| Literature DB >> 27408748 |
Hamid Shirkhanloo1, Aisan Khaligh2, Farideh Golbabaei3, Zargham Sadeghi4, Amir Vahid5, Alimorad Rashidi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chromium (VI) has toxic and carcinogenic effects. So, determination and speciation of chromium in environmental samples is very important in view of health hazards. In this study, solid phase extraction (SPE) based on bulky amine-functionalized bimodal mesoporous silica nanoparticles (NH2-UVM-7) as a novel nanoadsorbent was applied for preconcentration and speciation of chromium (III, VI) in water samples.Entities:
Keywords: Amine-functionalized UVM-7; Chromium; Flame atomic absorption spectrometry; Removal; Solid phase extraction; Speciation
Year: 2015 PMID: 27408748 PMCID: PMC4940767 DOI: 10.1186/s40201-015-0205-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Health Sci Eng
Instrumental conditions for chromium determination by F-AAS
| Parameters | F-AAS |
|---|---|
| Wavelength | 357.9 nm |
| Slit | 0.2 nm |
| Lamp curent | 6 mA |
| Injection mode | Manual |
| Volume Injection | 2.2 mL/min |
| Mode | Integration |
| Fuel | Air-Acetylene |
Extraction Conditions of proposed method for chromium speciation
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Working pH | 2 |
| Amount of NH2-UVM-7 | 0.12 g |
| Sample volume of SPE | 100 mL |
| Volume of sample injection | 1.5 mL |
| Linear range (method) | 6-320 μg/L |
| Limit of detection (LOD) | 1.2 μg/L |
| Preconcentration factor (PF) | 66.7 |
| Buffer concentration | 0.03 mol/L |
| Volume of back-extraction solvent (NaOH) | 1.5 mL |
| Concentration of back-extraction solvent (NaOH) | 0.3 mol/L |
| Linear range (F-AAS) | 0.4 - 15 mg/L |
| Correlation coefficient of F-AAS | R2 = 0.9956 |
Fig. 1Low angle XRD patterns of calcined NH2-UVM-7 and UVM-7
Fig. 2Nitrogen physisorption isotherms of NH2-UVM-7 and UVM-7
Textural properties of UVM-7 and NH2-UVM-7
| Sample | SBET a(m2/g) | dsp b(nm) | dlp c(nm) | Vsp d(cm3/g) | Vlp e(cm3/g) | af(nm) | Wt g(nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UVM-7 | 863 | 2.67 | 52.2 | 0.42 | 0.84 | 5.59 | 2.92 |
| NH2-UVM-7 | 626 | 2.62 | 42.2 | 0.27 | 0.41 | 5.59 | 2.97 |
aBET specific surface area, bdiameter of small pores, cdiameter of large pores, dVolume of small pores, eVolume of large pores, fUnit cell parameter obtained from XRD diffractograms (2d 100/√3), gWall thickness(nm) obtained by following equation: Wt = a– (dp/1.05)
Fig. 3SEM image of NH2-UVM-7
Fig. 4TEM image of NH2-UVM-7
Fig. 5The influence of solution pH on the recovery of Cr (VI) (▲) and Cr (III) (■) ions with NH2-UVM-7 (▲). Conditions: sample volume 100 mL; adsorbent amount 0.12 g; eluent 1.5 mL of 0.3 mol/L NaOH; sample flow rate 2.5 mL/min
Fig. 6The influence of sample volume on the recovery of Cr (VI) ions. Conditions: solution pH 2; adsorbent amount 0.12 g; eluent 1.5 mL of 0.3 mol/L NaOH; sample flow rate 2.5 mL/min
Fig. 7The influence of amount of NH2-UVM-7 on the recovery of Cr (VI) ions. Conditions: sample volume 100 mL; solution pH 2; eluent 1.5 mL of 0.3 mol/L NaOH; sample flow rate 2.5 mL/min
The effect of matrix ions on chromium speciation and determination by proposed method
| Ions | Maximum tolerance ratio (matrix ion conc./Cr conc.) |
|---|---|
| Ni2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Co2+, Al3+, K+, Na+, | 2000 |
| V3+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Pb2+, Zn2+ | |
| PO4 3−, Cl -, CO3 2−, SO4 2−, NO3 − | 1000 |
This work was performed using 100 mL of 100 μg/L Cr (VI) standard solution
Fig. 8Effect of different eluents on the recovery of Cr (VI) ions from NH2-UVM-7 phase. Conditions: sample volume 100 mL; solution pH 2; adsorbent amount 0.12 g; sample flow rate 2.5 mL/min; eluent volume 1.5 mL
