.

Authors:  Emma van der Woude; Hans M Smid
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 1.808

2.  Behavioral performance and division of labor influence brain mosaicism in the leafcutter ant Atta cephalotes.

Authors:  I B Muratore; E M Fandozzi; J F A Traniello
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Life-history traits of the Whiting polyploid line of the parasitoid Nasonia vitripennis.

Authors:  Kelley Leung; Louis van de Zande; Leo W Beukeboom
Journal:  Entomol Exp Appl       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.250

4.  No gains for bigger brains: Functional and neuroanatomical consequences of relative brain size in a parasitic wasp.

Authors:  Emma van der Woude; Jitte Groothuis; Hans M Smid
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Constant neuropilar ratio in the insect brain.

Authors:  Alexey A Polilov; Anastasia A Makarova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Insects Provide Unique Systems to Investigate How Early-Life Experience Alters the Brain and Behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca R Westwick; Clare C Rittschof
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Brain morphology predicts social intelligence in wild cleaner fish.

Authors:  Zegni Triki; Yasmin Emery; Magda C Teles; Rui F Oliveira; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 8.  A Review of Effects of Environment on Brain Size in Insects.

Authors:  Thomas Carle
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Selection for associative learning of color stimuli reveals correlated evolution of this learning ability across multiple stimuli and rewards.

Authors:  Maartje Liefting; Katja M Hoedjes; Cécile Le Lann; Hans M Smid; Jacintha Ellers
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.