The reliability of proposed method for determination and speciation of Cr (III) and Cr (VI) in natural water samples
| Sample | Added (μg/L) | Found (μg/L)a | Total Cr a | Recovery (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cr3+ | Cr6+ | Cr3+ | Cr6+ | Cr3+ | Cr6+ | ||
| Tap water | --- | --- | 22.8 ± 1.2 | NDb | 22.8 ± 1.2 | --- | --- |
| 50 | --- | 71. 5 ± 3.4 | ND | 71.5 ± 3.4 | 97.4 | --- | |
| --- | 20 | 23.1 ± 1.8 | 19.5 ± 1.1 | 42.6 ± 2.3 | --- | 97.5 | |
| Drinking water | --- | --- | 8.7 ± 0.4 | 11.2 ± 0.5 | 19.9 ± 0.7 | --- | --- |
| 50 | --- | 57.9 ± 2.8 | 10.8 ± 0.4 | 68.7 ± 3.2 | 98.4 | --- | |
| --- | 20 | 8.4 ± 0.3 | 30.5 ± 1.3 | 38.9 ± 1.6 | --- | 96.5 | |
| Waste water c | --- | --- | 94.6 ± 4.8 | 52.3 ± 3.1 | 146.9 ± 6.8 | --- | --- |
| 50 | --- | 145.4 ± 6.5 | 50.1 ± 2.7 | 195.5 ± 9.6 | 101.6 | --- | |
| --- | 50 | 93.3 ± 4.3 | 100.6 ± 5.4 | 193.9 ± 8.5 | --- | 96.6 | |
| River | --- | --- | 17.6 ± 0. 8 | 9.4 ± 0.3 | 27.0 ± 1.4 | --- | --- |
| 10 | --- | 27.3 ± 1.3 | 9.6 ± 0.4 | 36.9 ± 1.9 | 97.0 | --- | |
| --- | 20 | 17.9 ± 0.7 | 28.9 ± 1.6 | 46.8 ± 2.4 | --- | 97.5 | |
| Industrial water | --- | --- | 49.1 ± 2.2 | 125.3 ± 5.1 | 174.4 ± 9.1 | --- | --- |
| 40 | --- | 88.6 ± 4.2 | 122.7 ± 4.8 | 211.3 ± 9.8 | 98.8 | --- | |
| --- | 40 | 48.8 ± 2.2 | 163.8 ± 6.7 | 212.6 ± 11.2 | --- | 96.3 | |
aMean of three determinations ± confidence interval (P = 0.95, n =5), bNot Detected, c from petrochemical factory
Validation of proposed method for chromium determination by certified reference material (N = 5)
| Bovine serum | Certified (μg/L) | Founda (μg/L) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIST SRM 1643e | 20.40 ± 0.24 | 19.48 ± 0.87 | 95.49 ± 0.44 |
aMean value ± ts/√N, SRM 1643e consists of approximately 250 mL of acidified water in a polyethylene bottle
Fig. 9Langmuir plot for chromium adsorption by NH2-UVM-7 at different temperatures
The Langmuir isotherm parameters for Cr (VI) adsorption by NH2-UVM-7 at different temperatures
| Temperature(°C) | Langmuir isotherm | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qmax(mg/g) | Max Ce/qe | R2 | teffective(min) | |
| 25 | 172.4 | 2.61 | 0.9952 | 100 |
| 45 | 192.3 | 2.92 | 0.9958 | 88 |
| 60 | 151.5 | 3.31 | 0.9946 | 83 |
Comparison of the proposed SPE/F-AAS method with various reported procedures for determination of chromium in water samples
| Detection method | Separation technique | PFa | LODb(μg/L) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICP -MS | DLLMEc | --- | 0.110 | [ |
| ET-AAS | SPEd | 20 | 0.050 | [ |
| ET-AAS | BDESe | 27 | 0.010 | [ |
| F-AAS | CPEf | 58 | 0.180 | [ |
| CAdSVa | EDCSg | --- | 0.007 | [ |
| F-AAS | SPEh | 66.7 | 1.2 | This work |
aPreconcentration factor, bLimit of detection, cDispersive liquid- liquid micro extraction, dSolid phase extraction, eBi-directional electrostacking, fCloud point extraction, gElectro deposition on cell surface, hNano solid phase extraction by NH2-UVM-7
Comparison of the proposed method with other SPE procedures for determination of chromium in water samples
| SPE adsorbent | LODa (μg/L) | PFb | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPC-Poly C-18c | 2.4 | 12 | ------ | [ |
| ENVI-18 DSK TM disk | 20 | 300 | ----- | [ |
| APDC/MWCNTd | 0.96 | 100 | 9.5 | [ |
| TIWACe | 4.5 | 50 | 61.0 | [ |
| Polymer f | 2.4 | 30 | 80.2 | [ |
| NH2-UVM-7 | 1.2 | 66.7 | 192.0 | This work |
aLimit of detection, bPre-concentration factor, c1,5-diphenylcarbohydrazide (DPC)-Polysorb C-18 beads, dAmmonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (APDC)/multi-walled carbon nanotubes, eTea-industry waste activated carbon, fPoly (1,3-thiazol-2-yl methacrylamide-co-4-vinyl pyridine-co-divinylbenzene)